Reformation Bear 6,453 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 I agree there should be a trimming of the squad. The next 18 months or so might be a very tough time for Ally and for Rangers. It will be a challenge and a half to trim the squad add to it where necessary and still win promotion next season ...... and with basis of a squad that would do a job in the top league. Notice I said 'do a job ' - which implies no more than just being competitive in the middle reaches of that league. The reason I say that is that if player cuts are needed - and they are - then the squad going into the top league might be below the level needed to compete. And by 'compete' I mean competing for a slot near the top of the league and european football. The ambition for the very top will, in my view, need very serious money and that is no more than wishful thinking at this time while so much time is spent looking at past events and talking about boycotts.Of course offers for better players might come in. The very fact of talking of 'no fire sale' might indicate to some clubs that the very opposite might be true so bargain hunters might appear and who knows what price Lee Wallace might be sold for in January if an offer arrived.Whislt trimming the squad does look like the right thing to be doing, I suppose that trimming costs elsewhere in Ibrox will also be on the agenda (maybe the staff cuts largely avoided by Green and Mather) may need to happen too. But perhaps most of all the counter-balance of the Board starting to map out how it can generate more cash for Rangers so that the ambition to get back to the very top - winning the top league and CL football.And in the next 18 months we will need to have won promotion from the Championship with that trimmed squad and probably with no access to new big funds. A challenge and a half perhaps. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gazza27 15,371 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 About time Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarcheVinny 1,003 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 Excellent But the young ones are untouchable. Home grown players should be kept until 21. If they don't feature you send them on loan and sell when they've got senior experience. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pcbear 10,924 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 Getting new clubs for all our deadwood will be tough, most are living the dream playing little or no football and being rewarded handsomely, who else will pay that sort of money when their football ability suggests much lower wages? we get caught in the pay off trap a bit too often = drained finances. Dundee United seem to have a conveyor belt of young talent that can hold down a first team place at a very young age, in all honesty Lewis Macleod looks the only one for the foreseeable that can do the same for us, maybe the DU youth coach/talent spotter should be high on our list of targets once the decks are cleared a bit. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 Getting new clubs for all our deadwood will be tough, most are living the dream playing little or no football and being rewarded handsomely, who else will pay that sort of money when their football ability suggests much lower wages? we get caught in the pay off trap a bit too often = drained finances. Dundee United seem to have a conveyor belt of young talent that can hold down a first team place at a very young age, in all honesty Lewis Macleod looks the only one for the foreseeable that can do the same for us, maybe the DU youth coach/talent spotter should be high on our list of targets once the decks are cleared a bit.See tbh I think McLeod is really ordinary a lot of the time - agree with the rest of your comment tho - getting rid of the surplus is easier said than done Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scarkev 3,540 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 I'm delighted we have a CEO that will make the decisions that need to be made! I hope one of his top priorities is addressing the wages out coaching staff are being paid! As others are alluding to getting a club for some of our players will be very difficult and will almost certainly include payoffs/incentives for them to move on! I would happily go with a first team squad of 15 and promote the youngsters and bleed them as early as possible! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
neilstonloyal 186 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 Everyone raves about Barrie McKay on hear and he has done absolutely fuck all Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CalvinC 1,414 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 Templeton Is the one we should command money for but I bet we end up paying him 100k to leaveCanny see anybody coming in for him, he has flattered to deceive in the pub leagues. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CalvinC 1,414 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 Everyone raves about Barrie McKay on hear and he has done absolutely fuck allI don't. I would rave about Macleod first. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scarkev 3,540 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 Although McKay has flattered to deceive at times you could argue the same about Templeton and from a business point of view (assuming we get good coaching into McKay) there is no question who you keep and who you move on! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted December 22, 2013 Author Share Posted December 22, 2013 KM & LM would eventually be added to the coaching staff if Ally is still retained. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pandabear 15 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 Finally, a guy in charge addressing this issue of overspending on wages, which has been the elephant in the room for over a year. Well done Graham Wallace, it finally looks look we have a guy in charge with the interest and experience in running a football club!How are we going to move these players on without making a financial loss? I have no idea. No club will pay 700k for Templeton.Foster is contracted to 2015 and it is unlikely that any club in England would sign him after his time at Bristol City, whilst Kyle Hutton has a broken leg. Cribari is too old and too pish.A positive and encouraging step for the club in my opinion. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CalvinC 1,414 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 Finally, a guy in charge addressing this issue of overspending on wages, which has been the elephant in the room for over a year. Well done Graham Wallace, it finally looks look we have a guy in charge with the interest and experience in running a football club!How are we going to move these players on without making a financial loss? I have no idea. No club will pay 700k for Templeton.Foster is contracted to 2015 and it is unlikely that any club in England would sign him after his time at Bristol City, whilst Kyle Hutton has a broken leg. Cribari is too old and too pish.A positive and encouraging step for the club in my opinion.Foster and Smith are pish as well. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace 3,556 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 This has been a long tone coming to be honest. We have a 36 man first team squad, a scandelous number consider the financial position we were/are in & ignoring the league we are in. I had hoped for a majority squad built around a youth policy but with a spine of experience ie GK, CH, CM & CH. I would say that Wallace's comments do lead me to believe that Lee Wallace will be included in these sales as he, amongst maybe 2or 3, is our only salable asset & we have an instant & cheaper replacement in Stevie Smith. I can see a list ofPerryCribariHeggartyHutton McAusland (because Ally prefers Forster .. to my annoyance)Mitchell (see McAusland)ShielsMcKayCrawfordThere will always be debate over which of our youth players should be launched into the first team & I see this as a real test of Ally: The Manager. He is now being forced to trim his burgeoning squad, he will have to make better use of the players at his disposal, thinking more tactically rather than just throwning players at a game. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billstar 7 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 Players definitely have to be moved on and the dead wood cut away. My only fear is we cut too deep and too quick in January with a lot of games coming up and still the Scottish Cup to come. We still require a good bench IMO for this. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMotor 2,208 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 As far as the January window goes, I would say McCulloch, Daly, Clark, McLeod, Law, Bell, Black, Mohsni and Wallace are untouchable. Aird and Crawford available for loan. Everyone else negotiable for loan, sale or release. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Monk 3,208 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 CribariFosterSmithHuttonHegartyPerryMitchellAnd possibly Shiels can go for me Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pandabear 15 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 I would say we should keep Aird in the first team as he's been playing well.I reckon Law and Wallace are our two main players who would have some interest from Championship clubs in England and which can be sold for a reasonable sum of cash. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneDavidCooper 2,505 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 Templeton has to go.So overrated it is untrue.I'd also release Smith, Simmonsen, Cribari, Perry and Sheils Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunk and disorderly. 14,741 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 I'd keep McKay and Templeton. The rest can move on. We would of course need to bring in a handful of players of a higher calibre to plug the gap. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nachothelegend 1,932 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 For me I reckon we did take on too many players at this level. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSuedeSambas 54,640 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 Foster, Smith, Cribari, Perry, Hegarty, Shiels, & Hutton are dispensable if we can find somebody to take them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricksen_da_best 2,034 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 Even most on here could have told ally he didn't need to sign these donkies in the first place Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CalvinC 1,414 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 Fuck it, I'll play right back. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManchestGer 347 Posted December 22, 2013 Share Posted December 22, 2013 Templeton has to go.So overrated it is untrue.I'd also release Smith, Simmonsen, Cribari, Perry and SheilsI've never understood our signing of Simmonsen, he's always on our train back after the game, think he heads towards Merseyside or Southport and I wonder why a. He bothers and b. why we bothered in the first place. Bang a recall clause on Scott Gallaghers loan deal and stick a young keeper on the bench. I agree with most of the players listed above being moved on and I'm glad it's being done. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.