RFFF money, what next?

[Bad Robot 21,150]

No, they don't. People are entitled to have a minority opinion.

I think your misinterpreting on what I'm trying to say.

Yes of course everyone is entitled to their opinion but when a poll shows a large difference of opinion all I'm saying is people should be asking themselves why they see it so different.

[legalbeagle 3,734]

I think your misinterpreting on what I'm trying to say.

Yes of course everyone is entitled to their opinion but when a poll shows a large difference of opinion all I'm saying is people should be asking themselves why they see it so different.

I'm not misinterpreting, I just don't agree with you.

[Bad Robot 21,150]

I'm not misinterpreting, I just don't agree with you.

lol fair enough

[Bluepeter9 5,167]

I donated to the RFFF in the genuime knowledge and belief that the fund would ONLY be used to ASSIST/DEFEND THE CLUB as necessary - not to support any individual in a dispute with the club or an individual Rangers director.

Whether Houston or Easdale is right is irrelevant; using the RFFF in this way would be a clear misuse (and abuse) of the Fund and in conflict with the premise, principles and objectives upon which it is founded.

Were this money to be used to fund Houston's defence against the claims brought by Easdale I would seriously consider taking legal advice to prevent the RFFF from doing so.

I did not donate to the Fund to assist Houston (or anyone else) in a dispute with the a Director.

This

[Bluepeter9 5,167]

I donated to the RFFF in the genuime knowledge and belief that the fund would ONLY be used to ASSIST/DEFEND THE CLUB as necessary - not to support any individual in a dispute with the club or an individual Rangers director.

Whether Houston or Easdale is right is irrelevant; using the RFFF in this way would be a clear misuse (and abuse) of the Fund and in conflict with the premise, principles and objectives upon which it is founded.

Were this money to be used to fund Houston's defence against the claims brought by Easdale I would seriously consider taking legal advice to prevent the RFFF from doing so.

I did not donate to the Fund to assist Houston (or anyone else) in a dispute with the a Director.

This

[Bad Robot 21,150]

Can anyone post the contact details of persons on the RFFF committee as I want to ensure any lawyers letters or representations goes to the correct person/location?

[elephants stoned 2,994]

There are still some good people on the board mate. 4 or 5 voted against this fraud and seven voted for it.

So this disgusting motion was passed?

[CanadianBacon 2,088]

I donated to the RFFF in the genuime knowledge and belief that the fund would ONLY be used to ASSIST/DEFEND THE CLUB as necessary - not to support any individual in a dispute with the club or an individual Rangers director.

Whether Houston or Easdale is right is irrelevant; using the RFFF in this way would be a clear misuse (and abuse) of the Fund and in conflict with the premise, principles and objectives upon which it is founded.

Were this money to be used to fund Houston's defence against the claims brought by Easdale I would seriously consider taking legal advice to prevent the RFFF from doing so.

I did not donate to the Fund to assist Houston (or anyone else) in a dispute with the a Director.

This sums the situation up completely.

A disgrace for any committee member to back this notion.

Those proposing it or backing it should resign forthwith.

Completely outside the remit of said committee.

[gmcf 34,199]

1) No

2) The original purpose - to defend our club

3) No - this was for Rangers benefit and that was why so many contributed.

4) Yes

A lot of effort was put into this fighting fund . Thousands contributed a large amount of money donated .

Misuse it now , and I doubt , should another effort ever be needed , that it would have the same response.

[gogzy 31,195]

9 people happy with this blatant misuse of the fund.

guessing they are sone of the fans that are ( to quote dave king) sabre rattlers and just looking for a fight.

[Carsons Dog 9,878]

9 people happy with this blatant misuse of the fund.

guessing they are sone of the fans that are ( to quote dave king) sabre rattlers and just looking for a fight.

Bead rattlers more like

[allgers 735]

Bead rattlers more like

Or one person with 68 accounts...

[CanadianBacon 2,088]

Money should be used help the club and not to a fans rep who cannot moderate a facebook page properly.

The Seditious Seven should / would have known that.

Oops!

[nachothelegend 1,932]

Fucking disgraceful.

[Mor3los_1 3,672]

The Seditious Seven should / would have known that.

Oops!

I posted the exact same on FF and got banned straight afterwards. Managed 4 posts in total, go me.

[CanadianBacon 2,088]

I posted the exact same on FF and got banned straight afterwards. Managed 4 posts in total, go me.

Why am I not surprised at this news?

[ArchibaldLeitch 380]

1-no

2-to defend the club

3-no

4-yes

This

[mabawsa 888]

Did anyone at the RFFF committee ask the opinion of these guys? Other side of the Pond and then beyond. Hard earned cash being proposed to be do shed out by chancers.

Looks like a totalitarian regime at the RFFF. Pure wasters if this is true.

http://www.rangers.co.uk/index.php/fans/fans-news/item/1254-more-rfff-cash-pours-in

[Creampuff 22,628]

Think it's hard to say what the money should be used for without knowing how much is there.

[Guardian 4,281]

If this was passed it will kill off fan projects.

There is no way a lot if fans will cough up cash like that again after this.

Not for fan ownership schemes, not for fighting funds and certainly not for anyone connected with this blatant misuse of funds.

I always thought this was the Rangers fans fighting fund and not the Fans Fighting Rangers Fund.

To think they wanted folk to give season ticket money to folk like this.

They just shot themselves on the foot big time.

[Bad Robot 21,150]

For the posters who voted that the persons shouldn't step down, can you please explain your reasoning?

To me this is a gross error of judgement and it worries me they these people are essentially the gatekeeper of over £500k of fans monies.

[Copland bear 7,966]

Well looking at the poll, I am not surprised by the results.

[rangersfc77 170]

If this was passed it will kill off fan projects.

There is no way a lot if fans will cough up cash like that again after this.

Not for fan ownership schemes, not for fighting funds and certainly not for anyone connected with this blatant misuse of funds.

I always thought this was the Rangers fans fighting fund and not the Fans Fighting Rangers Fund.

To think they wanted folk to give season ticket money to folk like this.

They just shot themselves on the foot big time.

That is a perfect summary

[nachothelegend 1,932]

For the posters who voted that the persons shouldn't step down, can you please explain your reasoning?

To me this is a gross error of judgement and it worries me they these people are essentially the gatekeeper of over £500k of fans monies.

It is frightening.

[siddiqi_drinker 14,635]

If this was passed it will kill off fan projects.

There is no way a lot if fans will cough up cash like that again after this.

Not for fan ownership schemes, not for fighting funds and certainly not for anyone connected with this blatant misuse of funds.

I always thought this was the Rangers fans fighting fund and not the Fans Fighting Rangers Fund.

To think they wanted folk to give season ticket money to folk like this.

They just shot themselves on the foot big time.

Seems according to the new thread that thew NARSA executive feels the same way.