Will the board speak now

[The Specky Forum Organiser 64,752]

35 minutes ago, baxterboy said:

Rescinding the card is redundant. The cabal already achieved its goal - Rangers are already 3 points behind the chosen after 2 games.

Job done.

A statement, though, is necessary.

One that informs the sfa and spfl - the entities controlled by fenians, that Jack's red card, the lack of punishment for the lennon and stokes are three of a long list of examples of a double standard against our club including wrongful demotion, unpunished cup final pitch invasions, etc etc etc

And that the long overdue lawsuit against the sfa and spfl for this double standard is forthcoming. 

'the cabal' 'the chosen'

Get a fucking grip. Are St Johnstone and Kilmarnock part of 'the cabal'?

[The Ibrox Derry 8,904]

2 hours ago, graeme_4 said:

Serious question, what exactly would you want them to say? 

That the wrong refereeing decision potentially cost us the 3 points??

[Smile 26,610]

1 minute ago, Frank Harrison said:

'the cabal' 'the chosen'

Get a fucking grip. Are St Johnstone and Kilmarnock part of 'the cabal'?

Dignified Silence for Frankie Boy, we get it.

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,729]

3 minutes ago, Frank Harrison said:

Issuing statements at board level about referees would be a new low.

If this was happening weekly then fine, but it isn't the referee had a shocker. People need to move on.

It was the worst performance I've seen other than ones later proven corrupt.

Let's wait though til weve been fucked up the arse that little bit more.

I actually don't want a statement. But I do want to hear we have taken measures in the background to address what occurred on Saturday.

Otherwise I don't actually think we will have which would be a disgrace.

[The Specky Forum Organiser 64,752]

Just now, Smile said:

Dignified Silence for Frankie Boy, we get it.

Where did I say that?

[graeme_4 34,537]

3 minutes ago, The Ibrox Derry said:

That the wrong refereeing decision potentially cost us the 3 points??

With what purpose? 

What do you want the board or SFA / SPFL to do?

They've recinded the red.

The McGeogh, Stokes and McGregor incidents were seen by the ref so there's no recourse. 

Beaton has been demoted. 

[Reformation Bear 6,453]

I don't think they will make a statement.  At least not yet anyway.

I assume they will be keeping tabs on events involving match officials and the officials / players in the SPFL where these events might be considered to be controversial in some way that might affect Rangers.  The thing to be watching is for instances where decisions are taken which have the effect (intended or supposedly otherwise) of making sure that Rangers suffer disadvantage in games with the effect of weakening the opportunity to win games.......and hampering the opportunity to win the league titles.   

I'm not saying there are influences at play designed to improperly and unfairly weaken Rangers in games by sendings off, harsh bookings, dubious penalties / free kicks in dangerous areas given against us, patently offside goals given against us: and the converse with perfectly obvious penalty and free kick decisions which should be given in our favour not awarded and goals chalked off which were perfectly good goals. But imo careful chapter and verse notes of all games this season should be being kept by the Club and monitored by the Board from time to time to watch out for any evidence of wilful acts or omissions designed to harm Rangers efforts to win football games.   Maybe they should be letting the SFA and SPFL know that behind the scenes these organisations and the performance of match officials and the public behaviour of people of influence in SPFL clubs will be monitored and if necessary brought to public attention.    

In competing to win the league title and to win cups it is axiomatic that the Club has confidence that we are being treated fairly at all times and are not subjected to unfair or improper decisions and disadvantages   

 

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,729]

8 minutes ago, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said:

I honestly don't know what you would expect them to say. The red card has been overturned. It was one of a number of bad decisions throughout the country which have been overturned.

The standard of refereeing in Scotland is dreadful but you're claiming these bad decisions happen to "us and only us" when it's clearly not the case and you want the club to speak out on the matter.

I really don't know when our support turned into this group of whinging wee bitches.

When we realised the dignified silence gets you fucked up the arse whilst protesting and campaigning about injustices appears to have entirely the opposite effect.

Including those rare apologies from Heads of Refereeing. 

[The Ibrox Derry 8,904]

1 minute ago, graeme_4 said:

With what purpose? 

What do you want the SFA / SPFL to do?

They've recinded the red.

The McGeogh, Stokes and McGregor incidents were seen by the ref so there's no recourse. 

Beaton has been demoted. 

Perhaps with the purpose of putting pressure on the other referees that come to Ibrox, that there every move will be scrutinized.

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,729]

3 minutes ago, graeme_4 said:

With what purpose? 

What do you want the board or SFA / SPFL to do?

They've recinded the red.

The McGeogh, Stokes and McGregor incidents were seen by the ref so there's no recourse. 

Beaton has been demoted. 

There is no proof he has been demoted.

This perception needs to stop unless there is a formal acknowledgement of such.

[LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,510]

The amount of paranoia on this forum coming from grown men is fucking embarrassing and the replies of "dignified silence" and "paranoid protestants" to try and laugh it off whenever it's mentioned to them is even worse.

Sections of our support are slowly morphing into tarriers and consistently playing the paranoid victim in ways that we used to mock them for. Maybe even worse.

It's fucking tragic.

[LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,510]

1 minute ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

When we realised the dignified silence gets you fucked up the arse whilst protesting and campaigning about injustices appears to have entirely the opposite effect.

Including those rare apologies from Heads of Refereeing. 

There's that "dignified silence" line again

[The Specky Forum Organiser 64,752]

1 minute ago, The Ibrox Derry said:

Perhaps with the purpose of putting pressure on the other referees that come to Ibrox, that there every move will be scrutinized.

Well that is absolutely tragic.

[Smile 26,610]

1 minute ago, Frank Harrison said:

Well that is absolutely tragic.

No, it's common sense lets even the playing field a little. Or lets get walked over.

[ianferguson 2,619]

30 minutes ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

What is the Boards battle which is greater than pitch invasions x 2 against us, hanging effigies of Rangers supporters, and a catalogue of deplorable decisions against us and us alone that cost us points on Saturday?

Which battle is deemed worth fighting by this Board?

All of the above , except the ref decisions.

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,729]

1 minute ago, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said:

The amount of paranoia on this forum coming from grown men is fucking embarrassing and the replies of "dignified silence" and "paranoid protestants" to try and laugh it off whenever it's mentioned to them is even worse.

Sections of our support are slowly morphing into tarriers and consistently playing the paranoid victim in ways that we used to mock them for. Maybe even worse.

It's fucking tragic.

Where were they in the grand schemes things compared to us when they were paranoid?

What did they do about it?

Dud they have at least some justification for it?

What did they do to address the matters causing their paranoia?

Are they still on the perceived receiving end? 

Where are they now compared to us in the grand scheme of things now?

 

Just because lots of folk feel repeatedly aggrieved doesn't make them paranoid, not does it make them wrong.

 

 

 

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,729]

Just now, ianferguson said:

All of the above.

So where is their fight?

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,729]

7 minutes ago, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said:

There's that "dignified silence" line again

You don't wish us to be dignified on this as opposed to "taig like" whatever that means?

You don't wish us to be silent on the matter?

[ianferguson 2,619]

Just now, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

So where is their fight?

I can't speak for them or excuse them.

[baxterboy 476]

46 minutes ago, Captain Hilts said:

Would achieve the square route of fuck all except attract ridicule. We need to get back to focusing on winning on the pitch.

As I previously mentioned in another thread, fielding the best defense in the world with messi and suarez on the forward line would achieve the square root of fuck all.

There is absolutely no way, as these last years show, that a fenian controlled sfa, refs, media, plod, local and natioanal government will ever allow us to be the power we once were in scottish football.

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,729]

4 minutes ago, ianferguson said:

I can't speak for them or excuse them.

No but you referred to picking your battles and said neither tlb or Beaton were the right battles. What would we have to endure for it to be the right battle?

 

[Courtyard Bear 41,357]

19 minutes ago, graeme_4 said:

With what purpose? 

What do you want the board or SFA / SPFL to do?

They've recinded the red.

The McGeogh, Stokes and McGregor incidents were seen by the ref so there's no recourse. 

Beaton has been demoted. 

The Ref has been deemed to have seen them if he gives a yellow or red. He let Stokes off with a throat hold on Jack, baldy wee cunt booting anything in Blueamd McGregor 2 neck high tackles that would get a couple weeks off in Rugby never mind football. 

[KeyserSoze 14,545]

When have a board, any board, issued regular statements on anything other than strategic issues, governance and funds?

Footballing "statements" re tactics, incidents and the like are always left to the management team - if it's in our best interest 

Why on earth should the board have anything to say about this matter ffs    

 

[LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,510]

14 minutes ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

You don't wish us to be dignified on this as opposed to "taig like" whatever that means?

You don't wish us to be silent on the matter?

I'll ask again for the 3rd time. What is it you want the club to say on this matter?

Why should we issue a statement about a red card being overturned when none of the other clubs are?

[ianferguson 2,619]

9 minutes ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

No but you referred to picking your battles and said neither tlb or Beaton were the right battles. What would we have to endure for it to be the right battle?

 

"What is the Boards battle which is greater than pitch invasions x 2 against us, hanging effigies of Rangers supporters,"

You posted this earlier and I agree the board should have acted on both.