Rick Roberts - Troublesome tribalism: does it matter who asks the questions?

[rabc10000 5,061]

2 minutes ago, SonOfLuther said:

There's more sincerity in unpaid taigs coming on here and being cunts imo.

 

It's about the only time they are honest as well

[SonOfLuther 3,400]

1 minute ago, rabc10000 said:

It's about the only time they are honest as well

👍

[backup 4,724]

1 minute ago, Bad Robot said:

Now I think about it I think the sfa need to appoint a senior Scottish judge like William Nimmo Smith and to report on any findings.

You mean the inquiry that was a private inquiry, not a Judicial one......of course you do 👍

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,728]

23 minutes ago, The Dude said:

Surely if you're campaigning to councillors you'd attend the council meeting to approve the march or make representations beyond 'we'll do our utmost to stop it'?

Prejudice?

Surely if you've any sense you apologise for repeatedly implying "utmost" is threatening.

Which you did due it referring to a PUL community. Because of imo your prejudice.

[Malvern 11,329]

1 hour ago, The Dude said:

That's the Scottish Schools FA and it was removed because the SSFA moved to their own website.

Fuck sake so the SFA has a seperate entity now?

[Bobby Hume 13,093]

10 minutes ago, The Dude said:

It was Falkirk council, but the point stands. Were you going to go to such lengths then surely you'd make some sort of representation at the relevant council meeting?

Regardless of the geographic area or council involved .... other than you assuming violence to be the only course of action from Loyalists ... my point stands ... that of going to court to have the already council passed decision overturned.

Quite simple really .... and this course of action is the kind of educated decision I would expect from the overwhelmingly law abiding Loyalist groups. 

🇬🇧

[Courtyard Bear 41,357]

43 minutes ago, SonOfLuther said:

This was a really good thread.

the dude has achieved his goal. 

[evenstevens 890]

3 hours ago, The Dude said:

So why isnt there the same clamour for punishment? Where are the calls for Chelsea to be shut down? 

Don't drag Chelsea into this. Chelsea "saved" our national team manager 😚

[Bluepeter9 5,167]

12 hours ago, Bad Robot said:

and another post by yourself that goes against everyone else 🤷‍♂️

No wonder people block you while you try troll them into an argument.

I award you nil points, and may god have mercy on your soul.

I believe I’m very consistent in my opinion of our paranoia - perhaps the only posters left on this site are the paranoid and myself! 

[Bluepeter9 5,167]

12 hours ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

List them.

Fuck me given we probably have 500k supporter or maybe more I suspect I’d struggle - and it would be a fucking long list - are you telling me that all politicians, councillors, lawyers, committee members are all celtic supporters and not one is a Rangers man? 😂 

[Bluepeter9 5,167]

9 hours ago, Courtyard Bear said:

😂😂 comedy gold from The Republican. 

Straight out of the ScumNP playbook, spout pish as fact and when it’s pointed out you are wrong just go la la la la. 

Fuck off back to your full spread of wee nic. 

Standard abusive response ! 

No change there 

[Malvern 11,329]

1 hour ago, Dickie said:

Priest in st.marys calton used to come out and lie in the road but he wasn’t violent.

A sleeping Priestman, should slow the traffick when they go over him.

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,728]

51 minutes ago, Bluepeter9 said:

Fuck me given we probably have 500k supporter or maybe more I suspect I’d struggle - and it would be a fucking long list - are you telling me that all politicians, councillors, lawyers, committee members are all celtic supporters and not one is a Rangers man? 😂 

No I'm asking you to back up the flippant (trolling) post you made. Go for say just 10 out of the 500k or so. Go on.

[To Be A Ranger 4,032]

4 hours ago, The Dude said:

So why isnt there the same clamour for punishment? Where are the calls for Chelsea to be shut down? 

You're flitting all over the place desperate to show the celtic paedo scandal is nothing different from anywhere else, and all you're doing is showing yourself up.

It's been shown that these people exist in every walk of life, but once found out they are reported to the relevant authorities, prosecuted and/or kicked out of the very environment they existed in. Unfortunately any decent person could be working or living next to one of these paedos without knowing it.

The thing that makes celtic so complicit in the child abuse is that they knew it was going on for decades yet continued to employ and do business with these folk.  BJK kicked Torbett up the arse 'cause that was the way things were dealt with in those days', but they then later welcomed him back into the fold, pictured at official celtic gatherings surrounded by major celtic men including BJK. Only celtic deal with things that way. No decent human being or organisation would dare be so blatant (except perhaps the Pope and his merry men). Big Jock Knew, those high up in the celtic hierarchy knew, the players knew! (6 celtic managers knew https://www.vanguardbears.co.uk/article.php?i=210&a=six-celtic-managers-knew-about-paedophilia-at-celtic-park…… ).

FFS it was referred to Macari's book and McNeil was quoted saying the abuse was an open secret.

For you to put the celtic paedophile scandal on a level par with a paedo being found to have worked at Hibs, Thistle etc is downright shameful on your part unless obviously they covered it up, and continued to do business with said paedo etc in the same manner as celtic did (and maybe still do). 

celtic deserve to be hounded for as long as it takes for them to acknowledge the part they played in the paedophile ring that existed within their ranks. No punishment would be hard enough. 

And whosoever shall offend one of these little ones that believe in me, it is better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he were cast into the sea.

[The Dude 20,026]

1 hour ago, backup said:

No, the law of the land applies to all not how associations decide they are to be administered, that is the remit of the courts.

Once you are fully comfortable with that very obvious analogy  enlightenment shall follow, incidentally do you agree that celtic, (never mind anyone else for their cover up of abuse is the subject matter) should be prosecuted to the full extent of the criminal code ?

Again, Ive never disputed that. Simply the relevance of the SSFA child protection framework to celtic. 

Yes. 100%. Anyone involved in the abuse, cover up or facilitation of ang abuse should be punished to the fullest extent and used to make an example of. Clubs cannot be allowed to wash their hands of it, regardless how they dress it up, however the idea of sporting sanctions seems pointless. Sanctions should include huge financial penalties

[The Dude 20,026]

1 hour ago, Bobby Hume said:

Regardless of the geographic area or council involved .... other than you assuming violence to be the only course of action from Loyalists ... my point stands ... that of going to court to have the already council passed decision overturned.

Quite simple really .... and this course of action is the kind of educated decision I would expect from the overwhelmingly law abiding Loyalist groups. 

🇬🇧

It wasn't already passed however. The comment was submitted as an objection to the parade taking place. 

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,728]

1 hour ago, Courtyard Bear said:

the dude has achieved his goal. 

He trolls well but that because he has no shame or embarrassment when caught out. Like the paedophile mob ironically (for clarity,  I mean Separate Entity FC not Chelsea, Hivs, Thistle or Hutchie vale) 👍

[The Dude 20,026]

1 hour ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

Surely if you've any sense you apologise for repeatedly implying "utmost" is threatening.

Which you did due it referring to a PUL community. Because of imo your prejudice.

What prejudice?

[The Dude 20,026]

1 hour ago, Malvern said:

Fuck sake so the SFA has a seperate entity now?

Lots.

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,728]

2 minutes ago, The Dude said:

What prejudice?

An assumption a particular group was threatening / abusive based on who they are not what they did or said. Prejudicial.

[Blue Avenger 22,567]

1 minute ago, The Dude said:

Again, Ive never disputed that. Simply the relevance of the SSFA child protection framework to celtic. 

Yes. 100%. Anyone involved in the abuse, cover up or facilitation of ang abuse should be punished to the fullest extent and used to make an example of. Clubs cannot be allowed to wash their hands of it, regardless how they dress it up, however the idea of sporting sanctions seems pointless. Sanctions should include huge financial penalties

So sporting sanctions are ok when you run out of money, but not for child rape, right?

Both ARE failures in management and governance. However, one is a serious criminal offence, the other is not. Guess which one?!

[The Dude 20,026]

21 minutes ago, Blue Avenger said:

So sporting sanctions are ok when you run out of money, but not for child rape, right?

Both ARE failures in management and governance. However, one is a serious criminal offence, the other is not. Guess which one?!

No. They dont fit for either imo