Amac9 2,060 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 1- Mcgregor 2- 3- Weir 4- Cuellar 5- Papac 6- Ferguson 7- Hemdani 8- Thomson 9- Boyd 10- Novo 11- Adam 12- McCulloch 14- Naismith 15- Gow 16- G.Smith 17- Burke 18- Miller 19- JCD 20- Beasley 21- Broadfoot 22- Webster 23- Dailly 24- 25- Alexander 26- S.Smith 27- Lafferty 28- Whittaker 29- Cousin 44- Emslie 46- Furman 47- Mcmillan 53- Fleck Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boab 73 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 Carlos has 4, thats all that really mattered to me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 Does no one want the number 13 - are we THAT superstitious ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
outlaw69uk 123 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 More interesting that 2 has been left spare, and, that Hemdani has 7 for me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amac9 2,060 Posted July 25, 2008 Author Share Posted July 25, 2008 Why is Fleck 53? He was 43 last season Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Newells Sexist Army 2 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 Velicka isn't there, and they won't take 7 off Hemdani just because there is the possibility he might leave. We haven't signed any midfielders to give his number to anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van Moyles 0 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 IS Miller doing the Zamarano trick of the 1+8 so he thinks he is the clubs number 9?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amac9 2,060 Posted July 25, 2008 Author Share Posted July 25, 2008 IS Miller doing the Zamarano trick of the 1+8 so he thinks he is the clubs number 9?? only 1 number 9 at our club Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huistra 0 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 :badger: the king has #4 :badger: MCulloch moving from 27 to 12 is a wierd one aswell Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huistra 0 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 IS Miller doing the Zamarano trick of the 1+8 so he thinks he is the clubs number 9?? I wish he would do the Zamorano trick of fucking retiring!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 IS Miller doing the Zamarano trick of the 1+8 so he thinks he is the clubs number 9?? He wanted to be number 10, but his maths is as good as his finishing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coopermania 1 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 Adam gets 11 ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the goal machine 7,811 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 Adam gets 11 ? He was 11 last season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy WATP 86 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 Lafferty - 27 = New McCulloch a striker who plays LW Fleck 53? Naismith is now 14 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 Squad numbers dont really bother me tbh, it's who is in the shirts that matters to me and that list is lacking majorly in quality. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coopermania 1 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 Adam gets 11 ? He was 11 last season. I know, but its shit :angry2: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BritishBear 34 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 I am sure Alexander was #13 last season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sneddon 6 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 http://www.rangers.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Sq...5~34780,00.html i dont understand why theres no mention of Velicka Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 http://www.rangers.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Sq...5~34780,00.html i dont understand why theres no mention of Velicka I do, the Rangers website is a complete and utter joke. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy 69 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 hah . saw someone the other day with the gers top with Cuellar 24 on back . ha Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark_ni 12 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 velicka is number 37. I never understand why we have such big numbers like 53 for fleck when 24 or 30 are available. Why do teams not just use the lower numbers up first. Bit stupid imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kplfishtank 4,662 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 im surprised they gave gow a number at all Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bear 25 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 Does no one want the number 13 - are we THAT superstitious ? It's because of "stairway 13" where the disaster happened. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirwattiesmith 7 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 can some1 give me a link, not that I don't belive you but I help the FIFA database and need proof of the new squad numbers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boab 73 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 http://www.rangers.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Sq...,5~5643,00.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts