Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted December 15, 2008 Share Posted December 15, 2008 1 Davis 1 0.50% 2 Bougherra 2 1.00% 3 Mendes 2 1.00% 4 Thomson 3 1.50% 5 Niguez 3 1.50% 6 Alexander 4 2.00% 7 Papac 4 2.00% 8 Edu 5 2.50% 9 Naismith 6 3.00% 10 Novo 7 3.50% 11 Boyd 7 3.50% 12 Lafferty 9 4.50% 13 Miller 9 4.50% 14 McGregor 16 8.00% 15 Ferguson 28 14.00% 16 Broadfoot 32 16.00% 17 Whittaker 38 19.00% 18 Weir 55 27.50% 19 Steven Smith 87 43.50% 20 DeBeasley 91 45.50% 21 Velicka 96 48.00% 22 Graham Smith 97 48.50% 23 Burke 123 61.50% 24 Hemdani 160 80.00% 25 Adam 164 82.00% 26 McCollough 172 86.00% 27 Darchiville 178 89.00% 28 Dailly 187 93.50% Sample size 200 The bottom 8 - 10 are the ones this poll participants would get rid of! and no real surprises (IMHO) First Team would be : (Assuming fit and based on popularity) Novo and Boyd had same number of votes - put Boyd in as Naismith was in)! Alexander Papac Bougherra Broadfoot Whittaker Davis Mendes Thomson Niguez Naismith Boyd Bench from: - (Plus U21 players) McGregor Weir Edu Lafferty Miller Novo Ferguson Surpises (In my view) - 13 people didn't vote to get rid of Dailly! 2 voted for Mendes Harsh on Graham Smith Marginally more people want Adam to stay than McCollough Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrms999 22 Posted December 15, 2008 Share Posted December 15, 2008 Good poll Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craigy 0 Posted December 15, 2008 Share Posted December 15, 2008 Harsh on Graeme Smith? The guys taking money for nothing and we have Alexander and McGregor. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NOLUWDC 1 Posted December 15, 2008 Share Posted December 15, 2008 I quite like that team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted December 15, 2008 Share Posted December 15, 2008 1 Davis 1 0.50% 2 Bougherra 2 1.00% 3 Mendes 2 1.00% 4 Thomson 3 1.50% 5 Niguez 3 1.50% 6 Alexander 4 2.00% 7 Papac 4 2.00% 8 Edu 5 2.50% 9 Naismith 6 3.00% I'd love to meet the people who voted for this selection of players Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fremlin 0 Posted December 15, 2008 Share Posted December 15, 2008 1 Davis 1 0.50% 2 Bougherra 2 1.00% 3 Mendes 2 1.00% 4 Thomson 3 1.50% 5 Niguez 3 1.50% 6 Alexander 4 2.00% 7 Papac 4 2.00% 8 Edu 5 2.50% 9 Naismith 6 3.00% 10 Novo 7 3.50% 11 Boyd 7 3.50% 12 Lafferty 9 4.50% 13 Miller 9 4.50% 14 McGregor 16 8.00% 15 Ferguson 28 14.00% 16 Broadfoot 32 16.00% 17 Whittaker 38 19.00% 18 Weir 55 27.50% 19 Steven Smith 87 43.50% 20 DeBeasley 91 45.50% 21 Velicka 96 48.00% 22 Graham Smith 97 48.50% 23 Burke 123 61.50% 24 Hemdani 160 80.00% 25 Adam 164 82.00% 26 McCollough 172 86.00% 27 Darchiville 178 89.00% 28 Dailly 187 93.50% I reckon you could easily lose everyone from 20 down and you wouldn't even notice the difference. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted December 15, 2008 Author Share Posted December 15, 2008 1 Davis 1 0.50% 2 Bougherra 2 1.00% 3 Mendes 2 1.00% 4 Thomson 3 1.50% 5 Niguez 3 1.50% 6 Alexander 4 2.00% 7 Papac 4 2.00% 8 Edu 5 2.50% 9 Naismith 6 3.00% I'd love to meet the people who voted for this selection of players Well I votes for Niguez but only based on the fact I dont like loan players - but if as you say elsewhere we have a fixed fee if we want to keep him - I probably wouldn't have. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnGalbraith 0 Posted December 15, 2008 Share Posted December 15, 2008 Harsh on Graeme Smith? The guys taking money for nothing and we have Alexander and McGregor. If you want to compete in European competition you need to have 3 registered senior goalkeepers. Smith is one of few senior goalies who is quite happy being 3rd choice and never playing, at the end of the day - someone's got to do it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManchestGer 347 Posted December 15, 2008 Share Posted December 15, 2008 No surprise Dailly was voted for most. Definitely true about 20 down, wouldnt notice if they were gone Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark. 69 Posted December 15, 2008 Share Posted December 15, 2008 1 Davis 1 0.50% 2 Bougherra 2 1.00% 3 Mendes 2 1.00% 4 Thomson 3 1.50% 5 Niguez 3 1.50% 6 Alexander 4 2.00% 7 Papac 4 2.00% 8 Edu 5 2.50% 9 Naismith 6 3.00% I'd love to meet the people who voted for this selection of players Timmy lhurkers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-Maestro 11,514 Posted December 15, 2008 Share Posted December 15, 2008 Why do people not understand the concept of a 3rd choice keeper? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnGalbraith 0 Posted December 15, 2008 Share Posted December 15, 2008 Why do people not understand the concept of a 3rd choice keeper? No idea. I've said it on here about 50 times when people rattle thier gums about showing G.Smith the door. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shnollyRFC 0 Posted December 15, 2008 Share Posted December 15, 2008 How can people justify voting for big Lee after his performance on Saturday?!? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasGers 96 Posted December 15, 2008 Share Posted December 15, 2008 Why do people not understand the concept of a 3rd choice keeper? No idea. I've said it on here about 50 times when people rattle thier gums about showing G.Smith the door. Right, and it's not like he's on a 30,000 a week deal or anything. Graeme Smith is the least of our worries. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott-RFC 308 Posted December 15, 2008 Share Posted December 15, 2008 McCollough Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeBlue 136 Posted December 15, 2008 Share Posted December 15, 2008 Why do people not understand the concept of a 3rd choice keeper? Indeed - main keeper gets injured - so we don't have a keeper on the bench? They do get sent off every so often. EDIT - but harsh on Miller IMO Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted December 16, 2008 Author Share Posted December 16, 2008 Why do people not understand the concept of a 3rd choice keeper? Indeed - main keeper gets injured - so we don't have a keeper on the bench? They do get sent off every so often. EDIT - but harsh on Miller IMO In some ways I was suprised only 9 voted for Miller to go - I would take that as an endorsement of his general acceptance as good for the team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueballss 2,972 Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 1 Davis 1 0.50% 2 Bougherra 2 1.00% 3 Mendes 2 1.00% 4 Thomson 3 1.50% 5 Niguez 3 1.50% 6 Alexander 4 2.00% 7 Papac 4 2.00% 8 Edu 5 2.50% 9 Naismith 6 3.00% I'd love to meet the people who voted for this selection of players :beer2: WTF Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
docspiderman 1,254 Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 Get rid of 16 to 28 would be my preference and then we could easily up the standard of our squad by using the wages saved to buy a quality right back, central defender and a decent left midfield option. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikke 0 Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 Harsh on Graeme Smith? The guys taking money for nothing and we have Alexander and McGregor. Most clubs have three goalkeepers in their squads (first team and reserves combined). Apparently they don´t consider Robinson good enough for first team football just yet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhempl10 0 Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 What is interesting here is that no one is creaming themselves for John Fleck! I can't see his name mentioned anywhere. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted December 17, 2008 Author Share Posted December 17, 2008 What is interesting here is that no one is creaming themselves for John Fleck! I can't see his name mentioned anywhere. I made the vote on First team squad only - while he gets to sit on the bench he is not in the actual first team squad - nor are any of the reserve team youth. Hence why Fleck is not on the list. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhempl10 0 Posted December 17, 2008 Share Posted December 17, 2008 What is interesting here is that no one is creaming themselves for John Fleck! I can't see his name mentioned anywhere. I made the vote on First team squad only - while he gets to sit on the bench he is not in the actual first team squad - nor are any of the reserve team youth. Hence why Fleck is not on the list. Fair enough but I don't think Aaron Niguez with one subsititue appearance to his name is really a 1st team squad member... so is he not a youth warming the bench? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazza 21 Posted December 17, 2008 Share Posted December 17, 2008 How can people justify voting for big Lee after his performance on Saturday?!? And him being able to play two positions too!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted December 17, 2008 Author Share Posted December 17, 2008 What is interesting here is that no one is creaming themselves for John Fleck! I can't see his name mentioned anywhere. I made the vote on First team squad only - while he gets to sit on the bench he is not in the actual first team squad - nor are any of the reserve team youth. Hence why Fleck is not on the list. Fair enough but I don't think Aaron Niguez with one subsititue appearance to his name is really a 1st team squad member... so is he not a youth warming the bench? I got the first team squad list from rangers.co.uk - so they treat him as a 1st team player - and the others as not. <_< Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts