the goal machine

I understand people sticking up for Foderingham but you're kidding yourself on if you don't think he's a problem right now. He's stuck behind a dodgy defence but that was a routine save. 

Foderingham
Tavernier Ball Wilson Wallace
Shiels Halliday Zelalem
McKay O'Halloran King
 

Yes, I'm saying that's why he 'retired'. 

Last minute offside winner please. Or a dodgy penalty, I'm not fussy.

McGregor vs. Diaz 2 and Aldo vs Edgar for the interim FW title confirmed for UFC 200. Not bad.

Aye. Have to imagine he'll get a new deal though.

A rematch in Belfast would be brilliant.

A rematch in Belfast would be brilliant.

A rematch in Belfast would be brilliant.

Aye they'd have a shot if they fought him together.

Fair play to the Broncos, their defence was outstanding. Really disappointed by the Panthers though, thought this year was their year. Von Miller was tremendous. 

A Graham Spiers column published on heraldscotland in December made a claim about an un-named member of the six-strong board of Rangers.
This presented a legal issue which had to be addressed and which was discussed at length, by all parties involved.
The issue was whether we could defend in court a contentious statement and the advice given was that we could not. Finally, on clear legal advice, we were left with no option other than to apologise and seek to draw a line under the matter.
After the apology was published we had to abide by it and the spirit in which it was published. Unfortunately that apology was then undermined and we had to take appropriate action.
Our titles have a long history of supporting quality journalism and defending free speech and robust comment. This made all the more difficult the action we had to take.
While one of our advertisers is on the board at Rangers that was never an issue and we shall continue to report and comment on the pressing issues of the day without fear or favour.
Magnus Llewellin,
Editor-in-Chief
Herald & Times Group

A Graham Spiers column published on heraldscotland in December made a claim about an un-named member of the six-strong board of Rangers.
This presented a legal issue which had to be addressed and which was discussed at length, by all parties involved.
The issue was whether we could defend in court a contentious statement and the advice given was that we could not. Finally, on clear legal advice, we were left with no option other than to apologise and seek to draw a line under the matter.
After the apology was published we had to abide by it and the spirit in which it was published. Unfortunately that apology was then undermined and we had to take appropriate action.
Our titles have a long history of supporting quality journalism and defending free speech and robust comment. This made all the more difficult the action we had to take.
While one of our advertisers is on the board at Rangers that was never an issue and we shall continue to report and comment on the pressing issues of the day without fear or favour.
Magnus Llewellin,
Editor-in-Chief
Herald & Times Group

A Graham Spiers column published on heraldscotland in December made a claim about an un-named member of the six-strong board of Rangers.
This presented a legal issue which had to be addressed and which was discussed at length, by all parties involved.
The issue was whether we could defend in court a contentious statement and the advice given was that we could not. Finally, on clear legal advice, we were left with no option other than to apologise and seek to draw a line under the matter.
After the apology was published we had to abide by it and the spirit in which it was published. Unfortunately that apology was then undermined and we had to take appropriate action.
Our titles have a long history of supporting quality journalism and defending free speech and robust comment. This made all the more difficult the action we had to take.
While one of our advertisers is on the board at Rangers that was never an issue and we shall continue to report and comment on the pressing issues of the day without fear or favour.
Magnus Llewellin,
Editor-in-Chief
Herald & Times Group

A Graham Spiers column published on heraldscotland in December made a claim about an un-named member of the six-strong board of Rangers.
This presented a legal issue which had to be addressed and which was discussed at length, by all parties involved.
The issue was whether we could defend in court a contentious statement and the advice given was that we could not. Finally, on clear legal advice, we were left with no option other than to apologise and seek to draw a line under the matter.
After the apology was published we had to abide by it and the spirit in which it was published. Unfortunately that apology was then undermined and we had to take appropriate action.
Our titles have a long history of supporting quality journalism and defending free speech and robust comment. This made all the more difficult the action we had to take.
While one of our advertisers is on the board at Rangers that was never an issue and we shall continue to report and comment on the pressing issues of the day without fear or favour.
Magnus Llewellin,
Editor-in-Chief
Herald & Times Group

They must have a group chat on Whatsapp that allows them all to let each other know when there's a conspiracy to highlight.

Your only job and you fucked it.

Ask Rab on Twitter! I didn't make the picture

You seem furious about the fact that we'd play an Arsenal youngster over Nicky Law in a cup game though. You don't think it could possibly help us in the future but if we didn't play loanees then we probably wouldn't get trusted with them again.
And it's not as if Zelalem is a liability. He had a good game today and is an asset to our squad.

So did I but could easily see how Lawler got the nod.

So did I but could easily see how Lawler got the nod.

I think Clark's fine as back-up but would much rather see Hardie start.

We said the same about Hearts last season and Hibs have now won 9 out of their last 10 I think. We can't afford to be complacent.

Disappointing result, thought for sure we'd get a second and go on to win it when we were all over them. Thought we made the subs too early as we were enjoying our best spell of the match at that time but that isn't to be blamed for Foderingham and Ball getting in each other's way at a corner.
Defensively we're still very shaky and we need to get that sorted sooner rather than later.
We're losing too many balls in midfield as well. Thought McGinn was the best player on the pitch and he's the type of player we need.

Disappointing result, thought for sure we'd get a second and go on to win it when we were all over them. Thought we made the subs too early as we were enjoying our best spell of the match at that time but that isn't to be blamed for Foderingham and Ball getting in each other's way at a corner.
Defensively we're still very shaky and we need to get that sorted sooner rather than later.
We're losing too many balls in midfield as well. Thought McGinn was the best player on the pitch and he's the type of player we need.