Blueofblood

No "fan" of Rangers votes for these cunts. Not one. 

If they're tackling sectarianism head on then they'll be shutting down every single religiously organised school in Scotland then? 
Yes? 
Maybe? 

What a fucking ridiculous appointment. We don't stand a chance. But while I'm at it I'd like to introduce the Scottish Government Child Safety Ambassadors.
 

Don't give the cunts ideas.

I'm just in from work and clicked onto this thread, I have basically gave a like to just about every comment that's been made, this is a diabolical appointment, any cunt that votes for these cunts can fuck off in my opinion,this Dorman cunt is a cunt of the highest order, can see a lot of punishment coming our way as per but conveniently miss they scum in the east end, someone with more know how that me needs to challenge the fairness and thought process in this appointment.
How it can be deemed fair and on a level playing field is ridiculous.

This Country and Glasgow sicken me to the pit
It absolutely stinks 

I understand that some people may say that a sectarian bigot will be investigating sectarian bigotry.....

How exactly does this sectarianism manifest itself? What practical, tangible,  recent evidence is there of it being a serious problem in Scottish society? Who are the people so troubled by it that they feel the need to form a cross-party Parliamentary group?

With the OBFA failing in it's intended target they're having another go it would seem.... 

That picture should be enough to have him removed from the position but I suspect it was used to get him the job.

Why are people unhappy he doesn't say anything wrong do you want him to say we have no chance in winning it? All he's said is they believe they can win which they should the reporter would've asked him he has to answer

GCC just now
 
 

I'm liking this and more of it please!

Well done to those involved at C1872 for taking this fight to the bastards, they have overstepped the line here so deserve to be shown up for what they have done.
It's clear discrimination against us that no other group within society would have to put up with.

Top stuff. Excellently worded statement. That's more like it. 

The snp does what it wants unchecked and we need to keep up the pressure to ensure fairness and parity.
Playing the sectarian card is dealt with excellently at the start of the letter and whilst it is admirable to not breach confidentiality..the scum we are up against have no moral code so perhaps after this is pooh poohed and they ignore it again we resort to the methods required in a fight with dirty bastards.

http://club1872.co.uk/news/club-1872-take-further-action-over-susan-aitken-and-david-mcdonald/
 
Quite right and more power to them. Good to see someone fighting our corner.
Hopefully this is the moment that those of a certain persuasion have finally overstepped the mark and are taken to task.

Fucking right in about them, for once I applaud c1872.

quite right and well done Club 1872. 

There's no fannying about here. I like the bit at the end "for the avoidance of doubt there is clear, documentary evidence that they intervened"
They obviously have that evidence as you dont report people without having something to back it up.

Club 1872 Reports Glasgow City Councillors to Standards Commissioner 
Following the disingenuous and irresponsible behaviour of Glasgow City Councillors, Susan Aitken and David McDonald over the past few days, Club 1872 has been left with no option but to report them, along with Councillor Stephen Dornan, to the Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland.
Despite finding the time to construct a letter to Rangers which was littered with inaccuracies, immediately leaking that letter to the press and then posting carefully selected confidential emails including private information on social media, neither Susan Aitken nor David McDonald have managed to respond to simple questions from Rangers, Club 1872, MSPs, fellow councillors, the general public or indeed their own constituents.
Incredibly, despite David McDonald publishing these emails and Susan Aitken confirming in her leaked letter that she had been briefed on the Fanzone proposal, Glasgow City Council has replied to our FOI request claiming they do not hold a single piece of information on this matter. We have immediately asked for a review of this response and if necessary will then refer our request to the Scottish Information Commissioner.
It comes as little surprise to us to see the pair attempt to characterise the wish for transparency and accountability as sectarianism. Playing this card is the go-to move for anyone who is taken to task over their own questionable actions towards our club and supporters. Doing so immediately ahead of an Old Firm game was beneath contempt.
Given the array of political views, religions and football allegiances represented by those who have publicly questioned them, their tactics in this instance can only be categorised as a desperate attempt to deflect from the simple issue here. Why did they intervene, outside of due process, to instruct Glasgow Life to remove their consent to use the Ibrox Complex pitch for a match day Fanzone?
The issue of the objections by Stephen Dornan and the Ibrox and Cessnock Community Council is a complete red herring. The correct forum for these objections to be considered was the licensing hearing. We do not believe that the objections had any merit - and in the case of the community council were lodged due to misinformation provided by Stephen Dornan - but the place to address them was the hearing, where Rangers would have had the opportunity to respond directly to any concerns. This hearing was stopped only because of the intervention of the Council Leader and her deputy.
There is nothing in the emails leaked by David McDonald, which pre-date the incident in question by over 2 weeks, that disproves what we know to have happened. Their tactic of trying to muddy the waters by releasing carefully selected emails, whilst FOI requests are refused, is a clear attempt to mislead the public as to their role in this matter. We will not breach confidentiality by posting emails on the internet but for the avoidance of doubt there is clear, documentary evidence that they intervened.
We look forward to the truth of this matter emerging after a thorough investigation into these councillors and the receipt of FOI material so far denied to us.
Issued by Supporters Voice Limited, a Club 1872 company
Club 1872
 
 

There is no place to start with you, you're just fucking weird, fuck off and follow some other club.

Fuck that, he has a complaint that needs to be looked at but won't be as it did not bring a card so he is highlighting it in another way. Why the fuck do we care what the refs think? They haven't given a shit about us for years and are not going to be now so what have the club to lose by highlighting shit decisions?
Oh sorry I forgot
Dignified silence!
Shut up Ryan!

And this cunt is for the bin!

If the 4th official calls it w foul, he has  a case.
Clearly backed-up by his manager, who can see the shit clearly, and will stand for none of it.
Also remember that it was the Paedos' campaign against the refs that led to this.
For folk to say "Taig-like behaviour" I would say this... if that is how you effect change in your favour, in a rigged game: get the fuck on with it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!