marmalade1872 40 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 If there's only so much that can be said at this point, then why the need to open the other thread. Its nothing against you mate, but these threads are a breeding ground for tarriers.just wondering when i read your post ,is there a defination of the word tarrier in the dictionary as i used it once in a game of scrabble and got some queer looks. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El-Hadji Spit RFC 733 Posted December 21, 2011 Author Share Posted December 21, 2011 If there's only so much that can be said at this point, then why the need to open the other thread. Its nothing against you mate, but these threads are a breeding ground for tarriers.we should take it as a compliment that they choose to come onto our site and read our threads, they clearly want to read about the largest club in Scotland. We brought this story to the fold, its only a matter of time before its common knowledge... most transfer threads remain open without any concrete information... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guardian 4,281 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 There's been no official word on this, so I'll hold off on buying any of it.For all we know Darryl King saw the thread on here the other day with the rumours on it.It's time the club confirmed or denied it. They could sort this out with a simple statement.Tims must be shiting it though. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef 436 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 I cant see nowt anywhere in the pape rs, I'll wait for something more informative on the situation, looks like more than one rumour makes a truth to some, as good as it would be I feel dubious about the whole thing Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turnberry18 3,204 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 There's been no official word on this, so I'll hold off on buying any of it.For all we know Darryl King saw the thread on here the other day with the rumours on it.It's time the club confirmed or denied it. They could sort this out with a simple statement.Tims must be shiting it though.There is no way he would have based his belief on that thread. Whatever we think of Daryl, he has credible sources at Ibrox, and so does the originator of that thread from a few days ago. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebellsareblue82 15 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 The Girls Brigade will be getting the F@*k HMRC banner made up post haste lol. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
will_1974 204 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 I've said this many times before. Whyte will put us into administration rather than pay the tax bill. The leverage of this will ensure a deal is made. Quite simply Rangers exploited a tax loophole. Many large companies did so in a similar manner. The success rate of this type of case is quoted as being 4%. Most cases are settled. The delay has obviously been to facilitate this.I expect a deal for between 8 - 12 million. No inside knowledge just applying my own logic! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef 436 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 There's been no official word on this, so I'll hold off on buying any of it.For all we know Darryl King saw the thread on here the other day with the rumours on it.It's time the club confirmed or denied it. They could sort this out with a simple statement.Tims must be shiting it though.Am I right when I say all that someone on here needs to do is mention anyone's name within ibrox who may be in the know then that is classed as a goer, or do others on here know said/named person, which clarify this, I find it strange we have this rumour which some seem to believe yet another started last night. And it was an obvious taig although not as well thought out.Saying that it give a whyte crimbo a whole new meaning Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marmalade1872 40 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 I've said this many times before. Whyte will put us into administration rather than pay the tax bill. The leverage of this will ensure a deal is made. Quite simply Rangers exploited a tax loophole. Many large companies did so in a similar manner. The success rate of this type of case is quoted as being 4%. Most cases are settled. The delay has obviously been to facilitate this.I expect a deal for between 8 - 12 million. No inside knowledge just applying my own logic!any advance on 8_12 million then Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingtom28 8 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 lets hope its true. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennis 1,011 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 I've said this many times before. Whyte will put us into administration rather than pay the tax bill. The leverage of this will ensure a deal is made. Quite simply Rangers exploited a tax loophole. Many large companies did so in a similar manner. The success rate of this type of case is quoted as being 4%. Most cases are settled. The delay has obviously been to facilitate this.I expect a deal for between 8 - 12 million. No inside knowledge just applying my own logic!Is this numbers plucked out of thin air? And what logic did you use to get these figures? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turnberry18 3,204 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 I've said this many times before. Whyte will put us into administration rather than pay the tax bill. The leverage of this will ensure a deal is made. Quite simply Rangers exploited a tax loophole. Many large companies did so in a similar manner. The success rate of this type of case is quoted as being 4%. Most cases are settled. The delay has obviously been to facilitate this.I expect a deal for between 8 - 12 million. No inside knowledge just applying my own logic!Not quite true. It was not a loophole. In many ways Rangers were trying to make matters eaier Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
will_1974 204 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 Not quite true. It was not a loophole. In many ways Rangers were trying to make matters eaierI would describe it as a loophole as it was a legitimate way of providing an employee benefits . (Generally regarded as a loophole if you google EBT's)The figure of 8 - 12 million is a guess, did Arsenal not settle on 10% of the claim. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turnberry18 3,204 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 I would describe it as a loophole as it was a legitimate way of providing an employee benefits . (Generally regarded as a loophole if you google EBT's)The figure of 8 - 12 million is a guess, did Arsenal not settle on 10% of the claim.I'm sorry, but it was not quite a 'loophole' as such; and I think this is a crucial matter that has been used in the defence of Rangers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef 436 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 I'll ask again, is all that is needed is a name within ibrox, and Is it clarified by someone who knows them? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
will_1974 204 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 I'm sorry, but it was not quite a 'loophole' as such; and I think this is a crucial matter that has been used in the defence of Rangers.Ok, agree to disagree. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El-Hadji Spit RFC 733 Posted December 21, 2011 Author Share Posted December 21, 2011 I'll ask again, is all that is needed is a name within ibrox, and Is it clarified by someone who knows them?is that all!!!! mate you have to think about the reasons why this aint in the public domain yet, if i was to mention names 1) it would place the people who told me in a very difficult position and 2) would be morally wrong.I've shared what i have to let my fellow bears know that there will be good news on the horizon, i know it will remain a a tough one to swallow until something more concrete is displayed... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guardian 4,281 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 Presumably after the way this rumour is gathering pace, reporters will be hitting sources and Ibrox for some sort of confirmation or denial.I'm just a bit concerned that just as there is a news story about HMRC doing deals, suddenly we get these rumours.Still reeks of timmy getting a wee idea.On the plus side, it's causing them far more grief than us. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef 436 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 is that all!!!! mate you have to think about the reasons why this aint in the public domain yet, if i was to mention names 1) it would place the people who told me in a very difficult position and 2) would be morally wrong.I've shared what i have to let my fellow bears know that there will be good news on the horizon, i know it will remain a a tough one to swallow until something more concrete is displayed...I don't want names trust me, but, surely someone on here knows them perhaps and is this kind of thing clarified, I'll admit I'm dubious and rightfully soBit it just seems all to easy to mention a name that people are aware of then all of a sudden it's a credible sourceIs that all!!!!! Well it is kinda important to some Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rokcy 4 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 I see the taig infested rtc site has been panicked into starting another thread to cast doubt on any settlement, unfortunately for his unwashed disciples it more or less contradicts all that has gone before.The part from the alleged sale agreement is so full of contradictions, so much so as to be meaningless probably written by Oliver Reed when he was pished.Wonder when rtc will break cover and declare the mhanks well and truly tangoed. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,610 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 What will that Scumbag from Rangers tax case do now with his time if this happens, him and his heinz 57 family will be back to begging on the streets where they belong. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
effindelicious 10 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 I am doubtful that HMRC will allow a reduced settlement - in the last two days they have been villified in the mainstream press for allowing such deals in the past - you cannot be half guilty of not paying full liabilities, and they will now demand the full liability. That does, however, assume that HMRC's case is watertight. Cameron et al will be under severe pressure to extract full liability; a ready made excuse for the govt is the need for everyone to pay taxes fully in these straightened times. I fear the worst is yet to come... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gillete 1,338 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 The green goblin brigade will have to change the RIP rangers banners for the 28thYou can picture wee Declan , Aidan and John Paul Mary magdalene murphy with their paint brushes as the news filters through Declan " you heard those pure shite rumours Aidan "Aidan " no , what is it "Declan " those bams at the wee tax office are dealing with the rangurs and they urny paying fur cheatin "" yer fucking jokin Declan , what ur we gonna do wi these banners for the game noo " Aidan launches paintbrush across the living room smashing the regi blinker clock off the wall Declan " I fuckin hate those H*** , it pure no fair man , I really isnae "Aidan " but but but but...phil said everything would be right" Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turnberry18 3,204 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 I am doubtful that HMRC will allow a reduced settlement - in the last two days they have been villified in the mainstream press for allowing such deals in the past - you cannot be half guilty of not paying full liabilities, and they will now demand the full liability. That does, however, assume that HMRC's case is watertight. Cameron et al will be under severe pressure to extract full liability; a ready made excuse for the govt is the need for everyone to pay taxes fully in these staraightened times. I fear the worst is yet to come...They have not been criticised for that at all. Their relationship with large corporations, which is not the likes of Rangers, has been heavily questioned. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef 436 Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 is that all!!!! mate you have to think about the reasons why this aint in the public domain yet, if i was to mention names 1) it would place the people who told me in a very difficult position and 2) would be morally wrong.I've shared what i have to let my fellow bears know that there will be good news on the horizon, i know it will remain a a tough one to swallow until something more concrete is displayed...such a secret and not for public domain u plaster it all over a fans forum anaw mate, dubious is an understatementThe press will likely see whats what, they have sources Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.