Shane 338 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 The administrators have been in contact with Assembly President, Andy Kerr, this evening (Sunday) and have confirmed that the announcement of a preferred bidder was advanced towards a conclusion late last week but, unexepctedly, there is a key process issue that needs to be resolved before the announcement can be made. They have been working on that over the weekend and hope to have it resolved this coming week. This seems to completely contradict the motives of the "joint statement" released hours ago. If this info was known, why was the previous statement ever released in the first?The RSA also does not list the previous statement on its facebook page, but has posted this... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef 436 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 Seems some have their preffered option and to hell with doing whats right by rangers, what's in this for people Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 for feck sake.....consider my benifet of the doubt to the earlier statement withdrawn.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
4MenHadADream 122 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 I would assume for the RSA to release this apparently contradictory statement, then Andy Kerr must have been given some strong assurances that whatever the issues holding up a deal are indeed genuine Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
spireblue 229 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 yeah the key process issue is they are waiting for their half million quid cheque. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 What are these groups actually playing at? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianb1547 3,767 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 a united front ?? don't think so Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam2102 577 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 i interpreted it as: admins saw previous statement.admins contacted RSAno big deal. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane 338 Posted April 15, 2012 Author Share Posted April 15, 2012 i interpreted it as: admins saw previous statement.admins contacted RSAno big deal.Don't disagree, but should be clarified, no? RSA never posted previous statement but posted this...? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam2102 577 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 Don't disagree, but should be clarified, no? RSA never posted previous statement but posted this...?yeah im not too sure. im at the stage where im taking all statements with a pinch of salt. my gut tells me we'll find out on tuesday Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 i interpreted it as: admins saw previous statement.admins contacted RSAno big deal.AK has access to the Administrators. Why not call them first? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam2102 577 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 AK has access to the Administrators. Why not call them first?not got a scooby.maybe it is a bigger deal than i thought Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marco Negri's Beard 1,423 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 Calamitous Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bombaybadboy08 15,660 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 A bit embarrassing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane 338 Posted April 15, 2012 Author Share Posted April 15, 2012 RST says it's a response. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nachothelegend 1,932 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 It worrys me if they arent singing off the same Hymn Sheet. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wearethepeople1 3,897 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 All these groups need to come together at times like this, not try and get personal gain.Sort it out lads, bigger picture here Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bombaybadboy08 15,660 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 RST says it's a response.It's a response that indicates all they had to do was ask in the first place Deary me, Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef 436 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 Do forums like this hold more weight over getting points accross and the likes or for gauging opinions considering the traffic our clubs fan sites gather, other than groups like mentioned within Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stefmartin16 121 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 I heard from a usually well connected source that tbk are preferred bidders, just a couple of things to iron out. I personally hoped for the Singapore consortium. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane 338 Posted April 15, 2012 Author Share Posted April 15, 2012 Rangers Supporters @rangersfctrust@ShaneANicholson Or another delaying tactic. Time will tell.Shane Nicholson @ShaneANicholson@rangersfctrust Well that's jumping to conclusions, isn't it? AK seems to be well in on the info from the admins from past releases----------------------------RST: WTF... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polo 1,433 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 I love a bit of unity and clarity - not had any yet from any body scince Feb 14th BUT Unity and Clarity - thats what we need! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTP 221 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 I heard from a usually well connected source that tbk are preferred bidders, just a couple of things to iron out. I personally hoped for the Singapore consortium.Who? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane 338 Posted April 15, 2012 Author Share Posted April 15, 2012 Shane Nicholson @ShaneANicholson@rangersfctrust This is what I was saying earlier: what's the evidence of a purposeful delay? If there is, shouldn't all supporters know?---------------------Quick to reply that this was a response to the strongly-worded joint statement from earlier. Not so quick to answer questions that could alleviate fears over motive behind. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.