Div 3, 2 and 1 titles

[broxi74 127]

I won't be embarrassing myself by celebrating Rangers winning the Third division. Or the Second or First.

al be celebrating promotion aswell, but its one thing celebrating promotion and another thing when you try and count it in your league titles.

[2daludaludalu 390]

I would say 57 just to wind the rat bastards up.

[GeneralCartmanLee 313]

You can only beat what is put in front of you so if we win the league then it gets counted.

We will be in the new spl next season so div 2 and 1 won't matter

[MrT 173]

If as expected, we win div 3, 2 and 1 to get back into the SPL (although I still think the league will be restructured and we'll be in SPL2 or nearer the top flight before then), would these be added to the 54 titles?

So by the time we get to the SPL would we have 57 titles or do folk only really see the top flight titles as ones to add to the number?

Look if you are not a Tim you are doing a great job convincing people you are.....

Stop posting shit like this you fool, a league title is a title and therefore it will be 57. Idiot!

[FaslaneBear 11]

The 54 is League Championships, not just in top leagues but overall. So 57 is the correct answer.

[PRW. 5,631]

why is this even a thread? if septic won div 1 and added it to there titles ad laugh ma fukin balls off... ffs man!

Agreed. Will still be 54 in my book, we're not going to win these 3 divisions then another 3 SPLs and have 6 stars.

[PRW. 5,631]

I won't be embarrassing myself by celebrating Rangers winning the Third division. Or the Second or First.

Don't talk shite, if you don't celebrate your team winning a league because you think we are too good to win they leagues you best catch a grip.

[Rfc#1. 1,877]

57

[Manno 11]

I'd consider it 54, as they are different titles to that of the SPL (including the old First/Premier Division).

[Ryan_1 1,136]

54 for me.

We've won 54 major league titles, the lower aren't major league titles in my eyes. I see them merely as stepping stones.

[CoatbridgeBear 7,113]

Well if we win the SPL is that 4 in a row ?

[Big Al 55 9,273]

54 for me, it is always worded as major honours.

[Big Al 55 9,273]

Well if we win the SPL is that 4 in a row ?

No because we didn't win it this year, had we won it this year, been liquidated, returned and won it again then I would have been shouting 5 iar

[CoatbridgeBear 7,113]

No because we didn't win it this year, had we won it this year, been liquidated, returned and won it again then I would have been shouting 5 iar

[harlands plater 16,988]

Don't talk shite, if you don't celebrate your team winning a league because you think we are too good to win they leagues you best catch a grip.

That's how I feel about it, I'm as entitled to an opinion as you are.

As far as I'm concerned, the sooner the next few years are over and done with the better.

[Senna 735]

54 for me. Top division only. That's what all the previous 54 are for.

[Prince of Orange 84]

Every Rangers supporter will celebrate winning any division.

Winning the 'League' means to be top in the whole country, the 1st, 2nd and 3rd divisions aren't leagues, they are divisions of a league. If we do win them then they will be recorded as winning the divisional titles not the whole league, the exception being the 1st division.

The SFL is a league in its own merit with the spl a different league of 1 division (which is technically correct as it split from the SFL) which makes winning the 1st Division technically a title to be added to anybody's list as its winning the SFL outright.

My own point of view is I will celebrate winning any game and any division but I think only winning the SFL top flight and the spl should be added to titles and divisional wins should be recorded as just that, divisional.

So for me it would be 55 titles.

[GlasgowsBlue 329]

57

[montana100 335]

Yes, a title is a title. We can only play what ever title they put in front of us. 54 and still going strong.

[Crespie6 334]

If as expected, we win div 3, 2 and 1 to get back into the SPL (although I still think the league will be restructured and we'll be in SPL2 or nearer the top flight before then), would these be added to the 54 titles?

So by the time we get to the SPL would we have 57 titles or do folk only really see the top flight titles as ones to add to the number?

i would argue that any title that does not include both Rangers and PS in the standings does not count. both of us should really be able to win any leagure if the other isnt in it. just because the SPL clubs are slightly better than the Div 3 clubs doesnt mean they are actually going to challenge.

so basically our league wins and theirs should not count.

[Prince of Orange 84]

i would argue that any title that does not include both Rangers and PS in the standings does not count. both of us should really be able to win any leagure if the other isnt in it. just because the SPL clubs are slightly better than the Div 3 clubs doesnt mean they are actually going to challenge.

so basically our league wins and theirs should not count.

So what's the point in playing the game if you're not going to count wins just because you can't play 1 particular team?

[Crespie6 334]

So what's the point in playing the game if you're not going to count wins just because you can't play 1 particular team?

i would say they still count, but just not on top of the current 'top-flight' wins. the two biggest teams in the country are playing in different divisions, with sub-standard opposition making up the rest of the league - i'm not trying to be offensive, just going on the facts. both teams will walk their prespective leagues.

[ClintonGrey 365]

I certainly wouldn't count them, just as we don't count the ones through the war (unlike them) it's a matter of sporting integrity.

[.Williamson. 82,417]

54.

They'll be counted as more silverware and nothing else by me.

[WilliamFyfe 1,438]

Surely it's 57?