simon 1,744 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Just so that everyone is clear, I don't support either side. I'm only interested in the football side of things, I pay for me and my dad's season tickets, we go every other Saturday have a few pints get a pie and watch the game, that's it. I can't be bothered with the tit-for-tat bullshit that occupies the running of our club. Now, saying that, I want to know what the difference is between Dave King and the Easdales/Wallace etc, because from where I'm sat the only difference is Dave King has put money into the club, a hell of a lot at that, and the folk running us at the moment have only taken money out. I'm not including the most recent loan as money in as it is being repaid with interest. Can someone explain, why on here Dave King seems to be the bad guy for some and the current board are the good guys? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Do we need another thread on this ffs? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 This should be in the boardroom forum mr moderator Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaiser1041 9,088 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Just so that everyone is clear, I don't support either side. I'm only interested in the football side of things, I pay for me and my dad's season tickets, we go every other Saturday have a few pints get a pie and watch the game, that's it. I can't be bothered with the tit-for-tat bullshit that occupies the running of our club. Now, saying that, I want to know what the difference is between Dave King and the Easdales/Wallace etc, because from where I'm sat the only difference is Dave King has put money into the club, a hell of a lot at that, and the folk running us at the moment have only taken money out. I'm not including the most recent loan as money in as it is being repaid with interest. Can someone explain, why on here Dave King seems to be the bad guy for some and the current board are the good guys?people seem to pick a side on most subjects on the board rather than see what's good or bad about both sides.if this is Dave kings way of pushing his plans for us through then so be it but at this moment I'm on the fence. I will renew and I will be putting my money into the club as I've done all my life. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennistoun Rangers 426 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Just so that everyone is clear, I don't support either side. I'm only interested in the football side of things, I pay for me and my dad's season tickets, we go every other Saturday have a few pints get a pie and watch the game, that's it. I can't be bothered with the tit-for-tat bullshit that occupies the running of our club. Now, saying that, I want to know what the difference is between Dave King and the Easdales/Wallace etc, because from where I'm sat the only difference is Dave King has put money into the club, a hell of a lot at that, and the folk running us at the moment have only taken money out. I'm not including the most recent loan as money in as it is being repaid with interest. Can someone explain, why on here Dave King seems to be the bad guy for some and the current board are the good guys?You don't support either side yet title your post that. The current board and GW asked for 120 days to review the business prior to fixing the business before going to raise funds in a likely share issue. Yet a former director during our disgraceful business practises, who gives Republican Brits abroad interviews, wanted us liquidated and to bow down and ask for forgiveness from venomous scum that despise us, demands he is allowed to invest now we should throw a hissyfit and act like mongs for the sake of it? Wanker of a man. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEPPS BOY 74,697 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 I'd have preferred Dave King to be in charge at Rangers but I think his spiel yesterday was out of order..Why doesn't he just buy the club he proclaims to love instead of encouraging fans to destroy it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehost 11,061 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 without being rude how can you possibly post 20000 times on here, be a mod and yet not have a clue about such things?Your best bet it to not read forums, do a bit of research, think about things for yourself and make up your own mind.Your starting point should be thisif your OP is correct it would be safe to assume that a large proportion of folk posting are mad.so---- are they mad?if yes ignore themif no then maybe what you have described in your OP is not an accurate reflection of reality Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonok 1,245 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Just so that everyone is clear, I don't support either side. I'm only interested in the football side of things, I pay for me and my dad's season tickets, we go every other Saturday have a few pints get a pie and watch the game, that's it. I can't be bothered with the tit-for-tat bullshit that occupies the running of our club.Now, saying that, I want to know what the difference is between Dave King and the Easdales/Wallace etc, because from where I'm sat the only difference is Dave King has put money into the club, a hell of a lot at that, and the folk running us at the moment have only taken money out.I'm not including the most recent loan as money in as it is being repaid with interest.Can someone explain, why on here Dave King seems to be the bad guy for some and the current board are the good guys?I dont understand it either m8 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 I'd have preferred Dave King to be in charge at Rangers but I think his spiel yesterday was out of order..Fraternising with 3 names is even more out of order Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEPPS BOY 74,697 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Fraternising with 3 names is even more out of orderRidiculous.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon 1,744 Posted February 27, 2014 Author Share Posted February 27, 2014 without being rude how can you possibly post 20000 times on here, be a mod and yet not have a clue about such things?Your best bet it to not read forums, do a bit of research, think about things for yourself and make up your own mind.Your starting point should be thisif your OP is correct it would be safe to assume that a large proportion of folk posting are mad.so---- are they mad?if yes ignore themif no then maybe what you have described in your OP is not an accurate reflection of realityWhat does a post count have to do with knowing the inner workings of running our football club? I wanted to know the answers to something that was bothering me, so I asked it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehost 11,061 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 What does a post count have to do with knowing the inner workings of running our football club? I wanted to know the answers to something that was bothering me, so I asked it.It means you have been around a forum long enough to have read numerous posts and articles on the very subject you seek answers on. Unless, of course, you spend your time in OT.I'd give you your answers but then again someone else will be along within 2 minutes to gives you totally opposing answers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
j1mgg 3,766 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 A lot of it has to come down to the way that people handle their business, and the way Dave King has gone about trying to acquire Rangers is a joke, seems like he wants to get it as cheap as possible and if that mean another admin and fans losing money again he doesn't care.His plan doesn't seem that great either where it sounds like we will be going back to the old way of overspending to try and keep up with other teams, rather than produce and buy young talent to sell on.The current board/major shareholders are trying to get spending under control in a way that we can be self sustainable, and I believe this is when they would make their money selling their shares. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,070 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 What have the easedales taken out of the club? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
True Azure 1,414 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Fraternising with 3 names is even more out of orderI take it you'll be able to post evidence of this claim, so we all can see the truth???????? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheQueensEleven 1,355 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 > King's loss of £20m in the oldco is widely disputed> King has adopted a tactic of scaremongering, using fear to turn the fans against the current board> King has zero shares> King has stated for the last 2 years he wants to invest, but hasn't done so even when given ample opportunity> King has outright lied about talks with the board and about offering an interest free loan of £1m which was supposedly rejected> King has been outspoken against almost every board member since admin and he seems unwilling to stop until he's in power> King has ran to newspapers on a monthly basis to declare that the following month will be administration> King demanding Rangers apologise for the EBT's> King that was on the oldco board that spunked millions and then sold us on for a pound to googly eyes Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlCapone 7,678 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Just so that everyone is clear, I don't support either side. I'm only interested in the football side of things, I pay for me and my dad's season tickets, we go every other Saturday have a few pints get a pie and watch the game, that's it. I can't be bothered with the tit-for-tat bullshit that occupies the running of our club. Now, saying that, I want to know what the difference is between Dave King and the Easdales/Wallace etc, because from where I'm sat the only difference is Dave King has put money into the club, a hell of a lot at that, and the folk running us at the moment have only taken money out. I'm not including the most recent loan as money in as it is being repaid with interest. Can someone explain, why on here Dave King seems to be the bad guy for some and the current board are the good guys?When did Dave King put money in? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvern 11,329 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 To be fair Simon I agree with the Host and Dennistoun Rangers on this, the title of your post does in fact pin your flag to the colours of one side and is not as you proclaim to be neutral.As for your answer as to why DK is the bad guy, he has had enough chances after his court case in SA to throw some money into the club and it has not been forthcoming. The reasons could be numerous but I do not believe the rumours that he would have given the club a £1Mil interest free loan, there is as usual no proof of this. Let's not even talk about the various interviews he will willing give to the DR (other certain ex board members are fond of this) and now 3 names.A man wanting our club on the cheap or a CEO of our board (not current crop) who is trying to see how he can sort things out and has asked for time is certainly the better option for me. It was not on GW's last watch that our club went into financial issues now was it? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 What have the easedales taken out of the club?22 milllllllion poundßssssssss.spivtastic. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robespierre 589 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 When did Dave King put money in?Have you been living under a rock for the last 15 years? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,070 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 22 milllllllion poundßssssssss.spivtastic.Forgot about that gogzy Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlCapone 7,678 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Have you been living under a rock for the last 15 years?No, why would you say that? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robespierre 589 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 It's been well publicized over the last 3 years that King invested £20m in 2000. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nachothelegend 1,932 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Reason is DK suggested we starve the Club.Thats why. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nachothelegend 1,932 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 It's been well publicized over the last 3 years that King invested £20m in 2000.Oh he never stops talking about it.Ever thought he may just want to recoup some of it?Makes you wonder. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.