Rangers_no1 33,105 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 Can't believe people are actually falling for the QR code shambles that started from a Djokovic hater. One minute it shows negative, next minute positive. Der Spiegel even claimed results were from 26th and not 16th and then had to back down as was the download date. Bad Robot 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
left winger 14,657 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 33 minutes ago, esquire8 said: They make it up as they go along. After all this I doubt he'd want to go back. Being on 9 (I think) titles, I reckon he’d still want to go back , even if he doesn’t get to play this year. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
offminorthreat 1,467 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 Guy has blatantly ignored the rules, sought some dodgy exemption which government are under no obligation to grant and then has been caught out lying on his papers. He should be deported and strip him of his 2021 title while they are at it for a laugh. If a regular person tried on the same they would have no sympathy. He's a nut job. I genuinely fear the crowd reaction if he plays. The 82% poll to deport him if anything is favourable - among those that have the financial means and interest to attend the AO it guess it would be 95%++. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangers_no1 33,105 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 2 minutes ago, left winger said: Being on 9 (I think) titles, I reckon he’d still want to go back , even if he doesn’t get to play this year. Hopefully its still only vaccinated allowed next year. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Nosed Babe 20,991 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 Serves him right for thinking he is above the law. billscott and Zetland 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Creampuff 22,628 Posted January 14, 2022 Author Popular Post Share Posted January 14, 2022 Imagine getting knocked out of a tournament for missing two shots? 32Blue, Jamie0202, Blue Nosed Babe and 2 others 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creampuff 22,628 Posted January 14, 2022 Author Share Posted January 14, 2022 Genuinely no idea why the courts are playing ball with the scheduling of the appeal btw. A game of tennis expediting the court process… Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Nosed Babe 20,991 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 1 hour ago, Creampuff said: Genuinely no idea why the courts are playing ball with the scheduling of the appeal btw. A game of tennis expediting the court process… No a game of a rich over privileged arsehole who can pay lawyers top dollar..... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,512 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 3 hours ago, Blue Nosed Babe said: You forget the original court decision was based on procedural error and not the substance of the case. He won on a technicality. what was the procedural error ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,512 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 3 hours ago, Blue Nosed Babe said: Lying on a legal document is not a typo. is human error lying ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,512 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 3 hours ago, The Dude said: A typo is spelling a word wrong - not attempting to deceive by omission. it’s also human error and your text ‘device by omission’ is just speculation Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,512 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 3 hours ago, don logan said: It's absolutely not speculation. It's all fact. Don't let your views on vaccinations cloud your understanding of what has went on here. The judge looked at the facts and the law and you’re quoting newspapers on the internet. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 1 minute ago, Bad Robot said: it’s also human error and your text ‘device by omission’ is just speculation Human error is putting the wrong date down not forgetting you'd travelled to two different countries just a few weeks earlier when you'd apparently tested positive for Covid. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,512 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 2 minutes ago, The Dude said: Human error is putting the wrong date down not forgetting you'd travelled to two different countries just a few weeks earlier when you'd apparently tested positive for Covid. You’re now conflating the issue with his positive test unless it wasn’t added that to the visa application, was that the case? Human error is by the admin who completed the form but he should have checked it but when you’re flying in and out different countries every week then this is the sort of things that your staff do so you can focus on the job at hand. Do people actually think sports stars are browsing Skyscanner 😂😂 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 1 minute ago, Bad Robot said: You’re now conflating the issue with his positive test unless it wasn’t added that to the visa application, was that the case? Human error is by the admin who completed the form but he should have checked it but when you’re flying in and out different countries every week then this is the sort of things that your staff do so you can focus on the job at hand. Do people actually think sports stars are browsing Skyscanner 😂😂 Yes, that was the case. The first anyone knew of Djokovic's positive test was when it was revealed in court papers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,512 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 17 minutes ago, The Dude said: Yes, that was the case. The first anyone knew of Djokovic's positive test was when it was revealed in court papers. and whats the relevance of him or anyone being refused a visa on the basis they had previously tested positive? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,287 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 I wonder what the sponsors think of their championship being devalued in this way? How can it have any credibility without the guy who has won the last 3? Perhaps it would suit the Aussie government to let him begin playing but have his preparation so disrupted that he will soon lose and solve the problem? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 8 minutes ago, Bad Robot said: and whats the relevance of him or anyone being refused a visa on the basis they had previously tested positive? Because that would later become the reason Djokovic sought an exemption. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooperson 872 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 3 minutes ago, Thermopylae said: I wonder what the sponsors think of their championship being devalued in this way? How can it have any credibility without the guy who has won the last 3? Perhaps it would suit the Aussie government to let him begin playing but have his preparation so disrupted that he will soon lose and solve the problem? The sponsors don't have a lot of lee way at this moment in time. After everything Melbourne has been through, especially the last few years the general public don't give a fuck about him and if he gets in they will go ape shit because he gets special treatment. They have been shat on by that tit Dan Andrews their premier and they are over lockdown,their could be serious shit happening if this is not handled right Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,512 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 56 minutes ago, The Dude said: Because that would later become the reason Djokovic sought an exemption. but the fact it’s part of the visa exemption is irrelevant as he was beyond the 14 days. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 9 minutes ago, Bad Robot said: but the fact it’s part of the visa exemption is irrelevant as he was beyond the 14 days. Except his team argued that it should have counted as the reason he was exempt from Australia's entry requirements. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,512 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 2 minutes ago, The Dude said: Except his team argued that it should have counted as the reason he was exempt from Australia's entry requirements. and that was accepted by the judge Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 Just now, Bad Robot said: and that was accepted by the judge The judge ruled based on procedural errors rather than Djokovic's argument. In fact, Djokovic's own team argued a 'typo' (or human error) should have made the Notice of Intention to Consider Cancellation 'defective', Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inigo 32,686 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 Love watching him as a competitor. Just a beast on the tennis court. Always good to see an arrogant prick being brought down a peg or two, though. Would clearly do pretty much anything to win. And he wonders why he's not as popular as others. Quite obviously a deserved result given what's happened. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creampuff 22,628 Posted January 14, 2022 Author Share Posted January 14, 2022 29 minutes ago, Bad Robot said: and that was accepted by the judge This would be a great point if it weren’t completely inaccurate. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.