Safe Standing - Where Would You Have It?

[DutchBlueGuard 18]

Still not been convinced by the copland front vote.

Although a group of standing fans behind the goals may 'look nice' on the tv, anyone who has been to a european game will know that although that area will be bouncing it takes the atmosphere out of the rest of the stadium.

[govanblue 16,847]

Club Deck.

[simon 1,743]

Still not been convinced by the copland front vote.

Although a group of standing fans behind the goals may 'look nice' on the tv, anyone who has been to a european game will know that although that area will be bouncing it takes the atmosphere out of the rest of the stadium.

That's not true.

[onefootwillie 1,518]

Enclosures and Copland Front. If it goes well and there is the demand then Add the Govan front as well.

[DutchBlueGuard 18]

That's not true.

From my experience it does sir

[Creampuff 22,628]

Enclosures.

[Inigo 32,534]

From my experience it does sir

Not from mine either.

Works in Hamburg quite well.

[WilliamFyfe 1,438]

Would probably work best in the enclosures but I doubt folk sitting in those areas would want to give up those seats

I voted for Copland Front

[Wearethepeople72 1,845]

Copland front seems like the most logical place to have it.

[Wearethepeople72 1,845]

You flip back the seats you can stand, dont see why its needed.

Not when everyone around about you is sitting you can't.

[stuart1994 4,303]

Copland front. Either that or the Enclosures, never the broomlan.

[jimgers 565]

The Enclosure would seem the obvious choice, but it would be great to see the bears doing the bouncy etc on TV. But with the current positioning of the TV cameras in the gantry, we'll never see it on TV. So i have picked the Broomy Front, unless we transfer the camera's to the Sandy Jardine stand.

[Orange&Blue 130]

Enclosure first then Copland Front

[JAMC 12]

Enclosure for me. Miss those days big time.

[Turnberry18 3,204]

The three stands were built with intention of being all seater. If we were to have a standing area then it would obviously be the east and west enclosures.

[ally62 393]

Copland front, all ready stand for all the games....row AA

[GWR1979 1,964]

Has to be the Enclosures, The seats in there are tight as fuck anyway.

[Inigo 32,534]

The three stands were built with intention of being all seater. If we were to have a standing area then it would obviously be the east and west enclosures.

Safe standing could still be easily retro fitted though.

[Uncle Bertrum 9]

Some safe standing used to be provided on the pylons at Parkheid.

Maybe we should erect some pylons at each end of our stadium, and sell tickets to man these positions.

The best part about it would be that there are no restricted view areas.

[siddiqi_drinker 14,635]

said for years they should give the E/W enclosure back to the fans

[simon 1,743]

Not from mine either.

Works in Hamburg quite well.

Dortmund as well.

[black75 46]

Would be great to see the enclosures bouncing again, loads of happy memories going mental in the them over the years . Don't think the stadium has ever really been the same since they were seated .

[DutchBlueGuard 18]

Dortmund as well.

From experience i dont think it has worked in Italy or Brasil, the other ends of the stadium become barren.

Anyway I would hate to see ibrox standing section modeled on the 'Ultra' scenes across europe.

[bump 168]

both enclosures would be a good start and if its a winner then the lower halfs of the ground starting either ends behind the goals

[Corky True Legend 2,682]

Dortmund as well.

And in Hannover. The standing areas are just to the right of the goals (looking from the pitch) and diagonally opposite. Visitors are to the rear of the central walkway; not sure but I think the home section is front and rear. And NO SEGREGATION. Their polis can do their job.