bluenose_n1 536 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 57 minutes ago, BlueCafu1872 said: Think moh as a cam?...cause I like the idea with tav at rm always have ... then ofcourse you can have rossiter on for Halliday edit-don't think for a minute Harry is lazy mate he chases down everyball and he's played Lw a few times this season...quite well too Aye mate what I mean is he's 2 lazy to be a winger in the sense of up and down the park for 90 mins cant see him chasing someone back into his own box agree he works hard in midfield Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
theiconicman 3,027 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 18 minutes ago, graeme_4 said: Fod Tav Senderos Wilson Wallace Barton Windass Forrrester Waghorn Garner McKay Senderos is a shitebag....got himself sent off because he couldn't cope with being on the field. Barton is a mouth jockey and should be dropped. Waghorn and McKay are not wingers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billythebear77 10,386 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 I know he won't go 3-5-2 but, we need to shore up the back more, and with Tav and Waldo playing wing back and wee Rossiter in the cdm role. That leaves Harry and windass to support a front 2 off Waggy and garner. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenose_n1 536 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 1 hour ago, graeme_4 said: Fod Tav Senderos Wilson Wallace Barton Windass Forrrester Waghorn Garner McKay Rossiter for Barton and ohallaran for McKay have a look at this photo is that the kind of guy you want in a rangers jersey he plays far to deep and leaves us exposed in the middle of the park plus I've seen a milk turn quicker than him plus he runs like he's towing a fucking caravan ohallaran has played at in the top flight and played well I. The past and must get a run Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Three stripes 411 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 2 hours ago, In Dungeons Deep said: GK - Foderingam RB - Tavernier RCB - Senderos LCB - Wilson LB - Wallace CDM - Rossiter RAM - Windass LAM - Forrester RW - Waghorn LW - McKay ST - Garner That team is a cracker No Barton and Nico Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoGeo7 10,871 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 14 minutes ago, Billythebear77 said: I know he won't go 3-5-2 but, we need to shore up the back more, and with Tav and Waldo playing wing back and wee Rossiter in the cdm role. That leaves Harry and windass to support a front 2 off Waggy and garner. Quite like the concept but in reality 3 centre halves (ours anyway) would end up being like the 3 stooges Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoGeo7 10,871 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 8 minutes ago, bluenose_n1 said: Rossiter for Barton and ohallaran for McKay have a look at this photo is that the kind of guy you want in a rangers jersey he plays far to deep and leaves us exposed in the middle of the park plus I've seen a milk turn quicker than him plus he runs like he's towing a fucking caravan ohallaran has played at in the top flight and played well I. The past and must get a run Barton appears to have mellowed out too much, he needed to be a fierce bastard yesterday, reading the game and crunching them, just didn't see any of that. Wee rossiter looks the part in that he'd not give you the time on the ball that Barton did. Much like with McCoist in charge I'm wondering if the player has been instructed to do this by the manager or is choosing to do this themself. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenose_n1 536 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 2 minutes ago, NeoGeo7 said: Barton appears to have mellowed out too much, he needed to be a fierce bastard yesterday, reading the game and crunching them, just didn't see any of that. Wee rossiter looks the part in that he'd not give you the time on the ball that Barton did. Much like with McCoist in charge I'm wondering if the player has been instructed to do this by the manager or is choosing to do this themself. Well we will find out if the manager has the balls to do what is needed I heard Barton has a guaranteed start in old firm games wrote into his contract could be pish though Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billythebear77 10,386 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 4 minutes ago, NeoGeo7 said: Quite like the concept but in reality 3 centre halves (ours anyway) would end up being like the 3 stooges I know mate, but with the three stooges plus Tav and Waldo IMO we'd be a wee bit harder to score against, it's got to be our priority for the sheep game, if they beat us then I can't see the manager staying in a job. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoGeo7 10,871 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 4 minutes ago, bluenose_n1 said: Well we will find out if the manager has the balls to do what is needed I heard Barton has a guaranteed start in old firm games wrote into his contract could be pish though I'd fucking hate that as a manager to be forced to p;any certain players, totally restricts your ability to manage the team so I'd doubt it was true but then again we were all surprised Barton signed for us. Unless he starts playing with more bite soon we'll be wishing he hadn't. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gascoigne8 3,403 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 Chose a back 3 of wallace,wislon amd tav for no reason other than the rest are dog shit Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NixonRFC 1,476 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 I'm a bit bored with this one up top stuff to be honest, we aren't clinical enough to play with less than two strikers Foderingham Tavernier Hill Wilson Wallace Forrester Rossiter Windass Halliday Waghorn Garner Plenty of energy, guile and attacking options in that team Can even turn into a Diamond Rossiter Windass Halliday Forrester Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
falkirkNS 6,298 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 Foderingham Tavernier, Senderos, Wilson(more so after kiernans performance yesterday) Wallace Windass Rossiter/Holt Halliday O`Halloran Garner Forrester/Waghorn Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amac9 2,060 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 Foderingham Tavernier Senderos Wilson Wallace Windass Barton Forrester Waghorn Garner McKay Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Avenger 22,568 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 2 hours ago, Lloyd72 said: Wes Senderos Wilson Tavernier Rossiter Wallace Windass Forrester Waghorn MOH Garner Bang on the money with that. A very refreshing look about it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wearethepeople72 1,851 Posted September 11, 2016 Share Posted September 11, 2016 Quote Foderingham Tavernier Senderos Wilson Wallace Barton Holt Windass Forrester Garner McKay Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMB 14,167 Posted September 12, 2016 Share Posted September 12, 2016 2 hours ago, Gascoigne8 said: Chose a back 3 of wallace,wislon amd tav for no reason other than the rest are dog shit That defense tho Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMB 14,167 Posted September 12, 2016 Share Posted September 12, 2016 3-5-2. More protection at the back. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carluke RSC 2 Posted September 12, 2016 Share Posted September 12, 2016 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
frazer89 93 Posted September 12, 2016 Share Posted September 12, 2016 We can sit here all day saying this and that about who should start, but we all know Warburton will probably pick the same team or the majority of players from that team again. Which if it wasn't Rangers would laughable. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackrfc95 4,255 Posted September 12, 2016 Share Posted September 12, 2016 Foderingham Tavernier Senderos Wilson Wallace Rossiter Halliday Windass Waghorn Garner McKay Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
B1872 21,449 Posted September 12, 2016 Share Posted September 12, 2016 Wes Tav Senderos Wilson Wallace Rossiter Crooks Waghorn Windass Forrester Garner Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The No.9 762 Posted September 12, 2016 Share Posted September 12, 2016 1 hour ago, B1872 said: Wes Tav Senderos Wilson Wallace Rossiter Crooks Waghorn Windass Forrester Garner That line up and formation would be fantastic I wish mark would just not be stubborn and realise passing football can be played in different formations and that the players he has aren't suiting the current 433 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.