wullyRFC 5,230 Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 Morelos wouldnt have caught the ball for the pen yellow was fine but Kane volleying Bates whether it was hard or soft or whatever it's a red card all day. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,540 Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 1 minute ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said: Sad that rather than condemn a player for kicking one of our players your default is to look to criticise our player for his part. Pretty damning on you. Aw fuck up mate. I've said he kicked him, it doesn't change the fact that Bates went down like he'd been shot. "Pretty damning" Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,540 Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 4 minutes ago, Courtyard Bear said: He got booted on the back of the knee when he isn’t expecting it coming, of course he is going to go down. Answer this, do you believe it was a straight red???? Imo it was handbags and, if the roles were reversed, I'd have been disappointed to see our player sent off for it. He could easily have been sent off for it though but to claim corruption just because he wasn't is laughable. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 54,119 Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 2 minutes ago, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said: How would them losing a striker affect how many goals we score at the other end? Pure speculation and clutching at straws imo. So now us playing against 10 men isn't likelier to see us dominate a game and probably score more? Wonder why teams don't just start with 10 men if it has no impact...... I take it that applies to us getting a penalty too for the Bates one? That wouldn't likely have added to our tally? Clutching at straws and pure speculation? ??? That you are even arguing that point shows how stupid you and your argument are coming across. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 54,119 Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 Just now, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said: Imo it was handbags and, if the roles were reversed, I'd have been disappointed to see our player sent off for it. He could easily have been sent off for it though but to claim corruption just because he wasn't is laughable. Was there intent to kick a player off the ball? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
To Be A Ranger 4,032 Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 They'd be cheating themselves out of a career in any other country. Sheer incompetence is being too nice to them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,540 Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 3 minutes ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said: So now us playing against 10 men isn't likelier to see us dominate a game and probably score more? Wonder why teams don't just start with 10 men if it has no impact...... I take it that applies to us getting a penalty too for the Bates one? That wouldn't likely have added to our tally? Clutching at straws and pure speculation? ??? That you are even arguing that point shows how stupid you and your argument are coming across. Never heard the phrase sometimes it's harder to play against 10 men then? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 54,119 Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 4 minutes ago, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said: Aw fuck up mate. I've said he kicked him, it doesn't change the fact that Bates went down like he'd been shot. "Pretty damning" You want to add up the times you've criticised both Bates and their player on this thread? See where your focus for criticism lies? As I say, pretty damning that your default is to have a go at a Rangers player sooner and more frequently than the guy that booted him. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,540 Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 Just now, Sportingintegritymyarse said: You want to add up the times you've criticised both Bates and their player on this thread? See where your focus for criticism lies? As I say, pretty damning that your default is to have a go at a Rangers player sooner and more frequently than the guy that booted him. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 54,119 Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 2 minutes ago, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said: Never heard the phase sometimes it's harder to play against 10 men then? Yeah hear that from time to time. Do you believe that teams reduced to 10 men win or lose more? Does it affect their style of play? Or is that just more speculation? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 54,119 Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 1 minute ago, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said: ?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,540 Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 Just now, Sportingintegritymyarse said: Yeah hear that from time to time. Do you believe that teams reduced to 10 men win or lose more? Does it affect their style of play? Or is that just more speculation? They tend to shut up shop. Which would make it harder for us to score goals and increase our tally which you seem to think was a given if they went down to 10 men. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 54,119 Posted February 27, 2018 Share Posted February 27, 2018 3 minutes ago, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said: They tend to shut up shop. Which would make it harder for us to score goals and increase our tally which you seem to think was a given if they went down to 10 men. So is it to their advantage to go to 10 men to then shut up shop and deny us more goals? They must be raging then they never got a man sent off. Heard it all from you now in your campaign to deny any chance we're being deliberately screwed by refs. Slate the Rangers player, don't slate the guy who kicked him, and deny any advantage to a team from getting a penalty or an opposition player sent off. Superb mate. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPWF 8,392 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 1 hour ago, Domthenbud said: How the fuck does he sound like a tarrier. He has an opinion and is entitled to express it. The player deliberately kicked our player. The ref saw it and gave a yellow card. A deliberate kick on an opponent is a red card. The ref was wrong and in my eyes he cheated Rangers. What fucking right do you have to call a fellow Rangers fan a tarrier. Oh I forgot it’s your opinion. Well your opinion is shite. 1 hour ago, Blue Avenger said: FFS, he saw the incident head on. So if similar happens against the scum and it resulted in them turning us over, you'll br crying it's just incopetence? Aye right! Mind in the 90’s the mhanks used to talk how it was a proddy conspiracy? and we used to laugh at them and call them paranoid? Well I’m sitting here laughing at you two paranoid messes. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPWF 8,392 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 1 hour ago, Bristoe1872 said: Utter shite. Ignoring the rules is not incompetency ...it's cheating. Daring to point out that kicking a player off the ball is a straight red card and not a yellow is not tarrier like. No wonder we get this crap frequently when some fans have the opinion you have. Claiming the ref is cheating and not just incompetent is what they did in the 90’s. There is no refs conspiracy against Rangers, they’re just bad at their jobs. Can’t belive I’m having to say this to grown adults. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOAT 30,449 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 Haven’t seen any highlights of it and never seen the incident. But if he’s kicked Bates and no matter how hard or soft or no matter how much Bates went down like he’d been shot as someone said, it’s still violent conduct, it is still a red card. its poor refereeing, that being said it’s not corrupt ffs, it’s just shite refereeing. Save that shite for the tarriers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Avenger 22,567 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 1 hour ago, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said: Aw fuck up mate. I've said he kicked him, it doesn't change the fact that Bates went down like he'd been shot. "Pretty damning" A bit like the talentless one again in the first five and pretty much every game. Thing is Windass wasn't even fouled. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Avenger 22,567 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 1 hour ago, Courtyard Bear said: Made a meal of it. ???? When you start posting that shit you should just admit your beat and go to bed. FFS, he'd be in a life long coma. Gee the poor fella a break. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davy Vandenbroucke 26,354 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 16 minutes ago, Blue Avenger said: A bit like the talentless one again in the first five and pretty much every game. Thing is Windass wasn't even fouled. Aye, cause the big mark in the side of his head just magically appeared from nothing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPWF 8,392 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 7 minutes ago, Bronzy said: Aye, cause the big mark in the side of his head just magically appeared from nothing. That’s his hair. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davy Vandenbroucke 26,354 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 Just now, Sasa Papac's War Flashbac. said: That’s his hair. I meant the red lump and the white stuff. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPWF 8,392 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 Just now, Bronzy said: I meant the red lump and the white stuff. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davy Vandenbroucke 26,354 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 3 minutes ago, Sasa Papac's War Flashbac. said: I suspected as much tbh Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS4_wul 4,132 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 7 hours ago, Laudrupsleftfoot said: It's embarrassing when the cheating/corruption cries are made. Particularly when it's coupled with a selective memory i.e. the Goss free kick as someone else pointed out. Refs give free kicks the wrong way all the time. It's down to how he sees it. Fans argue about every decision.....was/wasn't a corner, free kick, offside etc. He quite clearly sees the cunt kick Bates then gives a yellow........violent conduct is supposed to be a straight red mate. Not suggesting ref cheated, just bemused by the yellow for a deliberate kick at an apponent. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,779 Posted February 28, 2018 Author Share Posted February 28, 2018 6 hours ago, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said: You think that tonight was a game changing decision? Think of this then, st johnstone play 3 relegation candidates next few games, that boy kane scores the winner in every game, games he should have been banned for, is that right? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.