BargeddieBear 0 Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 I noticed in the transfers section not many are impressed by Luke Moore, including me. So i was wondering who would you prefer, Moore, who we'd have to shell out 3.5Mil for, or Nacho whos already there of course. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 i think Moore wud surprise some people up here but thats just me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nvager 498 Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 I know what I am getting with Nacho - I know nothing of Moore except a long term injury and not many goals. Not too big either? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baileyseye 0 Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 Can't say i have seen much of Moore so it's got to be Nacho. If he is not getting a game for AV why on earth could he be worth 3.5M. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
excoriate 0 Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 Nacho. The SPL is sadly, not about technique, but about workrate and desire (mostly). Nacho, unless they can find someone much, much better than Moore for 3.5m. To be fair to Walt, once he found out O'Neil ripping the pish about Moore's fee, he's not been back Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davy 68 Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 I, and I'd assume a shit load of others, haven't seen enough of Moore to judge him. However, some are already claiming hes not good enough... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
excoriate 0 Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 However, some are already claiming hes not good enough... inc. Walter! Good enough for free, but not for a fee Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlie78 0 Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 has to be novo everytime plus he won't cost 3.5mil plus and won't cost us about 25/30 a week on wages oh and i forgot novo loves this club and does'nt want to be anywhere else so an easy question i think. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CooperSF 5,792 Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 There's only 1 Nacho Novo.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 he said no the provo's Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted E Bayer 484 Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 Difficult to say. We know Nacho's like a true Bear. We have no idea what Moore will be like. On footballing ability alone Moore.. Moore controls the ball with his feet. Nacho controls the ball with his shins. For that reason Moore for me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
J_RFC87 761 Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 nacho Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazza 21 Posted January 23, 2008 Share Posted January 23, 2008 I have seen little to nothing of Moore so can't make a judgement. I must admit I liked the way we used Novo in the early part of the season where we sent him on with 20 mins to go and told him to blow them away. It worked well to and got us goals. I wonder why we moved away from that? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted January 23, 2008 Share Posted January 23, 2008 Seen Luke Moore play a few times before, only 3 times this season tho. In the games I have seen him play this season he's looked no better than Filip Sebo. Based on the 3 times I'd have to go with Nacho. Maybe Moore is better once he's getting a regular game and is up to match fitness/sharpness? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfc_no1fan 13 Posted January 23, 2008 Share Posted January 23, 2008 So we are comparing Nacho Novo (Who cant get a game for Rangers and when he does he gets stuck out wide cause he cant score goals) with Luke Moore (a 22 year old, who only lost his place in the Villa team due to a dislocated shoulder, but is now finding it hard to get back into the team as Villa have Carew and Agbonlahor upfront) Nacho Novo has already peaked and its not great. Luke Moore can improve and has his best years ahead of him. Its not a gamble with Moore as we are getting him at the right time. Luke Moore for me every time, if its between him and Novo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
likeacare 9 Posted January 23, 2008 Share Posted January 23, 2008 I voted Novo. He has more experience. Moore is a good prospect for the future though. I hope we get him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaffbear 4,096 Posted January 23, 2008 Share Posted January 23, 2008 i like Nacho but he's a headless chicken and great for the last 20-30 minutes of a game. Luke Moore is young and willing to progress his career and has ability so for me Luke Moore with nacho on the bench. Got family who are Villa fans and they say Moore was the next big thing but O'Neill not really given him a run in the team. wattie likes him and when was the last time he let us down with a signing... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garfield 47 Posted January 23, 2008 Share Posted January 23, 2008 Theres only one Nacho Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
docspiderman 1,234 Posted January 23, 2008 Share Posted January 23, 2008 Has to be Nacho, scores in the spl , in Europe, saves us when we are struggling, tracks back,tackles, helps midfield, bails out our full backs and SCORES AGAINST CELTIC. I admit I have seen little of Moore and from what I have seen he has pace but little else other than what seems to be a very poor attitude and no willingness to work for his team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Stars Bearette 1 Posted January 23, 2008 Share Posted January 23, 2008 Nacho until Moore proves himself...though Moore was a first team player before his injury and was scoring regularly in the Premiership and could do a job up here Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigeee 60 Posted January 23, 2008 Share Posted January 23, 2008 I'd prefer to see Moore , he's only 21... If he settles in well and plays like he was for villa before the injury then 3.5m is a fair price for someone we will get a lot of years from. Nacho is great as a back up player but I would never see him as a first team regular. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperRangers 2 Posted January 23, 2008 Share Posted January 23, 2008 nacho novo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts