Is the old firm game coming to early?

[plumbGER 24,518]

35 minutes ago, TheLoudenTavernier said:

You said they were playing shite just now as well. I felt that part was delusional given the amount of goals they're scoring.

Do I think we can beat them with Waghorn back and if Garner hits the ground running? Absolutely.

You didn't state which part of my OP was delusional?

In my OP i said bring them on any day of the week, i see no reason to fear them.

What's delusional about that?

Btw i never once said they were "shite"

I said we haven't been great and neither have they.

Stop getting a hardon over a few results for them fs.

 

[LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,510]

13 minutes ago, plumbGER said:

You didn't state which part of my OP was delusional?

In my OP i said bring them on any day of the week, i see no reason to fear them.

What's delusional about that?

Btw i never once said they were "shite"

I said we haven't been great and neither have they.

Stop getting a hardon over a few results for them fs.

 

Not "getting a hardon" over any of their results. They're currently playing better football and are far more clinical in front of goal than us. I said unless we improve drastically then the game has come too early for us. I've said that Garner and a fit Waghorn may be the solution to that.

I don't see how this is difficult for you to process. It's a difference of opinion, it generally happens on a forum. Move on and stop quoting me now, thanks.

[plumbGER 24,518]

7 minutes ago, TheLoudenTavernier said:

Not "getting a hardon" over any of their results. They're currently playing better football and are far more clinical in front of goal than us. I said unless we improve drastically then the game has come too early for us. I've said that Garner and a fit Waghorn may be the solution to that.

I don't see how this is difficult for you to process. It's a difference of opinion, it generally happens on a forum. Move on and stop quoting me now, thanks.

Fuck up and stop mis-quoting me then ya muppet.

You still haven't told me what was 'delusional'??

 

[LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,510]

3 minutes ago, plumbGER said:

Fuck up and stop mis-quoting me then ya muppet.

You still haven't told me what was 'delusional'??

 

You said they weren't playing great either. I've already explained that I felt that was delusional due to the amount of goals they've been scoring. This is the 2nd time I've explained it now, hopefully it'll sink in. If you do require a 3rd one though I can write it on a piece of paper in crayon and draw a diagram along with it and upload the picture to this thread for you?

[cr3_bear 14,862]

Thinking about If i went into a game v them under fucking clipboard kenny with the slightest glimmer of hope then I more than fancy our chances and feel much more confident of us against them under warburton at parkhead 

[philiprfc 1,799]

Form doesn't mean a lot in OF games. We weren't playing well at all going into the semi and we got a deserved win. Granted they aren't the same team, but we have strengthened too. We have our problems but I have confidence that we can iron out these issues before the 10th.

[plumbGER 24,518]

26 minutes ago, TheLoudenTavernier said:

You said they weren't playing great either. I've already explained that I felt that was delusional due to the amount of goals they've been scoring. This is the 2nd time I've explained it now, hopefully it'll sink in. If you do require a 3rd one though I can write it on a piece of paper in crayon and draw a diagram along with it and upload the picture to this thread for you?

Fuck up ya spastic, you quoted me as saying they were playing "shite" 

Which is a lot different from "not great".

Do you want the difference wrote down in crayons and uploaded?

Do yourself a favour and establish some facts before trying to shoot down my,or anyone elses posts.

 

[LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,510]

1 minute ago, plumbGER said:

Fuck up ya spastic, you quoted me as saying they were playing "shite" 

Which is a lot different from "not great".

Do you want the difference wrote down in crayons and uploaded?

Do yourself a favour and establish some facts before trying to shoot down my,or anyone elses posts.

 

And I've since corrected that and still said that to say they've been "not great" is a bit delusional given the amount of goals they've been scoring. This is getting a bit repetitive now.

And since your only replies are now either abuse or repeating the same shit I've said to you already, I'll assume you don't have the brain cells to construct a proper argument and leave you to it.

Cheerio now x

[Smile 26,610]

No as it will be more open as the filth support will demand they push forward and if we play with the same pacey play we had last season we will be Victorious.

Send us Victorious happy and Glorious.

[Smile 26,610]

35 minutes ago, TheLoudenTavernier said:

You said they weren't playing great either. I've already explained that I felt that was delusional due to the amount of goals they've been scoring. This is the 2nd time I've explained it now, hopefully it'll sink in. If you do require a 3rd one though I can write it on a piece of paper in crayon and draw a diagram along with it and upload the picture to this thread for you?

 

[LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,510]

1 minute ago, Smile said:

Geez peace

[plumbGER 24,518]

1 minute ago, TheLoudenTavernier said:

And I've since corrected that and still said that to say they've been "not great" is a bit delusional given the amount of goals they've been scoring. This is getting a bit repetitive now.

And since your only replies are now either abuse or repeating the same shit I've said to you already, I'll assume you don't have the brain cells to construct a proper argument and leave you to it.

Cheerio now x

So you admit to fucking up your argument but i am the one without the brain cells to construct a proper argument?

You're a funny guy.

[LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,510]

1 minute ago, plumbGER said:

So you admit to fucking up your argument but i am the one without the brain cells to construct a proper argument?

You're a funny guy.

Wow

[delamonty 992]

Until our defence is sorted... I worry.  That said, I expect nothing less than 110% from our lads.  Losing to that mob is unthinkable.

On the day, we'll be ready.  Our midfield will be too good, too strong -- and will provide protection as well for our back 4.  We need to work as hard as we ever had here.  I expect a couple of epic performances.  Joey for one.  Needs to show Brown up and shut him up as well.  Also expect wee Barry to play a blinder and of course King Kenny to score. Big Wes to also have a standout performance on the day.

Nervous -- but quietly confident.  Old Firm matches are not about present form.  Won on emotion and taking chances.

WATP and GSTQ  

[plumbGER 24,518]

4 minutes ago, TheLoudenTavernier said:

Wow

?

[Bad Robot 21,150]

2 hours ago, TheLoudenTavernier said:

You said they were playing shite just now as well. I felt that part was delusional given the amount of goals they're scoring.

Do I think we can beat them with Waghorn back and if Garner hits the ground running? Absolutely.

Without a doubt, we'll play our normal possesion game and Joe, if he starts will score. Our defence also know from the semi that there will be sustained attacks but that's time they will need to play it out. We've a good chance of staying top and maintaining this until 55. 

[glasgow argyle 1,093]

7 hours ago, In Dungeons Deep said:

Yes, but only by a game or two.

far far too early I.M.O.

with a hangover i will struggle to get out of bed before kick off.

start the game at 3pm, oh forgot septic fans got that stopped

[LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,510]

24 minutes ago, Bad Robot said:

Without a doubt, we'll play our normal possesion game and Joe, if he starts will score. Our defence also know from the semi that there will be sustained attacks but that's time they will need to play it out. We've a good chance of staying top and maintaining this until 55. 

I'd be surprised and disappointed if he didn't start. I'd hope that Senderos starts too if he signs as I don't doubt that our defence would be a lot stronger with him in it rather than Kiernan and Wilson/Hill.

We'll go into this as the big underdogs but we played them off the park at Hampden with a weaker starting 11 than the one that will start this game. The players should remember that and take confidence from it.

Being honest I would bite your hand off for a draw but if we go there and turn them over again it will be a huge result for us even at this early stage of the season.

[bombaybadboy08 15,660]

This is now a Sashbash thread.

 

[bombaybadboy08 15,660]

 

[Bad Robot 21,150]

1 hour ago, TheLoudenTavernier said:

I'd be surprised and disappointed if he didn't start. I'd hope that Senderos starts too if he signs as I don't doubt that our defence would be a lot stronger with him in it rather than Kiernan and Wilson/Hill.

We'll go into this as the big underdogs but we played them off the park at Hampden with a weaker starting 11 than the one that will start this game. The players should remember that and take confidence from it.

Being honest I would bite your hand off for a draw but if we go there and turn them over again it will be a huge result for us even at this early stage of the season.

We need the first goal as they would thrive on it and we know how obsessive they are over their number one club (us) and although we have enough in our locker to recover I want us directing the game and not them. I don't see senderos starting as he was sent back with full knowledge he's was no 5 on a list of only 4 but MW was honest with him in regards to our situation so let's hope he's back at MP training; plus the defence isn't normally a position to take a risk if there's an established partnership whose 'been and done it' albeit we knew they need to click on the day. 

Joe must start or get 30 mins on Friday then another run out on the 3rd.  I know video compilations can be deceiving but if this guy does what he can, I think he's going to be a star due to his natural improvisation, his heading and his pen taking albeit I don't know if he has pace. If Niko places balls for him then it could be pretty magical.

We need to put them back in their place especially at the piggery as they've had it too easy, too long.

We welcome the chase ??

[theiconicman 2,991]

21 hours ago, Ryju84 said:

Not coming too early.

So far we have had to play games where opposite teams close us down and constantly put us under challenges. Its been tough.

Sellic have played teams that stand off them (Motherwell for fuck sake gave them 10 yards of space on several occasions, and let the Tims dance with the ball... yes, I watched 15 minutes of their game and established that).

 

Cant wait until the Old Firm because it will be the first real challenge they face this season. We will keep a high tempo. And Kranjcar will write his name into Rangers history books with his dominance IMO.

It's interesting because I see similarities between Celtic this season and us last season. Teams haven't adapyed to Brenda's copy of us. 

They will. 

[G.E.C. 18,777]

15 hours ago, Gaz52 said:

I never thought I'd see the day when Rangers fans are quivering at the thought of playing Celtic

I was dreading the 2-0 game when McDowell was in charge.

Completely different circumstances mind.

[cr3_bear 14,862]

24 minutes ago, G.E.C. said:

I was dreading the 2-0 game when McDowell was in charge.

Completely different circumstances mind.

Same , as much as I was dreading it i still couldn't help but have that glimmer of hope that it might be our day depsite the fact we were utter pish at the time  ,

the game will take care of itself on the day 

[WGOH 2,344]

See if we can get a at least a point there and stay top of the league having already played at Torbett Towers, then anything more than a point is a major bonus.