K.A.I 36,183 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 7 minutes ago, Courtyard Bear said: Is the taig compliance cunt looking at the dirty bastard who went over the ball on Jack?? The article I read this morning said so - it's one thing looking at it, though ... another thing doing something about it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 Just now, K.A.I said: The article I read this morning said so - it's one thing looking at it, though ... another thing doing something about it. I await to be surprised. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,725 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 Mental that folk can get worse punishment for gestures, celebrating goals, dissent than we've seen folk getting for leg break or rugby tackles. Or elbows etc that can do damage. Suppose it's a reflection of society where you can break someone's nose but don't sing a naughty song or you're fucked. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRITNEY IS NOT FEELING IT 8,293 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 Saying on SSN that he could have a case to answer to ,for alleged hand gesture to home fans , corrupt as fuck up here Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,647 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 Kick someone in the head sweep sweep make a hand gesture offered 1 match ban Just paranoid but Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElBufalo20 7,892 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 6 minutes ago, KingKirk said: Kick someone in the head sweep sweep make a hand gesture offered 1 match ban Just paranoid but Well yeah cos he hasn't actually Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
giffnockger 4,840 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 Cunts saying he shouldn't start on Saturday, who do we have any better in that position lol! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eskbankloyal 19,446 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 https://twitter.com/stvsport/status/909790582003904512 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,647 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 Just paranoid right enough @Bluepeter9was right about us lads Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cushynumber 25,178 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cushynumber 25,178 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,150 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 Professional footballers or managers shouldn't be getting dragged into exchanges or verbals with fans. The action of TLB could have incited crowd trouble and was wrong as was JW giving a fan the wanker sign. Should both be punished, yes probably IMO. The lego muncher not getting called is just favouritism IMO and is a lack of sporting integrity by the compliance officer who isn't fit for purpose Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tannobear 2 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 STV reporting that he has not been reported and is available for the old firm game Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMB 14,167 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 58 minutes ago, magic8ball said: this is how amateur and open to abuse this system is . The compliance officer only looks at things that get highlighted by media .as apparently he doesn't have time to watch all the games when this position was first brought in a few years back I watched Hooper blatantly elbow a Motherwell player off the ball.1 replay .no half time or full time inquest by the panel.no action from compliance officer 2 weeks later naismith does almost the exact same thing.media all over it and he was tried by the media by the Sunday morning .Monday morning he's offered a 2 match ban I think the Conpliance Officer looks at anything that is sent to him. You or I could send him footage and he would be compelled to look at it. Someone raised the point in SSB and that's the information that was said although it was a few years ago now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
orangecountry 148 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 Personally I've no problem with what windas done. The guy was being a wank not returning the ball. And got called out for it. We've left ourselves in a glass house with this one though after the club1872's statement about lemon we can pretty much expect to get hammered for this type of shit. It's the mass hysteria about a pathetic gesture and mock outrage that turns them into real problems. Remember reading in the paper a while back about a (Ice hockey) Manchester player punching a fife supporter because he threw a pint over him. Of course the player got a 5 min penalty for the attack during the game and a 3 match ban after it was reviewed but the reaction from BOTH sets of fans were basically "idiot shouldn't have flung a pint over him, what did he expect" obviously a ban in that case was the right thing to do but if that was football it would be front pages and police phoned n folk would be wanted in jail for it. yet in football people get oh so fucking offended over a player reacting back to fans being arseholes? A fuckin' ban for calling a spade a spade? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenerife Bear 1,748 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 Oh well. It's clearly ok now for players and managers to tell fans they are wankers, to stick middle fingers up and to get it right fucking up them. A very dangerous precedent. Can't imagine it will be long before some crazy bastard takes to the field and actually properly attacks one of them, rather than just drunk miskicks or poofy slaps. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clemdog 39,389 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 Get the whole team calling them wankers on Saturday. Thats the least we deserve. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turnberry18 3,204 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 5 minutes ago, Tenerife Bear said: Oh well. It's clearly ok now for players and managers to tell fans they are wankers, to stick middle fingers up and to get it right fucking up them. A very dangerous precedent. Can't imagine it will be long before some crazy bastard takes to the field and actually properly attacks one of them, rather than just drunk miskicks or poofy slaps. Maybe it is something the club will deal with internally. I would rather Windass focused more on the park, especially after that performance the other night. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 31 minutes ago, KingKirk said: Just paranoid right enough @Bluepeter9was right about us lads 'We' are so paranoid we are manning the pitchforks on a non- story!! Ffs!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 Facebook eh? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenoz 30,842 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 1 hour ago, eejay the dj said: Hope he out of the OF to be honest .We might even have 11 men on the pitch That's not the point. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cushynumber 25,178 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 I think we need to incorporate the "windass wank" into a song to be sung at the Partick support Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
K.A.I 36,183 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 Just now, Bluepeter9 said: 'We' are so paranoid we are manning the pitchforks on a non- story!! Ffs!!! On this instance you are totally correct. It was a Daily Record "exclusive" this morning Wonder who got the scoop, Keith? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 Just now, K.A.I said: On this instance you are totally correct. It was a Daily Record "exclusive" this morning Wonder who got the scoop, Keith? Didn't stop folk reacting to it tho' if it's in the record or sun it just needs ignored! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
K.A.I 36,183 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 Just now, Bluepeter9 said: Didn't stop folk reacting to it tho' if it's in the record or sun it just needs ignored! To be fair they do get it right sometimes - as scummy as they are Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.