SeparateEntityMyArse 53,724 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 14 minutes ago, sonofbear said: The same Obrian who owns 2.82 % of the bheasts ?? (I don't know) Is he a scum director or shareholder is my query? D'arts tweet suggests Director but I've not seen that elsewhere. Or else it refers to Desmond who doesn't own INM as he isn't majority shareholder. I don't know either, but think the twatter could be mistaking share holding for directorship. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
backup 4,724 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 30 minutes ago, TMB said: It's not "fluff". Dave King is publicly bringing in to question to impartiality of the SFA which has no doubt damaged the reputation and integrity of that organisation. The SFA have just launched this 'revised Notice of Complaint relating to the monitoring period subsequent to the grant of the UEFA licence' which means they're still targeting this football club and may continue to do so in to the future. That needs to stop. Rangers, rather than constantly sit back on the defensive, must go on the attack and as far as I'm concerned they've done that. Rangers must paint the picture of a governing body, who is neither objective or impartial, out to get one of its member clubs due to the personal prejudices of its board members. It's fighting dirty in the court of public opinion but why not take this approach? Haven't others been damaging the reputation and integrity of the football club in full view of the public for years now? If shit slinging is the game then I'm all for the club getting its hands dirty. Until when and if he does anything about his serial statements they are fluff pieces, talk is cheap which of course is right up dave's street. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 53 minutes ago, TMB said: A guy currently on the board of the SFA referred to Rangers fans as "the great unwashed". I think Dave is right to question the impartiality of the governing body especially when a few of them have obvious leanings towards celtic. It's a cabal of corrupt cunts with leanings towards the Scum.It's a lock in too as the voting system they have ,means it can't be broken up Can't remember where I seen this but it was very damning Just maybe I could be right about other things regarding GCC as well The whole City is one fucked up little cesspit of nepotism and corruption And the don't even hide it now Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 2 hours ago, Robmc1 said: I’d like to think so but it’s probably unlikely, helping Rangers manuevre in to a position of strength diminishes their own chance of any success, be that cup or league position. They know that either side of the old firm will always dominate and our current issues keep it in their interest to keep thinks difficult for us even at the expense of no credible challenge to celtic. Sad state of affairs... Fair point there Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 2 hours ago, big blue Fin said: So king has made a statement with regard to the dodgy dealings in Scottish football. Part of me can't help thinking pot/kettle and another part thinking it'll do as much good as farting in a thunderstorm. Scottish football is corrupt, the taigs have coloured it green and white and cut it to suit their needs and no one elses. Their is as much chance of their being an I dependent investigation as there is of the Lego muncher being sent off next season as often as Ryan Jack was this last season. However it may be a good sign, perhaps dodgy dave is starting to come to terms to the fact that we are Rangers and no one likes us. 100%spot on Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
murzo 7,446 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 If king is wrong in what he is saying is he then not bringing the game into disrepute and the SPFL should summon him to answer for his comments. Or are they more interested in sweep,sweep. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonofbear 398 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 1 hour ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said: Is he a scum director or shareholder is my query? D'arts tweet suggests Director but I've not seen that elsewhere. Or else it refers to Desmond who doesn't own INM as he isn't majority shareholder. I don't know either, but think the twatter could be mistaking share holding for directorship. From the little I've seen he's a shareholder. Fritzl and Obrien. Majority shareholder plus minority Beast shareholder at Beast FC Obrien and Fritzl.45% shareholding between them at INM (plus the SPFL placeman MacLennan as a non Exec). Add MacLennans Rangers hating past and its clear to see he's definitely not of an independent persuasion whether he and his cabal be board members, non execs or shareholders. The legal aspects (of which I know nothing) may look on this differently in which case DK is probably merely rattling a few cages letting them know we are aware of what their up to and making it public so good on him. Get them outed Dave at the very least it may well unite the fans for once. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvern 11,329 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 24 minutes ago, eejay the dj said: And the don't even hide it now Why spend time and effort hiding that which is in plain view and is not questioned? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMB 14,167 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 44 minutes ago, backup said: Until when and if he does anything about his serial statements they are fluff pieces, talk is cheap which of course is right up dave's street. Dave King has asked for SFA board member Gavin Hughes to be removed. The SFA have now "launched a probe" and are investigating the board member for comments he made 12 years ago. Removal of a Rangers hater from the board of the SFA would be a victory. Over and above that, Rangers have now called in to question the impartiality of other SFA board members and the organisation itself. I imagine this will gather momentum over the coming weeks. You seem very unhappy about the whole thing. What more would you like to see happening? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMB 14,167 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 19 minutes ago, murzo said: If king is wrong in what he is saying is he then not bringing the game into disrepute and the SPFL should summon him to answer for his comments. Or are they more interested in sweep,sweep. I think a few of the guys at the SFA and SPFL will be fearful of their jobs right now and the last thing they'll want to do is go after Rangers having just been accused of biased. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,798 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 2 hours ago, Courtyard Bear said: The chip chip is a good way of starting this, it’s what the taigs did to start with. Little pointers put out there and before you know it everyone is starting to notice a pattern of what is going on. I hope you are right CB, always just a little uncertain of King's way of working. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,798 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 3 hours ago, Courtyard Bear said: The chip chip is a good way of starting this, it’s what the taigs did to start with. Little pointers put out there and before you know it everyone is starting to notice a pattern of what is going on. DP. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magic8ball 27,901 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 4 minutes ago, TMB said: I think a few of the guys at the SFA and SPFL will be fearful of their jobs right now and the last thing they'll want to do is go after Rangers having just been accused of biased. don't think they give a fuck how dare we question their impartially Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
murzo 7,446 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 4 minutes ago, TMB said: I think a few of the guys at the SFA and SPFL will be fearful of their jobs right now and the last thing they'll want to do is go after Rangers having just been accused of biased. That’s what I’m getting at. If they’ve nothing to hid they should be calling him out but we know they won’t because of what you’re saying above. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
backup 4,724 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 15 minutes ago, TMB said: Dave King has asked for SFA board member Gavin Hughes to be removed. The SFA have now "launched a probe" and are investigating the board member for comments he made 12 years ago. Removal of a Rangers hater from the board of the SFA would be a victory. Over and above that, Rangers have now called in to question the impartiality of other SFA board members and the organisation itself. I imagine this will gather momentum over the coming weeks. You seem very unhappy about the whole thing. What more would you like to see happening? If you equate stating simple fact as being unhappy, who am I to disabuse you of that notion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueKnight87 17,286 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 9 minutes ago, TMB said: I think a few of the guys at the SFA and SPFL will be fearful of their jobs right now and the last thing they'll want to do is go after Rangers having just been accused of biased. 3 minutes ago, murzo said: That’s what I’m getting at. If they’ve nothing to hid they should be calling him out but we know they won’t because of what you’re saying above. Spot on. SPFL haven't been shy in hitting us with charges before when it suits them. They didn't want this information regarding the chairman out in public and your right TMB there is likely a fear going after Rangers would lead to further accusations of bias. I really hope however that King is ready to take this as far as possible. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGovanIniesta 1,000 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 Conflict of interest is far too nice for my liking Call it what it is, blatant cheating/corruption from top to bottom all around Scotland Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magic8ball 27,901 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 can you imagine the outcry if we were in a similar position .having hand picked favourable friends in the top jobs . we wouldn't even get away with one .never mind the while shebang Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMB 14,167 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 56 minutes ago, backup said: If you equate stating simple fact as being unhappy, who am I to disabuse you of that notion. You stated - "Until when and if he does anything about his serial statements they are fluff pieces, talk is cheap which of course is right up dave's street". It's clear that you hate Dave King but there's no real substance to anything you've said beyond that. Where are these facts you speak of? Dave King has acted by releasing statements, the SFA have already begun an internal investigation in to one of their members, at least one could be canned and I'm certain more will come of this issue as time goes on. Dave King is backing Rangers against a bias SFA I'm happy he's done so Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 54 minutes ago, Bears r us said: I hope you are right CB, always just a little uncertain of King's way of working. Dave has decided that he is only interested in pleasing that cunt Courtyard Bear on RM. He will keep up the pressure. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,647 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 Looks as though the spfhell are just stonewalling it, what's the next move? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ritchieshearercaldow 22,137 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 2 minutes ago, BLUEDIGNITY said: Looks as though the spfhell are just stonewalling it, what's the next move? England, hopefully.......pigs might fly as well Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,798 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 21 minutes ago, Courtyard Bear said: Dave has decided that he is only interested in pleasing that cunt Courtyard Bear on RM. He will keep up the pressure. Now if you had just said that before I would never had any concerns. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Specky Forum Organiser 64,725 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 @backup is a million times worse than the most rabid filth supporter on the planet Cunt hates our chairman more than he cares about the club. Absolute embarrassment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hutton2008 646 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 2 hours ago, eejay the dj said: 100%spot on Overall I’m glad of his statement. Although I think his primary motive is to get fan backing the SPFL have been dodgy for years. Yes this the relationship between McLennan and Desmond has been public knowledge for months and King pretending otherwise is disingenuous - but that doesn’t make the relationship right. The more king puts pressure on the SPFL the more chance of impartiality. Although the directors within the league and and a couple of news papers were informed of the link the less observant fans on the ground did not and if the did there would have been outcry. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.