Retrospective action against this Brown Elbow?

[Inigo 32,528]

Looks pretty much like an elbow. Also don't think either Naismith's was red worthy. Both were yellows for me, which means nothing for the CO.

[magic8ball 27,901]

23 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

Think a few phone calls to their sports department are needed 

biased fucking cunts 

we don't have time to show all incidents will be the reply 

[Courtyard Bear 41,357]

1 minute ago, Inigo said:

Looks pretty much like an elbow. Also don't think either Naismith's was red worthy. Both were yellows for me, which means nothing for the CO.

Both were yellows which makes a red. 

[Inigo 32,528]

2 minutes ago, Courtyard Bear said:

Both were yellows which makes a red. 

The CO can't do that though. Unless I'm mistaken, he can only give retrospective straight reds.

[Basrah Bear 2,981]

looks quite clear to me that he tried to take him out deliberately with his elbow. Lets see how Liewells lemmings get him out of this one.

[Brubear 2,920]

1 hour ago, Laudrupsleftfoot said:

In two minds about this.

Yet again we're obsessing over that cunt Brown.

Brown is undoubtedly a dirty bastard but to give him his due he does take a lot of rough treatment with minimal complaint. But to call that an "alleged" elbow is a fucking joke and he should unquestionable be cited for it.

Media have to call it alleged until it is adjudicated on or they open themselves up to libel case. Same  goes for any court cases it doesn't mean they are being biased. 

[Courtyard Bear 41,357]

3 minutes ago, Inigo said:

The CO can't do that though. Unless I'm mistaken, he can only give retrospective straight reds.

Never mentioned the CO for Naishame. The fact he finished that game at all is a mystery, 2 blatant kicks at opposition players right in front of the Ref and he’s still on the pitch. 

[Inigo 32,528]

Just now, Courtyard Bear said:

Never mentioned the CO for Naishame. The fact he finished that game at all is a mystery, 2 blatant kicks at opposition players right in front of the Ref and he’s still on the pitch. 

Well no, but you replied to my post which was about the CO and each challenge taken individually (ergo whether they'd be CO relevant).

Couldn't care less if he should have been sent off or not. That's a separate discussion. 

[Courtyard Bear 41,357]

1 minute ago, Inigo said:

Well no, but you replied to my post which was about the CO and each challenge taken individually (ergo whether they'd be CO relevant).

Couldn't care less if he should have been sent off or not. That's a separate discussion. 

Well the CO could easily give a Red for his kick at Hayes. 

[Laudrupsleftfoot 10,874]

7 minutes ago, Brubear said:

Media have to call it alleged until it is adjudicated on or they open themselves up to libel case. 

Fair enough, didn't know that.

[Inigo 32,528]

Just now, Courtyard Bear said:

Well the CO could easily give a Red for his kick at Hayes. 

Don't see how tbh. Looks more of a push with the sole of his boot into his ass. It's a yellow card. Hardly any force behind it.

[Courtyard Bear 41,357]

1 minute ago, Inigo said:

Don't see how tbh. Looks more of a push with the sole of his boot into his ass. It's a yellow card. Hardly any force behind it.

?? ok then. 

[Inigo 32,528]

Cant see tge CO having the balls to give Lego a ban but not Naismith, even though that's more what the call should be from the pics.

[Inigo 32,528]

Just now, Courtyard Bear said:

?? ok then. 

You think there's force in that kick in the arse? 

[plumbGER 24,518]

3 minutes ago, Inigo said:

You think there's force in that kick in the arse? 

Is it not meant to be excessive force for a red anyway?

Looked pretty lame, more of a shove, than a stamp or kick.

[Inigo 32,528]

1 minute ago, plumbGER said:

Is it not meant to be excessive force for a red anyway?

Looked pretty lame, more of a shove, than a stamp or kick.

Yup.

[Mr Soprano 13,964]

6 hours ago, Colin Traive said:

Sent this to SFA:

“Hello,

I can find no link on the SFA website to communicate directly with the Compliance Officer so may I begin by asking that you please forward this message to him and confirm to me that this has been done?

Incidents are highlighted which the match officials may have missed and I would ask that one such incident be reviewed for potential retrospective action.

In the Hearts v celtic game on Saturday there was a deliberate elbow in the face of Steven Naismith of Hearts by Scott Brown of celtic. It was intentional, it was violent and would certainly have merited a red card had it been seen by the officials 

It was missed at the time, no action was taken and the responsibility therefore lies with the Compliance Officer to take the appropriate action.

There are clips on social media and the Compliance Officer should have no problem in finding footage of the incident. If necessary I can provide links on request.

I would greatly appreciate the courtesy of a reply acknowledging this email and that this violent act will not be tolerated in our game.

Thank you“

Will let you know if I hear anything. 

Grass

[Colin Traive 22,776]

3 minutes ago, Mr Soprano said:

Grass

[born a blue nose 90,772]

couldn't have happened to a better person

[Sparkle 53,587]

20 minutes ago, Inigo said:

Don't see how tbh. Looks more of a push with the sole of his boot into his ass. It's a yellow card. Hardly any force behind it.

In the same clip - anyone else notice broon's barge on the hearts player just before naismiths 'stamp'. The guy charges about like an out of control wrecking ball. 

[Inigo 32,528]

1 minute ago, Sparkle said:

In the same clip - anyone else notice broon's barge on the hearts player just before naismiths 'stamp'. The guy charges about like an out of control wrecking ball. 

Gets away with more than any other player would.

[eejay the dj 31,964]

Assuming he gets done 

Can the scum appeal and do we think there is a chance to manipulate this 

[MattyBlue 17,115]

2 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

Assuming he gets done 

Can the scum appeal and do we think there is a chance to manipulate this 

Has a retrospective red been overturned before ? Genuine question

[Brubear 2,920]

5 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

Assuming he gets done 

Can the scum appeal and do we think there is a chance to manipulate this 

I am sure the one thing the SFA have got right over the past few years is to set up processes for fast tracking appeals so they cannot be used to delay bans in order for clubs to influence which matches players miss.  Will be one worth watching assuming he is deemed guilty in the first place. 

[Bears r us 30,797]

1 hour ago, eejay the dj said:

Well done all the bears, that did their bit to get this bastard what he deserves 

Don't think for one second ,the scum wouldn't have done the same 

They probably wouldn't have had too mind

I was thinking what you have written above a wee while ago, it is great work that someone noticed this incident and started the ball rolling on twatter or whatever he used.

We need this season to start going on the attack against every hater who has tried to fuck us over the least few years, every fan needs to watch out for everything that the MSM media here try and sweep under that huge carpet that is bulging and highlight it to the SFA or whoever should be dealing with it.

I think as Rangers fans we see this season under Stevie G as a chance to get 55 and we should do everything we can to help in any way we can, dignified silence needs to be put aside and we need to fight for every advantage we can.

Rant over and I feel a lot better now.