bluepeter

What do you mean by 'until the name comes out.' It's out. Do you want him to tell you himself?

You're absolutely right, he has every right to apply for the job. Not as a director, particularly one who stood on independence. He definitely should have withdrawn from any contact with the club as a C1872 rep, almost definitely resigned.
He's damaged C1872, probably fatally. Well done to the three directors who resigned, principled People. Shame on those who didn't. 

You're absolutely right, he has every right to apply for the job. Not as a director, particularly one who stood on independence. He definitely should have withdrawn from any contact with the club as a C1872 rep, almost definitely resigned.
He's damaged C1872, probably fatally. Well done to the three directors who resigned, principled People. Shame on those who didn't. 

That's true, eskbankloyal has said from the start he didn't think Houston should be involved.

Don't know much about the two ladies, have a positive impression from the little I've heard. D'Art resigning tells me everything I need to know.
Edit: actually, I hope we get some clarity. It doesn't look good for C1872 though.

That's true, eskbankloyal has said from the start he didn't think Houston should be involved.

That's a familiar story...
Same shit, different shitstorm.

Said it to the three of you privately and will say it publicly - the 3 of you have shown absolute integrity and should be proud of yourselves. 
I stand firmly behind you all.

Statement from the three directors. Shocked that the behaviour of Craig Houston was behind this... 
 

Don't know much about the two ladies, have a positive impression from the little I've heard. D'Art resigning tells me everything I need to know.
Edit: actually, I hope we get some clarity. It doesn't look good for C1872 though.

Don't know much about the two ladies, have a positive impression from the little I've heard. D'Art resigning tells me everything I need to know.
Edit: actually, I hope we get some clarity. It doesn't look good for C1872 though.

Don't know much about the two ladies, have a positive impression from the little I've heard. D'Art resigning tells me everything I need to know.
Edit: actually, I hope we get some clarity. It doesn't look good for C1872 though.

Don't know much about the two ladies, have a positive impression from the little I've heard. D'Art resigning tells me everything I need to know.
Edit: actually, I hope we get some clarity. It doesn't look good for C1872 though.

Don't know much about the two ladies, have a positive impression from the little I've heard. D'Art resigning tells me everything I need to know.
Edit: actually, I hope we get some clarity. It doesn't look good for C1872 though.

RangersMedia is a forum which is open to all opinions, which in itself brings criticism from some parties because we do not moderate as they feel we should. We have an approach which allows opinions from all sides, which is something we believe in and something every one of us should appreciate. Having said that, even free speech comes with boundaries, and as you all know we remove offensive content on a regular basis. Whilst our team tries to read as many new comments as possible, we largely rely on people reporting offensive content to us via the websites report system.
We are disappointed that 3 of our members recently posted offensive material relating to young Jay Beatty, and we extend our apologies to him and his family. We do not condone mocking the disabled or infirm, in fact members of our not-for-profit site have raised over £50,000 in the past 4 years for donation to charitable causes including disability charities and Erskine Veteran’s Care Home. Our current fundraiser has raised almost £3,000 for a young lad Joshua Adair, who has a rare disease called Jeune’s syndrome, which has left him disabled.
Unfortunately, nobody reported this offensive material to RangersMedia Admin team and we remained unaware of it until today. The content was posted in the aftermath of the Old Firm game, which is always amongst our websites busiest times. Whilst we moderate for offensive content, we are pushed to cope with the volume of traffic in the aftermath of an Old Firm, let alone one taking place on Hogmanay –  recent content is quickly engulfed by new, and the offending material quickly disappears down the pages. Of course, as soon as the content was known to the Admin team it was removed.
We would ask our members to use the reporting system to let us know if any such material is posted in future, so that  we can remove it in a more timely fashion. Non-members who are offended by content on our site can easily contact us through RangersMedia, a member they know, or our Facebook page.

We have no ideas, no commitment, no clue how to defend, no ability to close down spaces.
Pedro had better be good!

We have no ideas, no commitment, no clue how to defend, no ability to close down spaces.
Pedro had better be good!

So much fucking space we give them to play in  

As much as I have no time for the board, he was underperforming and they obviously thought so too so when given an inch they took a mile and rightly got rid of them.
No hard feelings towards Mark and Davie though from me, Ally was an embarrassment in charge and they came in and gave us our pride back as well as a win over the manks whilst in a division below them. It just wasn't to be long term.
Cheers Mark.

RangersMedia is a forum which is open to all opinions, which in itself brings criticism from some parties because we do not moderate as they feel we should. We have an approach which allows opinions from all sides, which is something we believe in and something every one of us should appreciate. Having said that, even free speech comes with boundaries, and as you all know we remove offensive content on a regular basis. Whilst our team tries to read as many new comments as possible, we largely rely on people reporting offensive content to us via the websites report system.
We are disappointed that 3 of our members recently posted offensive material relating to young Jay Beatty, and we extend our apologies to him and his family. We do not condone mocking the disabled or infirm, in fact members of our not-for-profit site have raised over £50,000 in the past 4 years for donation to charitable causes including disability charities and Erskine Veteran’s Care Home. Our current fundraiser has raised almost £3,000 for a young lad Joshua Adair, who has a rare disease called Jeune’s syndrome, which has left him disabled.
Unfortunately, nobody reported this offensive material to RangersMedia Admin team and we remained unaware of it until today. The content was posted in the aftermath of the Old Firm game, which is always amongst our websites busiest times. Whilst we moderate for offensive content, we are pushed to cope with the volume of traffic in the aftermath of an Old Firm, let alone one taking place on Hogmanay –  recent content is quickly engulfed by new, and the offending material quickly disappears down the pages. Of course, as soon as the content was known to the Admin team it was removed.
We would ask our members to use the reporting system to let us know if any such material is posted in future, so that  we can remove it in a more timely fashion. Non-members who are offended by content on our site can easily contact us through RangersMedia, a member they know, or our Facebook page.

If all you can genuinely think to comment on is the fact that this small part of this fucking big story has been repeated (let me emphasise REPEATED) by the Sun then I seriously question your sanity. I just don't get your motivation for these posts at all. If it was only a story in the Sun we were discussing, I get it. You're at it.

You've got two minutes to elaborate on this post. Go.

So your comment was meant to be something which meant something completely different to what you posted?
"Seems to be acceptable on here now?" "perhaps I should just make up shite and speculate like many on here?" I often wonder why people who think "on here" is so bad they stick around for more. Is it masochism? I come to your defense often, honestly maybe too often.
I stand by my original comment in this thread. Your "I didn't mean what I posted (which is identical to shite I've posted before), I meant something completely different" defence is summarily dismissed. You're at it. 

You've got two minutes to elaborate on this post. Go.