islandblue 366 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 The point is does anyone believe he could have done this without the owner of the club in this case David Murray's knowledge.Do we believe Ticketus would hand over £20 million for the sale of something he did not own without so much as an enquiry to the owner at that time?Whyte has come clean because he was going to be found out.Time now for Murray to do the same Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 13,319 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 Hawl im a drunken bigot who tries to shag anything that movesAnd if it doesnt move....he will push it ! :lol: :lol: Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangersMedia 35,961 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 The brass neck he has shown is something elseAye. Also, I found out today his entire rhetoric about not knowing fully how much the tax liability would be is bullshit. Remem I said I'd speak to my tutor at uni? I did so today. I can't name him publicly on here but I was told that Mr.Whyte was fully aware of the potential consequences of the tax case. He was also aware of the liability of the "wee tax case" he refers to and blames for putting us into Administration. Enough of the lies Mr. Whyte, tell us the fucking truth because everyday you stay silent every single fibre of credibility you had is being destroyed. The thing is if this was his plan all along he would have to lie. If he came out with the truth (whatever the hell that is ) at the start he would most likely be up on a fraud charge just now.His actions weren't fraudulent but yeah if he'd said at the start what he was going to do then Murray would never have sold the club to him (I'd hope). Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 109,684 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 And if it doesnt move....he will push it ! :lol: :lol: :lol: Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 Did he honestly, honestly believe he could get away with it I'd be quite worried about his health if he did.And I would have gotten away with it too if it weren't for you meddling administrators. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 I'd have rfc52 down as shagger And you as...? I'm only agreeing to this film if I get to be Craig Whyte's missus's knickersShit I see thermo has that part already Alas , sorry to tell you but she does not wear said knickers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 Hawl im a drunken bigot who tries to shag anything that moves Funny thing is , Gordon Smith is also like that Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott12003 715 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 read this thread from start to finishone thing is clear there are still a lot of questions but no answerswho can give us these answers???maybe this is why a committee has been set up with a former judge who has dealt with insolvency in the past?who will know how these types of business deals work,inside outlooks to me like there is much more going on behind the scenes...... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
delparlane 5,720 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 This will make some fucking movie!Or a helluva gripping novel. Have no idea why (aye...I do ), but I keep picturing the end of Johnnie Stark the "Razor King" in my mind. I'm thinking CW's top priorites about now are a name change and a plastic makeover. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamFyfe 1,438 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 Whyte will make his money then boost! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ledge 3 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 Gone, gone, gone, gone,Yes my sins are gone.Now my soul is free and in my hearts a song. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
derek1872 548 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 I'd like to apologise for doubting everyone who was against whyte. Although I didn't voice my views, I doubted you all. At least now we are all in the same boat re whyte and can hopefully move forward. Apology accepted. Its time we all moved in the same direction. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nelsonRFC82 305 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 And I would have gotten away with it too if it weren't for you meddling administrators.Those medddling administrators that Whyte went to court to fight to appoint!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BolloBollo 36 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 Gone, gone, gone, gone,Yes my sins are gone.Now my soul is free and in my hearts a song.Haha the Robert Corbet tapes. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
derek1872 548 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 For the first time ever I so badly wanted to be wrong. It was far too obvious from day one though. No one with a past that looks as dodgy as his is going to be any good for a club like ours. Why it took so many so long to start to see it is beyond me but its good people are now seeing it. I said a while back that most would follow him off the cliff. Thankfully it looks like we might have avoided a total disaster and we might come back from this ok.One thing we should take from this is in future not be so quick to fire out the taig accusations and try to take on other peoples opinions and try to make sure we are all pulling in the same direction. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ledge 3 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 Haha the Robert Corbet tapes.The best of the best. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gash07 26 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 Ticketus own a good portion of our season tickets every year for the next 3. Those tickets will be valid unless we are liquidated, I assume.There will be no need to go after anyone for money, they have assets, that is their game. Its very simple.For the next 3 years our earning potential will be heavily depleted. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BritishBear 34 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 Ticketus own a good portion of our season tickets every year for the next 3. Those tickets will be valid unless we are liquidated, I assume.There will be no need to go after anyone for money, they have assets, that is their game. Its very simple.For the next 3 years our earning potential will be heavily depleted.Even if what he did was right and proper, how is essentially borrowing this amount and paying it off over 3 years, the best possible deal for Rangers. A 25 year mortgage would have been a better deal.What Whyte has effectively done is turn a business making a £10 million loss (with no european football) into a business making a £19 million loss. Thats some best possible deal. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vansteps 3 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 Do we boycott the administrators now You owe me a drink and a clean shirt......funny as fuck mate! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gash07 26 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 Even if what he did was right and proper, how is essentially borrowing this amount and paying it off over 3 years, the best possible deal for Rangers. A 25 year mortgage would have been a better deal.What Whyte has effectively done is turn a business making a £10 million loss (with no european football) into a business making a £19 million loss. Thats some best possible deal.Exactly. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marmalade1872 40 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 as ticketus dont have all the tickets it could mean you payingmuch as £100 more than the person next to you Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gash07 26 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 as ticketus dont have all the tickets it could mean you payingmuch as £100 more than the person next to youEh? Why? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 as ticketus dont have all the tickets it could mean you payingmuch as £100 more than the person next to youThat cant be true, ticketus sell the tickets at the full price but buy at a reduced rate, they do not sell the tickets at a. Higher price than Rangers do. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marmalade1872 40 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 That cant be true, ticketus sell the tickets at the full price but buy at a reduced rate, they do not sell the tickets at a. Higher price than Rangers do.it will be the same as going to a concert handling fee plus a surcharge as a way of getting a bit extra on their invesment Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod1822 1 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 If the ticketus money is secured against whyte... Could a potential new owner just not pay them / give them the tickets? Leave whyte to take the hit? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.