Thermopylae 15,286 Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 STV VersionPic: ©SNS GroupSignificant reforms to the Scottish Premier League’s rules on teams suffering an “insolvency event” have been discussed by member clubs.A meeting of all 12 teams at Hampden on Monday saw a number of proposals for amending current regulations, which currently see ten points docked from a team which goes into administration.One idea mooted would see a club in administration’s points from the previous three seasons averaged, then divided by three to determine how severe a penalty should be imposed.Team A, for example, which finished high up the SPL table for three seasons and averaged 60 points each year would lose 20 points from their tally.Team B, who have been a bottom six club for the previous three seasons, which averaged 30 points, would be deducted ten.A further option raised would see the current penalty of a ten point deduction applied over the course of more than one season.Also suggested was the possibility of imposing more severe punishments on clubs in the bottom half of the SPL table who are not in contention for a place in Europe.It was argued clubs challenging for a spot in the Champions League or Europa League would suffer greater if they went into administration, as they would find it near-impossible to be granted a UEFA club licence to participate.As clubs not competing for a place in Europe wouldn’t suffer that handicap, it was suggested they should suffer a greater points deduction.The SPL board will draw up proposals for the next meeting of clubs in April but the plans will not be put to a vote.Every member club of the SPL had representation at the meeting, with Rangers’ co-administrator Paul Clark also in attendance.Surely it would be much fairer if they were multiplied by 3 ... especially when it's big bad Rangers .Nice to see the SPL feel the need to dispense with democracy Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel Mustard 380 Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 You're suggesting I get banned from this board for speaking out against bigotry and the incitement of violence?That would look good for the forum, right?Fucking tarrier bastard.Too much of the priest's cock for you when you were an altar boy.I sympathise with you, ya papist cunt. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Strutherhill Loyal Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 Fucking tarrier bastard.Too much of the priest's cock for you when you were an altar boy.I sympathise with you, ya papist cunt.You must have been dragged up. Poor cunt. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunny_01 2,007 Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 Dear SPLDock us 30 points, kiss your away money goodbyeNow fuck offDadowell said Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guardian 4,281 Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 Why are clubs being treated differently in this ?I thought the point was we all had to abide by the rules, yet here are the rules being changed to suit, and being stacked against Rangers.Why should some clubs be deducted 10 points while others get 30 points taken off ?All we ask is some consistency. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,286 Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 Obviously because some clubs are Rangers and this is all being driven by liewell to wipe out the only opposition for years to come Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guardian 4,281 Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 Would even the tarriers be happy winning a series of tainted titles though ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BritishBear 34 Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 Would even the tarriers be happy winning a series of tainted titles though ?Do you not remember how low they sunk to win their last one? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
krissg910 110 Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 since we are already in administration, these rule changes surely wont affect us.thats like saying you get 15yrs for murder then 2 months later they change it to 20yrs minimum for a murder conviction and try to turn your 15 yrs into 20. legally that couldnt happen.so these rules would have to be from now on. meaning the next club to go into admin. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBluebells 6,898 Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 Would even the tarriers be happy winning a series of tainted titles though ?I think you know the answer to this. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rupert thebear 7 Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 Let the new owner buy Portsmouth or a Conf side and let a Rangers FC 2012 forget these people, some of the recent media, SFA, and SPL chairmen comments are bordering on ludicrous. Or the can help us. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Strutherhill Loyal Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 Let the new owner buy Portsmouth or a Conf side and let a Rangers FC 2012 forget these people, some of the recent media, SFA, and SPL chairmen comments are bordering on ludicrous. Or the can help us.Do you really think that Portsmouth or any Conf club wishes to stand aside as the bigoted mob take over?FFS delusions of grandeur or what? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rupert thebear 7 Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 Do you really think that Portsmouth or any Conf club wishes to stand aside as the bigoted mob take over?FFS delusions of grandeur or what?Talking about a Rangers 2012, not the Tims, thanks for the input though. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Strutherhill Loyal Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 Talking about a Rangers 2012, not the Tims, thanks for the input though.That's rich coming from someone who wears tartan jeans. :lol: :lol: Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
beattie72 170 Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 Away game boycott fuck these cunts. I wish we could just leave this stupid league. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
beattie72 170 Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 Away game boycott fuck these cunts. I wish we could just leave this stupid league. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
davy1shoe 63 Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 Of course they need our money!That wasn't my question though, who DOES benefit?Why does need to be a who benefits?It's all about making teams against us not benefit. With 30 points to make up brefore a ball is kicked top six is only real option so what's the point even bothering about away games. Save your money and buy loads stuff at ibrox. With 30 points off going for top six place is all there's os to enjoy and some cup games home only. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hemdale1873 167 Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 SKY TV - Contract of £85m starting next seasonThe Rangers haters just don't care anymore, they would happily do themselves damage to get to us that is why this kangaroo court was assembled yesterday.Liewell has the other spl clubs under his thumb and no doubt he has more or less threated that C*ltic would walk out on the spl anyway if they don't hammer us. The blood lust to see Rangers smashed is growing by the day and not just from that lot in the beast end. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdocherty72 215 Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 Fuck em all. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilko89 507 Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 TBH I think media were hoping for the redundancies to start last week/yesterday and have nothing more to say/print. So all this internet rumours shite is coming out. Titles taken off, 30 point deductions what a load of pish. Gretna - 10 points, Dundee - 10 points for first time, 25 for second. And the media are talking about 30, already on top of our 10? Don't believe it for a minute. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVB 2,560 Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 Cool story. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazzalivesforever 1,987 Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 They don't have the stones to do it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElwoodBlues 40 Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 Mmm wonder who is pushing this through. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skelf 1,153 Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 If were to happen then we really would need to look at boycotts. We can't let them away with this any longer Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimster2010 46 Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 Surely there is not a court in the land that would sanction this proposal. If the rules were to be changed there would have to be a starting date for this and any club that was already in administration ( US ) would be exempt. Then again, We all know how the " Sporting Integrity " crock of Sh*t helped us in the past. Think Manchester. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.