TheFarmer 260 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 http://www.rangers.c...ation-statement Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFarmer 260 Posted January 30, 2013 Author Share Posted January 30, 2013 The players who left?The transfer embargo?Something else? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBear. 8,499 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 Edit:I think it's actually about any monies received for the players will got to Oldco not Newco. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFarmer 260 Posted January 30, 2013 Author Share Posted January 30, 2013 Statement:RANGERS Football Club today received notification of the SFA Arbitration Panel’s decision which ruled that the Club did not inherit the right to continue the arbitration process started by oldco.This was always a possible outcome of what was purely a procedural hearing. Suspecting this would be the outcome, the Club had already filed a further Notice to Refer under SFA Article 99. This was done before the end of last year and that process will now continue. The Club had argued that since oldco’s registration had been transferred to newco the right to continue the case would also have transferred. Nothing has been won or lost at this stage and the Club will continue with its action. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 Im unsure which arbitration it means but it sounds like we've been shafted by the sfa yet again. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 I may be wrong, but sounds like only the oldco can challenge the decision... If thats the case, since the newco owns all the historical assets, then sureley they can't possibly try to take away titles. The oldco has no titles. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
delamonty 992 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 We will challenge this. As the Yanks say... No Brainer... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 ??? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFarmer 260 Posted January 30, 2013 Author Share Posted January 30, 2013 Im unsure which arbitration it means but it sounds like we've been shafted by the sfa yet again.How many was there?A quick google search brings up the transfer embargo appeal case and the TUPE transfer appeal case.Were those the only 2 Arbitration panel cases? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBear. 8,499 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 If thats the case, since the newco owns all the historical assets, then sureley they can't possibly try to take away titles. The oldco has no titles.I was a bit hasty. It's about the players I think. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teamgers 1,214 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 Nothing to see hear, move along please. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 How many was there?A quick google search brings up the transfer embargo appeal case and the TUPE transfer appeal case.Were those the only 2 Arbitration panel cases?I think so, sounds like its about the traitors but the statement could of been alot clearer. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kirkiebear 1,013 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 I think this is what Charles Green was on about when he was talking about us being oldco when it suits them, and us being a newco when it suits them. Them being the SFA/SPL of course. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdoggrfc1 44 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 just seen this came on here to see if anybody actually knew what it meant but i guess so far nobodys really sure Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fat malky 11 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 Im unsure which arbitration it means but it sounds like we've been shafted by the sfa yet again. now thats a surprise us getting shafted !!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nelsonRFC82 305 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 Not sure how this would be about the players that left?Those players left speficially because of rejecting the transfer to newco (and because they are money-hungry, disloyal rats!). Why would the oldco start an arbitration process with the SFA about players refusing to join newco? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wearethepeople1 3,897 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 I'm not 100% sure what this statement means!I read it as "SFA tell rangers you are getting fuck all money for the traitors that left for nothing"Is that close to the mark? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBear. 8,499 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 Doesn't really matter what it's about.Fight 'em all the way. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
VERITAS VOS LIBREBETS 3,333 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 I'm not 100% sure what this statement means!I read it as "SFA tell rangers you are getting fuck all money for the traitors that left for nothing"Is that close to the mark?Well said Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bazzl82 2 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 Ok n we're not a member of the sphell but they get cash for our games on sky n espn, fuckin rheptiles Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRITNEY IS NOT FEELING IT 8,293 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 Those bams don't stab ye in the back , it's straight through the fuckin heart . Make it up as they please .Expect a stronger statement from Charles ,the morra Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ritchieshearercaldow 22,241 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 Would this not apply to any appeals we had under the oldco that normally would have gone to arbitration, payments, players perhaps? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wearethepeople1 3,897 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 On twitter thereSky sports - rangers to continue to peruse compensation BBC sport - rangers newco REFUSED permission to peruse compensationThere's a a surprise then! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlippinEck 3,719 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 We paid footballing debts. If we are due any money, we should be entitled to it Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WadeWilson 4,670 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 Nothing to see hear, move along please. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.