blue No11 235 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 the Easdales have got few shares..............they are front men for a block of other shareholders. I don't think they'll ever have enough shares to control anything Agreed ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StornowayBlue 630 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 Agreed !80 - 100M for their buses and that might all change? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blue No11 235 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 80 - 100M for their buses and that might all change? The Easdales won't plough any of that money into the Bears. No chance ! They have put enough in to massage there egos I assure you they won't put anymore in. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,957 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 80 - 100M for their buses and that might all change?They won't be offered anywhere near that Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getstiffed 8,863 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 They won't be offered anywhere near thatIt'll need to be the right change either way. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,957 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 It'll need to be the right change either way.Aw day pal Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 The Easdales won't plough any of that money into the Bears. No chance ! They have put enough in to massage there egos I assure you they won't put anymore in.They run massage parlours too? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redsox1 1,361 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 They won't be offered anywhere near thatI thought they already knocked back £80M. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redsox1 1,361 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 The Easdales won't plough any of that money into the Bears. No chance ! They have put enough in to massage there egos I assure you they won't put anymore in.at least they put money in unlike the charlatans who pose as Real Rangers men who put nothing in.I also think the Easdales will put in more money if they do sell their bus company. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,957 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 I thought they already knocked back £80M.Think the Greenock paper were contacted by the other company to deny that mate.Pretty sure I read it on here Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redsox1 1,361 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 Think the Greenock paper were contacted by the other company to deny that mate.Pretty sure I read it on hereI don`t think we`ll even know the truth in these type of deals till it is done. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,151 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 This is laughable, people are jumping on the "Fuck Dave King" bandwagon?Rangers need money, Dave King has money, Dave King want's to give Rangers money, Rangers won't let him give them his money.To me it's a daft decision by Graham Wallace.Maybe GW is conducting a 120 day business review plan and one recommendation from his conclusions will be that the money of DK will benefit the club. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carson's cat 744 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 Maybe GW is conducting a 120 day business review plan and one recommendation from his conclusions will be that the money of DK will benefit the club.Why would he need 120 days to reach that conclusion? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Hubbard 280 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 point is the Easdales have hardly any shares........................ and are sitting on the board !Hey Easdales.......................are you Dave King or something ?you want control....buy shares !................and if you don't buy them................what are you doing on the board ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueAvenger 10,242 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 The return of Dave King is our best option.Wallace and King could work together and bring the investment that we badly need.Hopefully the 120 day plan will include investment from Dave King and others. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveJ 743 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 This reminds me of the Celtic takeover by McCann. He constantly wanted to invest in the club and then got fed up with people standing in his way, so he upped the ante and opted to buy out the shares of the very directors who ignored him.It scares me how Rangers fans can just brush this off. If King feels we are close to the shit tip again, I would listen - and do.I am surprised at Wallace not even talking to King. Why would that be? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redsox1 1,361 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 Why would he need 120 days to reach that conclusion?Because maybe King`s money isn`t needed. Maybe they have a self sustaining model planned. Maybe they have other investors. Maybe King wants too much for his investment. Who knows. Lets leave it to Wallace to decide. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,151 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 Why would he need 120 days to reach that conclusion?He doesn't but that's the current process i.e. look at all options then decide. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redsox1 1,361 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 This reminds me of the Celtic takeover by McCann. He constantly wanted to invest in the club and then got fed up with people standing in his way, so he upped the ante and opted to buy out the shares of the very directors who ignored him.It scares me how Rangers fans can just brush this off. If King feels we are close to the shit tip again, I would listen - and do.I am surprised at Wallace not even talking to King. Why would that be?Why would you think King would do anything if we were in the shit again ? He done zero in the past. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redsox1 1,361 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 The return of Dave King is our best option.Wallace and King could work together and bring the investment that we badly need.Hopefully the 120 day plan will include investment from Dave King and others.The return of King is not our best option.Our best option is to be self sustaining without the need of a sugar daddy.I`d prefer if King is nowhere near our club again. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnnyren 601 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carson's cat 744 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 The return of Dave King is our best option.Wallace and King could work together and bring the investment that we badly need.Hopefully the 120 day plan will include investment from Dave King and others.One thing is for certain. It will not be GW who decides whether or not to invite DK to come to the table. He may well recommend to his fellow directors that DK should be approached, but the ultimate decision will be made by Laxey and those who control the Easdales. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 It's clearly not going to be as simple as King offering to write a cheque and hand it over Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitre_mouldmaster 21,509 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 I thought they already knocked back £80M.I think it was £80bn mate.They said they were not going to accept a penny under £80,000,000,001.00The buying company decided that they would make £1 profit over the next 9,000 years, just in time for the buses to be phased out and replaced by teleporters. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carson's cat 744 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 The return of King is not our best option.Our best option is to be self sustaining without the need of a sugar daddy.I`d prefer if King is nowhere near our club again.I would also like the club to be self-sustaining, but it hasn't been for the last two years and it is not likely to be for the next two years at least. How do you suggest that we fill the gap in the meantime and raise enough capital to buy players to challenge Celtic? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.