Creampuff 22,628 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 Daft bastard. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wully 48,193 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 1 hour ago, BEE said: Second charge is, 'digital penetration' - had to think for a while what that is! The pokey for a poke. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cr3_bear 15,030 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 2 hours ago, BEE said: Second charge is, 'digital penetration' - had to think for a while what that is! Fingering under a sky dish Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gandalf the Blue 1,384 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 4 to 10 years! Honestly thought he'd see never jail time for this. What a silly bastard. Deserves all he gets. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
B1872 21,122 Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElBufalo20 7,984 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 What a stupid guy had a lovely gf stupid to waste it. However 10 years is outrageous. Not defending the guy cos going with someone like that when your gf is pregnant is out of order but for example if you meet a girl at the start of the week and she's 15 and you kiss her you're a paedophile but the Friday she's 16 you can do what you like to get then it's fine! It's a strange one. Just think these situations should be done case by case not made out to be a paedo like some of the genuine sickos out there Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
G.E.C. 19,104 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
graeme_4 35,295 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 8 hours ago, Sasa'onlyPLGsuccess'Papac said: What a stupid guy had a lovely gf stupid to waste it. However 10 years is outrageous. Not defending the guy cos going with someone like that when your gf is pregnant is out of order but for example if you meet a girl at the start of the week and she's 15 and you kiss her you're a paedophile but the Friday she's 16 you can do what you like to get then it's fine! It's a strange one. Just think these situations should be done case by case not made out to be a paedo like some of the genuine sickos out there Clearly are defending him. She's 15. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben10 2,294 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 28 minutes ago, graeme_4 said: Clearly are defending him. She's 15. He made reasonable suggestion, your stubbornness at the table of reason is what sets alarm bells off for me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
graeme_4 35,295 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 1 hour ago, yermaw145 said: He made reasonable suggestion, your stubbornness at the table of reason is what sets alarm bells off for me. So it's not as bad if she's just under the legal age, versus being a good few years younger. Neither is alright, a paedophile is a paedophile regardless. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creampuff 22,628 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 Don't feel enough was said about this at the time Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben10 2,294 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 30 minutes ago, graeme_4 said: So it's not as bad if she's just under the legal age, versus being a good few years younger. Neither is alright, a paedophile is a paedophile regardless. We're not talking about moral boundaries, we are talking about the capricious laws dreamed up in the West that make it increasingly difficult for frivolous young men to stay out of jail. If you say Adam Johnson is a paedophile (which by definition he is not because the term 'peadophilia' is applied to adults with a sexual preference toward children 11 years or younger) because he engaged in sexual activity with a willing partner who later testified against him for the sake of her families dignity after the affair was discovered, by her yapping, then what if that girl was born a few short months earlier ? It would be totally legal. The same outcome applies, whichever moral stance you take. If you want Adam Johnson to rot in prison, then you must also want the age of consent to be recalibrated. You should believe that a man, whichever age, should not have sex with a girl unless she is around 18. That is the position you should take, and I neither condemn nor condone it. If you cannot grasp how fatuous that circumstance is then you don't belong in the discussion. Condemning a person for trying to ask that question is suspect in my opinion. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FSM 20,892 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 25 minutes ago, Creampuff said: Don't feel enough was said about this at the time Apparently had a picture of his nob on a big screen at court for folk to debate how trimmed his pubes were. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 55 9,311 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 10 minutes ago, yermaw145 said: We're not talking about moral boundaries, we are talking about the capricious laws dreamed up in the West that make it increasingly difficult for frivolous young men to stay out of jail. If you say Adam Johnson is a paedophile (which by definition he is not because the term 'peadophilia' is applied to adults with a sexual preference toward children 11 years or younger) because he engaged in sexual activity with a willing partner who later testified against him for the sake of her families dignity after the affair was discovered, by her yapping, then what if that girl was born a few short months earlier ? It would be totally legal. The same outcome applies, whichever moral stance you take. If you want Adam Johnson to rot in prison, then you must also want the age of consent to be recalibrated. You should believe that a man, whichever age, should not have sex with a girl unless she is around 18. That is the position you should take, and I neither condemn nor condone it. If you cannot grasp how fatuous that circumstance is then you don't belong in the discussion. Condemning a person for trying to ask that question is suspect in my opinion. But he knew he was breaking the law. Is he as bad as a person who preys on young children...of course not. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben10 2,294 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 58 minutes ago, Big Al II said: But he knew he was breaking the law. Is he as bad as a person who preys on young children...of course not. And people who smoke cannabis to ease their health ailments know they are breaking the law. Again, these partitions are neither here nor there. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 55 9,311 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 7 hours ago, yermaw145 said: And people who smoke cannabis to ease their health ailments know they are breaking the law. Again, these partitions are neither here nor there. What's your point, they can have no complaints if they're charged! I suppose they could say 'well it might be legal next week' Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEE 4,880 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 10 hours ago, Creampuff said: Don't feel enough was said about this at the time I quoted that in here and everyone ignored it Must just be us. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thewhitesettler 2,712 Posted March 6, 2016 Share Posted March 6, 2016 15 hours ago, yermaw145 said: And people who smoke cannabis to ease their health ailments know they are breaking the law. Again, these partitions are neither here nor there. People with health problems, use cannabis to ease their PAIN. What fucking PAIN is Johnson easing by fucking a 15 year old girl? You can't compare the two! I hope you're not a lawyer mate, your arguments are rank rotten, well this one is. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wully 48,193 Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 He belled Ched Evans to find out what its like in jail according to the Metro. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gandalf the Blue 1,384 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Sentencing today. Already appealed against one conviction I think. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueballss 2,975 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 stripped of england caps? how do they show line-ups, goals, assists he was in? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.T.G 10,773 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 On 5 March 2016 at 9:55 AM, yermaw145 said: He made reasonable suggestion, your stubbornness at the table of reason is what sets alarm bells off for me. I read your post in an Obi-Wan Kenobi type dialogue Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.T.G 10,773 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Judge coming down hard, reckon he will get 2 years at least, maybe more Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz52 11,837 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Judge currently wrapping everything up. My guess is 4 years Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.T.G 10,773 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Judge to Adam Johnson: "The victim was an SAFC fan, you were her favourite player, she had a crush on you. "She had only just turned 15 when you began to groom her. "You knew her age." Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.