Jamie0202 12,565 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 3 minutes ago, Laudrupsleftfoot said: Some of his touches and passing in the second half was very good. Would definitely have more assists with better players on the end of them. Think being kept on for the full game might mean Clement’s not planning on playing him In the final though. I think the extra space in the middle in the 2nd half helped. I don't understand the reasoning behind the bit in bold at all mate. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGM_72 3,729 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 Think we need to bin having a number ten to have any success and I think he'll be a victim of that. Doesn't do it enough. Colin Traive 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeyserSoze 14,702 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 He needs to play in the final. Simple as that Blue Skies 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glasgowrangersafc 440 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 Just now, AGM_72 said: Think we need to bin having a number ten to have any success and I think he'll be a victim of that. Doesn't do it enough. What shape do we play without a 10? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGM_72 3,729 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 1 minute ago, Glasgowrangersafc said: What shape do we play without a 10? 433, one 6 and two 8s in the middle. esquire8 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudrupsleftfoot 11,363 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 3 minutes ago, Jamie0202 said: I think the extra space in the middle in the 2nd half helped. I don't understand the reasoning behind the bit in bold at all mate. I know Lawrence wasn’t available but just a feeling. He doesn’t often keep Cantwell on for the full game and would hazard a guess never when he’s planned to play him in a big one. Though I know there’s still well more than a week until the final. We look our best on the eye as a team when Cantwell is seeing a lot of the ball. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Specky Forum Organiser 66,407 Posted May 14 Author Share Posted May 14 Can only play in the final if it's him and someone(likely Silva) playing off Dessers with 3 CMs behind. CoplandRoad83 and AGM_72 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEPPS BOY 75,090 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 Just now, The Specky Forum Organiser said: Can only play in the final if it's him and someone(likely Silva) playing off Dessers with 3 CMs behind. This. The Specky Forum Organiser 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudrupsleftfoot 11,363 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 Yep that’s what I’d go with too. We don’t have a good enough midfield 2 to get the better of theirs. But if we’re on about quality he has to play. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivybank 4,637 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 Excellent second half tonight ,the amount of running he does of the ball is unbelievable if he was in the scum team with their front players he’d be a star ,still baffling he never played against them ,must start in the cup final Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudrupsleftfoot 11,363 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 Seems Clement’s anger first half largely directed at Cantwell from the post match press conference. Talks about being very happy with him second half but he has to do it all the time with and without the ball. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudrupsleftfoot 11,363 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 Cantwell’s last game at Ibrox going by his post match interview. Fuck sake. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Specky Forum Organiser 66,407 Posted May 14 Author Share Posted May 14 1 minute ago, Laudrupsleftfoot said: Cantwell’s last game at Ibrox going by his post match interview. Fuck sake. What did he say? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-Maestro 11,842 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 1 minute ago, Laudrupsleftfoot said: Cantwell’s last game at Ibrox going by his post match interview. Fuck sake. He's continually ignored the managers instructions then did his daft stuff on social media. Do you think the manager should accept that? graeme_4 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudrupsleftfoot 11,363 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 Just now, The Specky Forum Organiser said: What did he say? It’s more his demeanour, looked emotional. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudrupsleftfoot 11,363 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 Just now, J-Maestro said: He's continually ignored the managers instructions then did his daft stuff on social media. Do you think the manager should accept that? Continually ignored is a bit exaggerated. Going by Clement’s post match comments he’s really happy with Cantwell on the ball, but is warning him if he wants to be a top player he has to always do it off the ball as well. I’d want Clement to try and get that out of him would be my first preference. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-Maestro 11,842 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 2 minutes ago, Laudrupsleftfoot said: Continually ignored is a bit exaggerated. Going by Clement’s post match comments he’s really happy with Cantwell on the ball, but is warning him if he wants to be a top player he has to always do it off the ball as well. I’d want Clement to try and get that out of him would be my first preference. That's on Cantwell completely though, maybe he doesn't want to be the player he can be. Plenty of players aren't willing to do it. Whether he's sold or not I'll trust Clement's decision. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudrupsleftfoot 11,363 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 2 minutes ago, J-Maestro said: That's on Cantwell completely though, maybe he doesn't want to be the player he can be. Plenty of players aren't willing to do it. Whether he's sold or not I'll trust Clement's decision. Does that go the same for Tav, Goldson and Lundstram? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Specky Forum Organiser 66,407 Posted May 14 Author Share Posted May 14 Aye he's obviously not happy in his interview, if he is off then he has nobody to blame but himself. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris182 6,367 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 Just now, The Specky Forum Organiser said: Aye he's obviously not happy in his interview, if he is off then he has nobody to blame but himself. My thoughts exactly, if him and the gaffer don't get on there's only one winner. The Specky Forum Organiser 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-Maestro 11,842 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 2 minutes ago, Laudrupsleftfoot said: Does that go the same for Tav, Goldson and Lundstram? Yes, why wouldn't it? We don't have a single player in our squad who isn't replaceable at the moment. I think Goldson and Lundstrams time is up anyway. Tav can go if he wants to, although I think he may have a part to play and will likely want to retire here. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudrupsleftfoot 11,363 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 2 minutes ago, J-Maestro said: Yes, why wouldn't it? We don't have a single player in our squad who isn't replaceable at the moment. I think Goldson and Lundstrams time is up anyway. Tav can go if he wants to, although I think he may have a part to play and will likely want to retire here. I meant if Clement continues to rely on them as regulars. Clearly sounds like he wanted Lundstram to sign a new deal. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaiserJon 12,480 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 1 minute ago, Laudrupsleftfoot said: I meant if Clement continues to rely on them as regulars. Clearly sounds like he wanted Lundstram to sign a new deal. You always seem to make not outrageous suggestions but ones just bordering on them. You are more Laudrupslefttoe than the actual foot. The Specky Forum Organiser 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-Maestro 11,842 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 2 minutes ago, Laudrupsleftfoot said: I meant if Clement continues to rely on them as regulars. Clearly sounds like he wanted Lundstram to sign a new deal. We all did when he was on form, soon as he got a whiff elsewhere he stopped giving a fuck. I think it's a difficult one in that if we don't manage to get proper replacements in for anyone then he has to work with what he's got. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valance1690 3,947 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 Completely fine with him calling out Cantwell or players in general for that matter. Cantwell hasn't helped himself in his time here with the daft social media shite, needs someone around him to give him a slap. Clement does seem to pick and choose who he defends though, defending Lundstram (who for all purposes is out the door) after Saturday was daft & a few days later blames Cantwell's off the ball work in the first half...pretty sure both goals came down our right side & were caused by 1) Not stopping the crosses & 2) Shit defending on both occasions from King. SwallowsHisOwnSpunk 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.