kelloger 0 Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 4-5-1 ------------Boruc---------- Hinkel-Bougherra-Mcmanus-Papac -Mcgeady-Brown-Mendes-Thomson--Nakamura- --------------McDonald----------- Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
polar bear 0 Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 Nakamura is shite. And that's why fan's don't make good managers. His range of passing is fantastic and the space he makes for others is what makes him impressive. Really Got to agree with Stelle here Muff,I also think Nakamura is a cracking player. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasGers 96 Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 Boruc over Mcgregor. I hate Boruc with a passion, but you cant argue he is excellent on a good day. Hinkel over Broadfoot. Broadfoot is awful. Hinkel is to but is still better. Caldwell over Weir. Weir is old and Caldwell seems solid at times. Scott Brown over Ferguson. Brown is Celtics best player and probably the best in the SPL right now. Mcgeady over....? Thats right, we have no LM so id have him or Maloney. Nakamura over Davis. This is only because Davis isnt a RM and Nakamura just pulls of a single slice of magic that wins Celtic games. Of course, Davis is a much better player if played in the right position. Mcdonald over Miller: Miller is awful, and Mcdonald scores in big games. Thats about it for me. You're just missing a 'y' from the end of your name It would have been easier for him to just say he prefers all of Celtics players.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 Doesn't do enough, too much of a passenger, hides and is slightly injury prone these days. I certainly wouldn't want him in my team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
minstral 5,375 Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 Boruc over Mcgregor. I hate Boruc with a passion, but you cant argue he is excellent on a good day. Hinkel over Broadfoot. Broadfoot is awful. Hinkel is to but is still better. Caldwell over Weir. Weir is old and Caldwell seems solid at times. Scott Brown over Ferguson. Brown is Celtics best player and probably the best in the SPL right now. Mcgeady over....? Thats right, we have no LM so id have him or Maloney. Nakamura over Davis. This is only because Davis isnt a RM and Nakamura just pulls of a single slice of magic that wins Celtic games. Of course, Davis is a much better player if played in the right position. Mcdonald over Miller: Miller is awful, and Mcdonald scores in big games. Thats about it for me. me thinks that you are a lover of the darkside. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
polar bear 0 Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 4-5-1 ------------Boruc---------- Hinkel-Bougherra-Mcmanus-Papac -Mcgeady-Brown-Mendes-Thomson--Nakamura- --------------McDonald----------- Away and rattle your beeds scumbag. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 It would have been easier for him to just say he prefers all of Celtics players.... Hold on! I'm claiming that scalp, I got in (just) before papa Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelloger 0 Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 Away and rattle your beeds scumbag. good team , Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasGers 96 Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 It would have been easier for him to just say he prefers all of Celtics players.... Hold on! I'm claiming that scalp, I got in (just) before papa Fair enough, although it sometimes takes more than one to take them out! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbiemac 0 Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 id say mcgeady, hinkel, mcmanus over weir, mcdonald over miller imagine that team: mcshagger hinkel bougherra mcmanus papac davis mendes ferguson mcgeady mcdonald boyd fuck off Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 Away and rattle your beeds scumbag. good team , Aye for somebody whose mother is his sister. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goianegra 4,686 Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Flood's a decent player and I'd have Zaluska before Boruc on current form. I'd sooner play Boruc up front that in goal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jardy 0 Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Hinkel is better than Broadfoot and Hinkel is brutal. That's how pish I think Kirk Broadfoot is. Brown over Ferguson. McDonald over Boyd and Miller. hhmmmm shock horror, boyd is the more natural goalscorer and yes we all know how you feel about him but my question were teams like lazio in for mcdonald? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruaridhmac 29 Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Celtic actually have proper wingers in Mcgeady and Nakamura, unlike us. Nakamura can be quite hit and miss though. Apart from that our team is pretty solid compared to the mhanks... duno how were 4 points behind tho Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMWWBK 0 Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Nakamura and McDonald would be the only two i'd take. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_glasgow 2 Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Hinkel is better than Broadfoot and Hinkel is brutal. That's how pish I think Kirk Broadfoot is. Brown over Ferguson. McDonald over Boyd and Miller. hhmmmm shock horror, boyd is the more natural goalscorer and yes we all know how you feel about him but my question were teams like lazio in for mcdonald? McDonald has a better goal:game ratio. all round better player...simple Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebestest 2,148 Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 None of the bastards, thats all I have to say. They are welcome to our cast offs such as Pressley, Robson and Mark Brown. Fuck them we are Rangers and we are the people. Amen! I can't believe people are saying they'd have McGeady - I wouldn't take him if we were paid. He is a sinister, foul little creature - the fans of whom preach national pride yet he chooses to play for Ireland. The smug, self-satisfaction of some of their players (McDonald, Hartson, Robson, McGreedy, Caldwell, Boruc) makes me feel sick. As for Strachan, he is like the apologetic father who is embarrassed to learn that the gaggle of children he abandoned in his youth have been raised as tearaways by a fretting, incapable mother who complained to the headmaster when her children were verbally provoked yet they were the playground bullies. None of them thanks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Hinkel is better than Broadfoot and Hinkel is brutal. That's how pish I think Kirk Broadfoot is. Brown over Ferguson. McDonald over Boyd and Miller. hhmmmm shock horror, boyd is the more natural goalscorer and yes we all know how you feel about him but my question were teams like lazio in for mcdonald? hhmmmmm shock horror, McDonald is a better all round player and he scores goals. His goals have helped win celtc the SPL, Old Firm and Champions League games and yes we all know how you feel about Boyd. Did Lazio EVER make a bid - I seem to remember their chairman saying he hadn't even heard of him - Birmingham and Cardiff are the only teams to ever make an offer. But if you want to be like that, Scott McDonald has been RUMOURED with moves to Aston Villa, Newcastle and Everton - means fuck all tho. Over to you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_glasgow 2 Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 _____________McGregor____________ _Hinkel _Bougherra_Cauldwell__Papac_ _Nakamura_Davis___Mendes__McGeady_ ________Hessilenk___McDonal________ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasGers 96 Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Boyd and McDonald are two completely different players, who each do different things well, so I'm not sure a viable comparison can be made. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hotchilli Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Being a neutral, here is my current view based on watching Scottish games. Nakamura. Really classy and would fit into the Rangers team. He can be ineffective in open play but his corners and free kicks are almost always dangerous. Rangers don't have anything similar. McGeady causes all Scottish defenses trouble. Rangers are weak in this area. Boyd. Can't argue with the facts. He reminds me of Aly McCoist - Professional Poacher. Would make it into any Scottish team. Celtic don't have this type of predator. Naylor for Celtic is very poor. It's not hard to see why Celtic are desperate to replace him. Rangers trump in that LB position. McGregor. Good consistent goalkeeper. Boruc very talented and has that Grobbelar/ Schmeical (sic) edge that McGregor has, but is more prone to blunders but also to brillancies. I can't separate them. Barry Ferguson. Supporter first, player second. I don't think Celtic have a ball winning midfield player who has club passion. But Scot Brown looks to be growing as a player. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Boyd and McDonald are two completely different players, who each do different things well, so I'm not sure a viable comparison can be made. I think the opposite, i think they are the same. Like Boyd McDonald gets a hard time from Celtic fans if he doesn't score. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
smiddy 36 Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 am i on the right site,,,,,,,its like a smeltic fan club the way some of carry on nakamura good,,ffs cmon, mcdonald over boyd,,count the goals, mgreedy in our team, one good game in ten,,, done nothin this season,, brown is the new darling of the media,,last year mgreedy,,he couldnay lace thompsons boots,, who do u want mendez and davis midfield or robson and naka,, mcgregor or the roly poly goalie ,, cmon troops were better than that shite weve got to believe in our selves,, never mind smith doing the negative stuff ,,tell the players to get out there play the football they can play and we would horse them any time Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,683 Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 would take brown or crosas until thomson is fit would have caldwell in for weir (he's too old unfortunately) until we can afford better would have robson in LM, he won them the league last year after getting a run in the team when brown got suspended macdonald up front with boyd would score 3 a game between them, fuck boruc, we have 2 better keepers than that fucking bell-end fuck mcgeady, a one trick pony WITHOUT the fucking trick naka is too easily bullied, when was the last celtic game he dominated and ran the show in mcmanus is a fucking diddy, in fact he's CAPTAIN DIDDY, worst player at their club Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Hinkel is better than Broadfoot and Hinkel is brutal. That's how pish I think Kirk Broadfoot is. Brown over Ferguson. McDonald over Boyd and Miller. hhmmmm shock horror, boyd is the more natural goalscorer and yes we all know how you feel about him but my question were teams like lazio in for mcdonald? McDonald has a better goal:game ratio. all round better player...simple Are you sure about that? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts