Jump to content

Rfc#1.

Senior Member
  • Posts

    7,615
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    Rfc#1. reacted to BarneyRabble in Jon Daly Loyal   
    Have you ever seen a " good Bear" wave an Irish Tricolour?
  2. Like
    Rfc#1. reacted to TravelingWilBEARy in Jon Daly Loyal   
    To be fair, even McCoist missed a lot of sitters. It's about continually being in the right position though.
  3. Like
    Rfc#1. reacted to Carsons Dog in Accounts out this morning   
    I've just come over the Erskine Bridge - you should see the queue
    The Sons of Struth are at the front, followed by 3 names, Furry, Greenslade, the RST, the goon brigade, the UB's, the Assembly and Spiers
    The Samaritans have drafted people in from all over Scotland
    Fuck going 'doon the water' on The Waverley today
    Edit - there goes Delightful Dennis as well
  4. Like
    Rfc#1. reacted to Malvern in Chris Graham - Why the hatred?   
    Ref the post from host you were quoting, I can only see two carelessly worded "allegations" (but nothing he declares as fact, think more likely mistakes), which is not over the top when it is obviously a heated interaction between you two. The rest were worded with "imo" and "maybe", which in paper talk is "I will throw something out and see if it explodes". Good for the goose, good for the gander on that mark.
    Your also making a fair few digs about him yourself and to be fair he does not appear on the tele or quote publicly opinions concerning our Rangers, he does as he said air his own opinion on a Rangers forum, rightly or wrongly, he is also entiltled to do it within reason (Maybe where Ed got it a tad wrong, I don't know, but I don't want to get involved in that as he can only speak for himself, the Irony of me speaking for Host is not lost on me).
    Some things you say are good and seem sound so many understand, some things might seem agenda driven or close to the bone and that gets people's backs up. It is the nature of the role you have taken upon yourself to have the status to be given money by the Beeb for your views, hence the "jealousy" which is sometimes mentioned of those who do not agree with you. Some people do not have this platform to speak for things Rangers, as you do, is not always "jealousy", maybe it is as Host states, someone just having his say on a forum and not making an ars3 of himself in public (not that I am saying you are doing/done that, just the other side of the publicity angle, ala Green).
    Still I think host is right to have his opinion read, recently the "observation/accusation" you will not engage in topics/questions/subjects you do not like is also a bit worrying. You do however get good credit from me for engaging in this one (not that you care, but if it helps I don't care if you care ).
    Not really a lecture, not really advice as I am not qualified, kick 7 bells of sh1t out of each other if you want. Just giving you my view on what I perceive as the situation.
  5. Like
    Rfc#1. reacted to thehost in Chris Graham - Why the hatred?   
    No I've not tried
    And I never told you I was in the members
    Suck must have told you
    I'm too busy in life to get involved at the moment.
    If I am ever not too busy and think I can add something I will until that time I will give my opinion whether people agree disagree or think its downright pish
  6. Like
    Rfc#1. reacted to thehost in Chris Graham - Why the hatred?   
    Tell me why don't you ask that of the people's piper, deedle or anyone else.
    Forums have always had pseudonyms you are the exception rather than the rule.
    You seem to think it gives your view more validity because we know who you are whereas it does nothing of the sort. I am no one of any consequence apart from a supporter of The Rangers.
    Couple of points what you would call allegations I would refer to as observations I.e. I make statements based upon what I witness then add in what I have seen in RL to give me a basis for what I type.
    They are my opinion, not fact, my opinion.
    I comment on areas where I have experience (business) and areas where I have none (riding Kelly brook), it makes not one jot of difference whether you know me as host or my real name.
    Just as everyone else who posts are giving their opinion.
    You accept it or treat it as trash.
    My view is at least consistent. It maybe, in your eyes wrong but at least it's consistently wrong
  7. Like
    Rfc#1. reacted to thehost in Chris Graham - Why the hatred?   
    Shares are up because they are unrealistically low, theres a board room battle and people have now started buying them
    The damage was done much earlier on by the constant antics of the usual suspects
    They went out of their way to destabilise the club to lower the share price and to get their arses on board
    Some will think that is great
    Some will think its not
    Personally I want no one (senior exec or above) from David murrays time anywhere near that board. Others differ.
  8. Like
    Rfc#1. reacted to Smile in Chris Graham - Why the hatred?   
    I still dont get why blue and true is in this thread at all. just let Chris answer himself. What's the point of him being a spokesman if you and Frankie do his talking for him.
  9. Like
    Rfc#1. reacted to Getstiffed in Chris Graham - Why the hatred?   
    Chris Graham expects to be allowed cart blanche to scrutinize other people behaviour (both outwith and within our support) but spits the dummy out when anyone scrutinizes his.
  10. Like
    Rfc#1. reacted to 16BlueSherbert90 in Chris Graham - Why the hatred?   
    Unban him then I don't agree with some of the stuff Ed does or says on here any more than what quite a few Bears get away with saying, but I wouldn't say he was worthy of a ban neither. This banning bears who have in time made decent contribution to the site is getting crazy. Is no-one allowed to have any kind of opinion no matter how controversial it sounds? Did it break FoCUS monitoring codes or something?This is poor craic. Most bears need their heads banging together on here at times. You are all crazy!
  11. Like
    Rfc#1. reacted to cstamomusa in Chris Graham - Why the hatred?   
    Chris why do you keep signing in and reading this thread and not replying?
  12. Like
    Rfc#1. reacted to The Beast in Chris Graham - Why the hatred?   
    What? Are we reading the same thread?
    The only quotes relating to finance as far as I can see are those relating to allegedly being paid by the BBC. That's feck all to do with his personal financial position be it good or bad. It's everything to do with being in the employ of the very organisation who have an agenda against the club and the fans.
  13. Like
    Rfc#1. reacted to minstral in Chris Graham - Why the hatred?   
    ED brought more to the board than Fury ever did. To be honest his knowledge of Rangers history, and some of his tales about the club were fantastic.
  14. Like
    Rfc#1. reacted to clan macrae in Chris Graham - Why the hatred?   
    It takes all kinds to make a world.What may seem unreasonable to you can be seen as perfectly reasonable to others.There are a lot of complaints on the Forum regarding the Daily Rhebal distorting and exagerating anything to do with Rangers.I would rather have guys like Ed telling it as they see it.By the way i dont always agree with Ed but i defend his right to reply.
  15. Like
    Rfc#1. reacted to CaptainofIndustry in Imran hits back via Bill McMurdo   
    Are you not concerned at McColl's way of working here, though? Wilfully driving down the share price with carefully timed media leaks in order to force the hand of those he sees as his opponents? Refusing to invest, laughably claiming his money "is not necessary here"? Repeatedly being drawn into a war of words, i.e. Green "does not deserve one penny"? Dictating the makeup of the new board and insisting an ex-David Murray era non-exec gets an executive position? Who exactly appointed McColl as kingmaker and rabble-rouser in chief until he gets his way?
  16. Like
    Rfc#1. reacted to 16BlueSherbert90 in Imran hits back via Bill McMurdo   
    Telling people to eff off doesn't work for me. I would prefer to see them stop airing dirty laundry about each other and just give us fans the clarity of what is going on with the club finances and what they intend on doing to help the clubs financial status thrive for the long term.
    B*tching back and forth about Chris Graham, Imran and whoever else does the club no good and just makes us look amateur.
  17. Like
    Rfc#1. reacted to Resting in my account in Imran hits back via Bill McMurdo   
    We live in a democracy, Imran Ahmed is fully entitles to the right to reply and Bill McMurdo is Rangers blogger, a much better outlet than the Daily Rebel to have his say. Not sure what the fuss is about on that score
  18. Like
    Rfc#1. reacted to Sea Bear in Imran hits back via Bill McMurdo   
    Gotta to say without taking sides at present, what if there is an element of truth in the figures for the next 5 to 10 years, seems an awful lot of folk more eager to believe we are going back into admin than acknowledge that things maybe while not ideal aren't as black as some would have us believe.
  19. Like
    Rfc#1. got a reaction from TBKisjustaTOY in Ahmad Suing Rangers   
    Furry just loves anything negative at Rangers. No concern at the 3.4mill. just looks for a wee dig to have. Anything detrimental to Rangers is gravy to you. Will u be on tv later?
  20. Like
    Rfc#1. got a reaction from mongolikecandy in Glasgow Boyne Celebrations and Central Scotland   
    This threads hoaching with tims looking to be offended.
  21. Like
    Rfc#1. reacted to 1st_Jan_1994 in Glasgow Boyne Celebrations and Central Scotland   
    I'm not overly religious even though I do believe in a God and have believe in Christian values
    I love the parades for purely patriotic reasons - I'm a loyalist
    You don't have to be a church going Protestant to enjoy the parades that's a popular myth taigs and handwringers love to throw about
  22. Like
    Rfc#1. reacted to OLE SUPER WILBERT in Glasgow Boyne Celebrations and Central Scotland   
    Your first sentence is very ironic.
  23. Like
    Rfc#1. reacted to norgerpd in McCoist might not be up to this job   
    Who the hell are the players that you would rather have on the pitch?
    Have you seen our squad?
    I dont think for one sec that Coisty tells them to go out and fire high balls to wee MacKay.Our players have no compusure and very little ability that is why we generally see them panicking and punting the ball as far up the pitch as they can.
    Oh,and by the by,what world reknowned manager do you think will answer our call and come enjoy the delights of Scot Div 3?
    Get real and back Ally.He so fucking deserves it.
  24. Like
    Rfc#1. reacted to El Carpintero in McCoist might not be up to this job   
    It is funny the difference in receptions between a mod starting a thread like this and a normal member of RM starting one similar.
  25. Like
    Rfc#1. reacted to Potdog in As Rfc52 said the other night   
    Is there any need for our own fans to be against each other because of songs?
    Seriously guy's we are on a forum and people are going to have different opinions and views.
    As bears we are supposed to be a family not enemies.
×
×
  • Create New...