How much can you give?

[andyalbertz 0]

It would really depend on the circumstances, thankfully it won't come to that (we hope). I think we give alot in any case, ticket sales, setanta and now sky and espn subscriptions, 2 or 3 new strips each year. Hopefully when the club is eventually sold the new owners will realise that if they are sensible they have a good commercial base to work from. By sensib;le I mean not wasting Millions on the like of Mcculoch, Velicka, Lafferty, etc.

I hate seeing sky subscriptions being used in totaling amounts spent on Rangers. No offence.

I know what you mean, I had Sky anyway but some people must have subscribed just to watch Rangers. I think it's fair to add it as an expense for football fans of all teams.

I disagree. You subcribe as a customer of sky. Your subscription charge is payed to sky.

[Sgt. Pepper 117]

100 quid, would pay alot more if I had it tho

[Right_To_Censor 1,951]

between 300 - 700 quid, as long as it ain't on a bill week.

[Railcard 2]

100 quid, would pay alot more if I had it tho

same but i wouldnt judge any fans who couldnt because they had shelled our tonnes on a season book

[mccoist355 4]

200-300

[gsa 3,906]

It would really depend on the circumstances, thankfully it won't come to that (we hope). I think we give alot in any case, ticket sales, setanta and now sky and espn subscriptions, 2 or 3 new strips each year. Hopefully when the club is eventually sold the new owners will realise that if they are sensible they have a good commercial base to work from. By sensib;le I mean not wasting Millions on the like of Mcculoch, Velicka, Lafferty, etc.

I hate seeing sky subscriptions being used in totaling amounts spent on Rangers. No offence.

I know what you mean, I had Sky anyway but some people must have subscribed just to watch Rangers. I think it's fair to add it as an expense for football fans of all teams.

I disagree. You subcribe as a customer of sky. Your subscription charge is payed to sky.

I know it does? I never said it didn't. However Sky pays the Leagues who the then pay the clubs alot of money for the rights.

Football clubs are heavily relient on our Sky Sports subscriptions and for many of us football is the main reason for subscribing, therfore it is fair to say that Sky Sports is part of the expense of following modern football.

[simon 1,758]

£700 I really hope it doesnt come to that though because thats all my savings

[andyalbertz 0]

It would really depend on the circumstances, thankfully it won't come to that (we hope). I think we give alot in any case, ticket sales, setanta and now sky and espn subscriptions, 2 or 3 new strips each year. Hopefully when the club is eventually sold the new owners will realise that if they are sensible they have a good commercial base to work from. By sensib;le I mean not wasting Millions on the like of Mcculoch, Velicka, Lafferty, etc.

I hate seeing sky subscriptions being used in totaling amounts spent on Rangers. No offence.

I know what you mean, I had Sky anyway but some people must have subscribed just to watch Rangers. I think it's fair to add it as an expense for football fans of all teams.

I disagree. You subcribe as a customer of sky. Your subscription charge is payed to sky.

I know it does? I never said it didn't. However Sky pays the Leagues who the then pay the clubs alot of money for the rights.

Football clubs are heavily realient on our Sky Sports subscriptions and for many of us football is the main reason for subscribing, therfore it is fair to say that Sky Sports is part of the expense of following modern football.

Yes it's an expense in following football. But not in supporting Rangers.

[TunnyLoyal 1,136]

Yes it's an expense in following football. But not in supporting Rangers.

Nail on head.

[WilliamFyfe 1,438]

I currently have £7 in the bank,

[Gaz52 11,837]

I would give everything i have to support Rangers. I do that now anyway

[Boab 73]

I currently have £7 in the bank,

You'd be better taking it out the bank!

[FUDGIE52 9]

I could donate 50 empty lemonade bottles I have in the hut.

[TerryTibbs 224]

About 3 quid.

Im a mingin student

[diesel0412 1]

if it meant the club not going to the wall then i would give all my savings.

£12000.

wife would kill me tho

[broosthemoose 0]

I couldn't give a huge lump sum, simply because I don't have it.

I would happily commit to a monthly £25 or so though, and would do this indefinitely.

The article in the Herald, speculation though it was, mentioned £1000 payable over 5 years. That sounds good to me.

[thegregster 1]

Could prob manage £250 outright just now. But, also pay around £25-30 a month for ever.

So if yer reading this moonbeams the offers on the table.

PS I'll also chuck in a mars bar.

[WilliamFyfe 1,438]

I currently have £7 in the bank,

You'd be better taking it out the bank!

Interest mate give it time and that bad boy 7 quid will be a sweet ass tenner

[californiadreamin52 339]

Would have to see the details to see what my money was doing and not falling into the wrong hands

[Boab 73]

Dunno, maybe 2 grand. Maybe 1.

[BILLYSNOVO 5]

£400 plus a monthly DD of £25

[toolongawake 1,209]

£100

[cooper1989 0]

$20,000 Canadian Dollars. (That's approx 10K pounds). But we better be in control!

[ScottBF2 3,540]

£300

Saved ma wages!

[docspiderman 1,259]

Wouldn't give a penny towards some hair brained scheme to be wasted by egomaniacs who say they are representatives of the support, or to pay off a debt to a bank who encouraged debts to be built up.I have paid out enough over the years and especially the last few years of non entertainment where the passion has been more off the field than on it.