simon 1,758 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 no one bud,thats why i'm not arguing,i'm just stating that some dont see.i'm off from this thread incase i get put in pre-mod again for fuck all again. RM resident rouge lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted January 4, 2010 Author Share Posted January 4, 2010 G Herald says in about three reports that it was a goal and a refereeing error and The Scotsman's report says the same. If you watch the video Fortune's knocks McGregors arm away before he headers the ball. In actual fact the linesman flagged it. Fuck the Ghearld :clap: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iserdo 1 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 no one bud,thats why i'm not arguing,i'm just stating that some dont see.i'm off from this thread incase i get put in pre-mod again for fuck all again. RM resident rouge lol haha i was just trying to get my point across and i'm no rouge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaltersGotStyle 160 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 The gif in this topic clearly shows he knocks his arm! Therefore it was not allowed! 7 points clear!!!! 7 men out... and we still come out with a draw!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted January 4, 2010 Author Share Posted January 4, 2010 The gif in this topic clearly shows he knocks his arm! Therefore it was not allowed! 7 points clear!!!! 7 men out... and we still come out with a draw!!! Champion's, that's why! No Surrender! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaltersGotStyle 160 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 The gif in this topic clearly shows he knocks his arm! Therefore it was not allowed! 7 points clear!!!! 7 men out... and we still come out with a draw!!! Champion's, that's why! No Surrender! :21: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iserdo 1 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 The gif in this topic clearly shows he knocks his arm! Therefore it was not allowed! 7 points clear!!!! 7 men out... and we still come out with a draw!!! Champion's, that's why! No Surrender! well said Muff. (tu)that's what i said to my old man today. apart from i said(once we came from 1 nil down)that's what champions are made of. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goianegra 4,704 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 It's only a goal if the referee allows it :pierre: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted January 4, 2010 Author Share Posted January 4, 2010 It's only a goal if the referee allows it :pierre: Too many RM members moaning about it...why, fuck them, they mean fuck all! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iserdo 1 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 It's only a goal if the referee allows it :pierre: Too many RM members moaning about it...why, fuck them, they mean fuck all! because some are wanting to be offended,like the great unwashed! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brissybear 50 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 That would be given as a foul every day of the week. Anyone know how to upload a GIF to Facebook? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,288 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 The sad thing is that a lot of future historians refer back to newspapers and so if they all report it as a bad decision that is probably how it will be remembered Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 13,319 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Lol some of the comments are way over the top. We were lucky to get a point from today's game, and the disallowed goal could go either way. Lucky to get it disalowed. You're right, it could have gone either way, I just think too much protecion is given to keepers in general. Other than that, if spetic couldnt find the net more than we could no matter how much attacking play mthey showed, it had nothong to do with luck. Goal posts don't move. Yes but thats the point....perhaps too much protection is given to keepers....but that is consistent....hence why that conclusion is drawn. I still think it was a foul however - Fortune leads into the challenge with his arms. Had it been Boyd on Boruc I would have thought the same thing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
keithgersbear 3,225 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Yep. Clear foul. This isn't 1970 Fortune. He knocked his arm away just as he was getting ready to grab it. They have no one but themselves to blame. Far too many basic errors were made and they didn't punish us and put the game to bed. They scored late on but they got what they asked for with the corner. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,140 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Lol some of the comments are way over the top. We were lucky to get a point from today's game, and the disallowed goal could go either way. Lucky to get it disalowed. You're right, it could have gone either way, I just think too much protecion is given to keepers in general. Other than that, if spetic couldnt find the net more than we could no matter how much attacking play mthey showed, it had nothong to do with luck. Goal posts don't move. Yes but thats the point....perhaps too much protection is given to keepers....but that is consistent....hence why that conclusion is drawn. I still think it was a foul however - Fortune leads into the challenge with his arms. Had it been Boyd on Boruc I would have thought the same thing. Boyd got fouls given against him yesterday even when Caldwellinho was climbing all over him. It was never a goal, not with todays rules being what they are. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumshie 205 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I think it was a goal. If it was the other way round I'd be ragin. I also thought we got of jail as they created far more chances than we did but with 7 men out and a backs to the wall performance it makes it all the more sweeter Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 It was never a goal he clearly hits his arm. If fans of the filth think he didn't, good, get it right up the manky bastards...... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 110,567 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Lets be blatantly honest here. A Rangers side missing 6 almost certain starters and losing wee Nach after 10 mins or so, should have been put to the sword if this shower of mhanky bead rattling fucks were any good. How many shots did they have? I cant even answer that but while monkeyheid and his barca continue to fuck it up, the almighty Rangers needed only 1 attempt on target from Lee the midfield general and that was it. Point salvaged from the jaws of defeat. I know the dhims will be giving it the ususal conspiricay shite and to be honest dont you just fucking love it. THATS WHY WERE CHAMPIONS - WE SHALL NOT BE MOVED Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.0718467440b83501bd96fe13ccf520c7.jpg)
Recommended Posts