H72 265 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 48 hours. :lol:Stop plane around. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM1872 3,742 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 The idea that Whyte has to make a bid etc, with the involvement of the Stock Market is interesting as the SM have been reasonably quiet.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerwelly 115 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 F.F.S JUST GET IT DONE!!! :souness: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM1872 3,742 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 F.F.S JUST GET IT DONE!!! :souness:Holding people at gun point won't help proceedings my friend Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 so lloyds using technicalities and semantics again does twb do there pr. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orangeclement 572 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 now i won't pretend to have a head for this sort of thing BUT if LBG hold a 24% share of MIH and MIH have a percentage share of RFC then they must be on the board of MIH deciding if the offer is enough for their portion of the shares no ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 yes of course.they say things like the sale of rangers is upto rangers shareholders. conveniently not saying that that includes them in a big way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM1872 3,742 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 I really do think its coming to a head, I just wish I had a strong indication on which way its going to go. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orangeclement 572 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 Just checking So the bottom line is someone is lying whether it be SDM , CW or LBG now out of the 3 options 2 stand out SDM and LBG , one spent all our money the other is taking all our money , both are looking for MORE money ... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 so lloyds using technicalities and semantics again does twb do there pr.Or just telling the truth..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 no lloyds are saying there isnt an exit fee. but they arent saying what there is. its a million quid shortfall aparently. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueben_d 40 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 Just checking So the bottom line is someone is lying whether it be SDM , CW or LBG now out of the 3 options 2 stand out SDM and LBG , one spent all our money the other is taking all our money , both are looking for MORE money ...Not really, there is no 'exit' charge however due to the nature of our hedged payments a further 1M is due (if we waited for LIBOR to rise this wouldn't be the case) Though quite why this has caused a stooshy I don't know as it's fairly clear that the 1M should be considered part of the loan.The only disagreement I could think of is wether it's whyte or Murray who foots the bill. But seeing as they've allegedly agreed a fee this seems strange. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 Or just telling the truth..... lies of ommision are still lies.there at it. as they always are. when asked if muir worked for them they said things like mih pay his wages. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bear 25 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 no lloyds are saying there isnt an exit fee. but they arent saying what there is. its a million quid shortfall aparently.I’m thinking along those lines too mate, there will be some sort of issue with money cleverly disguised as something other than a get out clause?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
H72 265 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 I've no idea what's going on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orangeclement 572 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 Not really, there is no 'exit' charge however due to the nature of our hedged payments a further 1M is due (if we waited for LIBOR to rise this wouldn't be the case) Though quite why this has caused a stooshy I don't know as it's fairly clear that the 1M should be considered part of the loan.The only disagreement I could think of is wether it's whyte or Murray who foots the bill. But seeing as they've allegedly agreed a fee this seems strange. didn't mean the 'exit' charge was going more for they're not happy with the amount offered to MIH for the shares was my thinking, maybe trying to squeeze more out with the debt coming down etc etc so in essence they will still make a decent profit on the loan if you will as with Whyte paying less of the debt off then he has more candy for the other side of the deal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Laff's Dodgy Barnett 20 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 General cartman lee, do you actually want our club bought over ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWalterSmithLegend 206 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 My wife says she will sit by Mr McCoist, chew gum with him, carry his bags and wash the sweat from his socks and for free (and she knows the offside rule and can spot a decent player!).More useful than Durrant then! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 whyte clearly doesnt want to pay this fee. i would be surprised if he ever does. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 General cartman lee, do you actually want our club bought over ?of course not hes a murray and lloyds man. his bitching if we are about whyte will be epic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
disgruntled_bear 157 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 If SDM was that desperate to sell as he has been suggesting in the last few years, he would be doing all he could to push this deal through.As usual, he's no where to be seen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guardian 4,281 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 The fee must be relatively small beer. I can't see Whyte walking away over it.Ultimately one or other will give in or both will compromise and the deal will go through.Won't be long now guys Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 no lloyds are saying there isnt an exit fee. but they arent saying what there is. its a million quid shortfall aparently.apparently indeed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 General cartman lee, do you actually want our club bought over ?Not by Craig Whyte no.Sir davids time is up and we need a new owner, sadly we haven't found anyone suitable yet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted March 29, 2011 Share Posted March 29, 2011 Love the number of pages about nothing!Easy Impressed Loyal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts