gunslinger 270 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 now now gunslinger, we've argued before an apparently the 3 titles and the 3 years of reducing debt and costs were smiths magical working, it cant be the boards doing now maybe it was the banks man that done that you honestly believe the daily record, with their claims that prominent rangers fans with financial backgrounds AJ will get an apology if he is due one, but right now he is about as far away from an apology from the fans as SDM isi believe in my own eyes and i have see the form. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 now now gunslinger, we've argued before an apparently the 3 titles and the 3 years of reducing debt and costs were smiths magical working, it cant be the boards doing now maybe it was the banks man that done that you honestly believe the daily record, with their claims that prominent rangers fans with financial backgrounds AJ will get an apology if he is due one, but right now he is about as far away from an apology from the fans as SDM isand i have also told you aj gave smith his new deal to stay. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 so has whyte denied this today? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ibroxgers25 18 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 so has whyte denied this today?havent heard a thing from rangers on this at all today Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kplfishtank 4,657 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 i love it how all the doom and gloom merchants cant wait to put the bot into Rangers by taking the word of a guy who stole a Celtic strip design off a website and posted it in the paper only to realise it was drawn by a 15 year old who wanted it to be the strip. carry on guys im enjoying your love in with the papers Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 this form exists no matter who put it in the paper. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 havent heard a thing from rangers on this at all todaycheers perhaps torrows papers will have something. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLawMan 6,240 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 this form exists no matter who put it in the paper.The form exists. It's the interpretation of it though that leaves a lot of unanswered questions. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getstiffed 8,863 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 Are Rangers the only team who are doing this?Are there other clubs out there using the same business model? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 The form exists. It's the interpretation of it though that leaves a lot of unanswered questions.it sure does. which is why those dismissing it are being daft. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 109,117 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 anywhere else other than the DR even discussed this? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polo 1,433 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 this form exists no matter who put it in the paper.The form is a release of part of the Bank's security IIRC. How on earth can releasing part of the Bank's security be a bad thing? Serious question.Too many are jumping to the conclusion that a partial release means it's being freed up to be used as security elsewhere. That's not necessarily the case. If the Bank is no longer entitled to our season ticket revenue to secure any sums owed to it then that's a good thing IMO. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 anywhere else other than the DR even discussed this?doesn't look like it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 The form is a release of part of the Bank's security IIRC. How on earth can releasing part of the Bank's security be a bad thing? Serious question.Too many are jumping to the conclusion that a partial release means it's being freed up to be used as security elsewhere. That's not necessarily the case. If the Bank is no longer entitled to our season ticket revenue to secure any sums owed to it then that's a good thing IMO.that's one possibility. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polo 1,433 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 that's one possibility.No, that's a fact! The rest is speculation. thebooler 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 No, that's a fact! The rest is speculation.what's a fact. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 109,117 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 what's a fact.Something that is true bluepeter 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pastorjack 0 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 Interesting company. http://tinyurl.com/44dfwfb Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLawMan 6,240 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 Interesting company. http://tinyurl.com/44dfwfbAll right Spangles Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 Something that is trueor currently believed to be true. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLawMan 6,240 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 No, that's a fact! The rest is speculation.As i have said before. Its not a fact. Its YOUR interpretation. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 frankie says on gersnet hes heard whyte is yet to secure the 5 million for signings this summer so we wont be spending. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 As i have said before. Its not a fact. Its YOUR interpretation. thats what i thought. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfc1nosurrender 55 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 "I understand that Keith Jackson has been banned from Ibrox.The Daily Record has been asked to publish a full apology for the 'Coisty Cash Crisis' story which appeared today.The new regime is sending out a message that untrue stories about the club will no longer be tolerated."Grandmaster Suck from FF Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eastcoastbear 122 Posted June 14, 2011 Share Posted June 14, 2011 Just read somewhere else that Keith Jackson has been banned from Ibrox and the Record have been asked to publish an apology for this "story". Changed days! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.