CanadianBacon 2,088 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Watched it five or six times, really can't see how anyone can argue.Just seems odd that the SPL are so quick to use the fast track system for Rangers yet take four months to get Loovens a ban for something ten times more malicious.Disgraceful haste used here.The SPL are under the watchful eye of Nonce FC (as are the SFA - Lieswell is in situ there now) and it's now open season on any and all Rangers-related incidents.For anyone on here who truly believes that this will herald an open and fair hearing system and that everything is now on a level playing field they are living in cloud cuckoo land.I sincerely hope the club appeal this all the way - and continue to appeal it - all the way to the European Courts of Justice.That's exactly what that shower of manky bastards will do when the shoe is on the other foot. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintbob1969 1,473 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Actually when watching it I get the feeling he is being held and just tries to shake the guy off, clumsy, and it does hit him in the face, but the player himself had no issue with it and no-one had an issue at the time other than the prissy pansies in the press box.I'd take a one match automatic ban but more than that is decidedly unfair. Naisy is not a dirty player, not by a long shot. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon 1,743 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Different season different rules that's why.Hooper on Jennings....again i am harping on about this incident but the same circumstances and only one is referred to the video review panel...WHY?Who knows why, it doesn't make sense. We have to accept the ban though, he is guilty. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Different season different rules that's why.Hooper on Jennings....again i am harping on about this incident but the same circumstances and only one is referred to the video review panel...WHY?Hooper was booked? I thought the compliance officer was only used when the ref misses the incident. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Jela 20,405 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Aye No Surrender eh...just take the shafting with dignified silence as per usual.OK, how do you think we should go about appealing a 2 match ban to someone who deserves it ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamMunny 3,242 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Take it now and we'll have him back for after the international break. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennis 1,011 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 My only problem is, that Hooper wasn't treated the same way. Which is shocking. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianBacon 2,088 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 OK, how do you think we should go about appealing a 2 match ban to someone who deserves it ?Are you saying he deserves a two-match ban? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Jela 20,405 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Are you saying he deserves a two-match ban?Absolutely. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MayboleLoyal_atb 3,731 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Hopper got booked a think.As for this it was a stupit thing to do and it seems a fair punishment! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennis 1,011 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Ill be hoping he tells the SFA to go and take a fuck to them selfs when asked to play in the remaining Qualification games. If he's banned for the SPl the he should be banned for the SFA. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alfajerk 23 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 why wasn't it a penalty to Rangers if it was in the box Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianBacon 2,088 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Absolutely.Frightening.A Rangers player gets crucified by a Taig-filled media and your reaction is to agree with them when they and the SPL make an example of him?I look forward to your viewpoint when (if ever) this TV evidence is used from here on in and a Nonce FC player is involved. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bombaybadboy08 15,660 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 This should be the way that offenders are punished in the future,no matter who they play for.I wouldn't know where to start trying to defend something so blatant. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Jela 20,405 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Frightening.A Rangers player gets crucified by a Taig-filled media and your reaction is to agree with them when they and the SPL make an example of him?I look forward to your viewpoint when (if ever) this TV evidence is used from here on in and a Nonce FC player is involved.Not frightening at all. The media, on this occasion, are right, he's been caught with video evidence, you can see it on video, he has no case. My viewpoint would be the same if it was as blatant as Naismith's. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 You can't go around elbowing cunts in the coupon and expect to get away with it. Some cunts on here check under their bed for Catholic plots. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaiser1041 9,088 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 This should now be how these incidents are handled fast and no confusion. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennis 1,011 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Not frightening at all. The media, on this occasion, are right, he's been caught with video evidence, you can see it on video, he has no case. My viewpoint would be the same if it was as blatant as Naismith's.What like the Hooper incident Vs M'well. The same incident that had barely a mention in the press or various sports channels. What do you make of that? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Jela 20,405 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 You can't go around elbowing cunts in the coupon and expect to get away with it. Some cunts on here check under their bed for Catholic plots. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Jela 20,405 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 What like the Hooper incident Vs M'well. The same incident that had barely a mention in the press or various sports channels. What do you make of that?Was he booked by the ref for it ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Disgraceful haste used here.The SPL are under the watchful eye of Nonce FC (as are the SFA - Lieswell is in situ there now) and it's now open season on any and all Rangers-related incidents.For anyone on here who truly believes that this will herald an open and fair hearing system and that everything is now on a level playing field they are living in cloud cuckoo land.I sincerely hope the club appeal this all the way - and continue to appeal it - all the way to the European Courts of Justice.That's exactly what that shower of manky bastards will do when the shoe is on the other foot. This is a load of nonsense. We go on about Celtic and their conspiracy theories, constant protesting etc yet you want us to do the same?We only have a right do complain about them if we don't go to the same level ourselves, and thankfully it seems the club is accepting the ban. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennis 1,011 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 You can't go around elbowing cunts in the coupon and expect to get away with it. Some cunts on here check under their bed for Catholic plots.What about Gary Hooper incident. Is thayt fair game as well. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 What about Gary Hooper incident. Is thayt fair game as well.edit - he wasn't booked. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianBacon 2,088 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Not frightening at all. The media, on this occasion, are right, he's been caught with video evidence, you can see it on video, he has no case. My viewpoint would be the same if it was as blatant as Naismith's.No dubiety in your eyes? His manager defended the player. His club captain, Davie Weir, defended the player on TV at the weekend stating he was merely trying to unshackle himself from the defenders grip (albeit blindly). The defender himself made no meal of it during or after the game - but when the Rangers-hating media (prompted by the e-mailing Taigs out there no doubt) start the campaign, McCoist's, Weir's or the Dunfermline players opinions are of no consequence?Of course he has a fucking case - and I sincerely hope the club appeal this to the enth degree. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennis 1,011 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Was he booked by the ref for it ?No, and celtc also scored from the incident. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.