bluebloodbear 13 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 and if its not true ?You can continue posting shite, although it must be getting difficult with your tongue so far up Whyte's arse. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCutch 4,340 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 So, and this sticks in my craw, has AJ been right all along?It's looking more and more like it to me mate.Still hate the cunt though for the way he creamed money off us. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCDBigBear 10,829 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 It's looking more and more like it to me mate.Still hate the cunt though for the way he creamed money off us. If it is AJ you still hate, he didn't take money off us. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 and if its not true ?last fanboy standing Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCDBigBear 10,829 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 and if its not true ?If it isn't true, Whyte could sue the Mail. I still think the points about finding out the truth and what happened to the £24m are valid. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GMac 1,405 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 Looks like a soft landing job the more I read it. If politicians are about to announce bad news they leak it to the press a couple of days early, softens the shock value when the full facts are revealed. Either Ticketus or the administrators have briefed the Mail. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sergio 1,199 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 The Money has got to be secured on something other than Rangers. Ticketus would have known that our coat was on a Shoogle nail with the EBT. Not like it's a secret, It will all come out this week. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trueblue72 8 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 Still can't quite get my head round it..Assuming its true, can anyone explain the repercussions?Who would be worse off here - Rangers, Whyte, or the ticket agency?Surely they wouldn't have put themselves into a situation where they are left with £24m of useless tickets ??? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel Mustard 380 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 Still can't quite get my head round it..Assuming its true, can anyone explain the repercussions?Who would be worse off here - Rangers, Whyte, or the ticket agency?Surely they wouldn't have put themselves into a situation where they are left with £24m of useless tickets ???It would serve them right for trying to buy £24m worth of Rangers tickets, from someone who didn't even have a caur ticket. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redmond7 1,021 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 Still can't quite get my head round it..Assuming its true, can anyone explain the repercussions?Who would be worse off here - Rangers, Whyte, or the ticket agency?Surely they wouldn't have put themselves into a situation where they are left with £24m of useless tickets ???Well I suspect two of those three will survive in some shape or other, and I suspect one will have to run as far and fast as they can. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
doubledangler 2 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 How the hell would anyone give someone £24 million on the security..."Well I might own Rangers next week" well was Phil betts a director of that company ticketus ?sure a read it somewhere. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 358 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 If it's proven to be true then it explains precisely why AJ has requested investigations on behalf of the old board of directors because it would be illegal for both Whyte AND the previous directors if they had been involved in it, but everything points to AJ and co' not being involved in Whyte's ticket deal so they need to clear their names of the illegal activity as well as bring the whole deal under serious scrutiny and proper investigation. It's so serious that our previous directors (if they had been involved) could face not only bans as directors, but jail time. So, AJ calling for the investigations isn't purely for the good of the club, it's also for his own benefit and the benefit of other previous directors of our board. I'm sure none of them fancy doing time in the klink along with Craig Whyte. Another couple of aspects of it and actually the most important aspects if it's proven to be true, are that any securities or guarantees (like tickets for example) given in connection with the illegal act would most likely be void and unenforceable. On top of that, the share purchase agreement between Whyte and Murray for the takeover of the club would also most likely be void. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nvager 498 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 If it's proven to be true then it explains precisely why AJ has requested investigations on behalf of the old board of directors because it would be illegal for both Whyte AND the previous directors if they had been involved in it, but everything points to AJ and co' not being involved in Whyte's ticket deal so they need to clear their names of the illegal activity as well as bring the whole deal under serious scrutiny and proper investigation. It's so serious that our previous directors (if they had been involved) could face not only bans as directors, but jail time. So, AJ calling for the investigations isn't purely for the good of the club, it's also for his own benefit and the benefit of other previous directors of our board. I'm sure none of them fancy doing time in the klink along with Craig Whyte. Another couple of aspects of it and actually the most important aspects if it's proven to be true, are that any securities or guarantees (like tickets for example) given in connection with the illegal act would most likely be void and unenforceable. On top of that, the share purchase agreement between Whyte and Murray for the takeover of the club would also most likely be void.I hope all of them end up in Jail and Ticketus has no security and the administrators can sell RFC to a completely NEW owner and management team. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weird_Beard 99 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 well was Phil betts a director of that company ticketus ?sure a read it somewhere.Phil Betts wasn't a driector of Ticketus.Where did you read it? What did it say? Was it just one wee line that he was a director of ticketus? Nice first post Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marmalade1872 40 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 say it one more time the motherwell billionare didnt have a pot to pish in hes a fuckin conman and so far were his biggest scalp Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weird_Beard 99 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 I hope all of them end up in Jail and Ticketus has no security and the administrators can sell RFC to a completely NEW owner and management team.Ticketus doesn't have any security with Rangers assets. A new owner would be just the ticket. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
californiadreamin52 339 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 Conformation of what we already know so much for Whyte`s master plan yet some people will continue to defend the wee charlatan. No way back now Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chesh 28 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 I started off last monday morning backing Whyte to get us through this mess and as time has gone on with every day and every new peice of information I can't stand the guy and want him away from the club as fast as possible! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Monk 3,208 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 Sorry don't want to read through 15 pages, can someone sum up what's happened. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raligt 2,541 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 Sorry don't want to read through 15 pages, can someone sum up what's happened.According to the Daily Fail Whyte has paid the debt off using future season ticket sales before he even owned Rangers and then done a runner. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Monk 3,208 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 According to the Daily Fail Whyte has paid the debt off using future season ticket sales before he even owned Rangers and then done a runner.Cheers Think we should have a new owner within the next few months. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 I hope all of them end up in Jail and Ticketus has no security and the administrators can sell RFC to a completely NEW owner and management team.This would be a good outcome. Rangers is the only thing that matters. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pastra 38 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 Ticketus doesn't have any security with Rangers assets. A new owner would be just the ticket.That would seem unlikely tbh, the worry is what has Whyte secured the money against? I am worried it has been secured against a club asset.Hopefully not but I am sorry to say I just cant see Whyte placing the risk on his shoulders. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVB 2,560 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 If by fanboy you imply I am a Whyte fan you couldn't be further from the truthGood stuff. However, I wasn't actually meaning you.........hence the use of the words " I am.......". Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StudsLonniegan 9 Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 This would be a good outcome. Rangers is the only thing that matters.Some although I am sure they do realise what they are doing, allegedly think that by attacking the owner they are not attacking the club, strange mindset. Why do the taigs work for them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.