Ricky_ 893 Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 Chris McLaughlin @BBCchrismclaug#SPL have investigated claims that #Celtic may have had side contract with Juninho but say there is no case to answer. hopefullu we'll get an explanation for that one then from these corrupt cunts. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilko89 507 Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 I'm assuming Donald Findlay carried out said investigation? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipedown27ready 108 Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 YAWN!I really don't give a fuck about that club. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
R.J. MacReady 226 Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 Precedent set thenNo case for them to answer, no case for us too answer either. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangersxfc 265 Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 YAWN!I really don't give a fuck about that club.well its that club that wants to take our titles away ffs Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
77amurai 258 Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 shocker Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ger_onimo 20,488 Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 Chris McLaughlin @BBCchrismclaug#SPL have investigated claims that #Celtic may have had side contract with Juninho but say there is no case to answer. hopefullu we'll get an explanation for that one then from these corrupt cunts.Blimey, that was quick! Investigation:Regan: "Petey, sorry to ask, but there wasn't any funny business with Jun..."Lawell: "DID I TELL YOU TO STOP SUCKING?"Regan: "Sorry Pete."Investigation concluded. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipedown27ready 108 Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 What do you expect? Have you not learned that the SPL and Celtic work together by now? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senna 735 Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 Shite. Utter shite.Predictable, utter shite. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gillete 1,338 Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 well its that club that wants to take our titles away ffsExactlySick of people moaning about things like that Bears den ? Blah fucking blahIf you don't like it then fuck off into another thread Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54andcounting 627 Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 What about the EBTs then? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
centenarystand 2,227 Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 Chris McLaughlin @BBCchrismclaug#SPL have investigated claims that #Celtic may have had side contract with Juninho but say there is no case to answer. hopefullu we'll get an explanation for that one then from these corrupt cunts.Translated into the Queens English and that reads The SPL is totally corrupt and frankly we dont care who knows. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueoutthedome 87 Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 Fuck that was quick. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFarmer 260 Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 It wasn't a side contract or a dual contract, it was a loan. Hence the name.Same as ours. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricky_ 893 Posted September 12, 2012 Author Share Posted September 12, 2012 It wasn't a side contract or a dual contract, it was a loan. Hence the name.Same as ours.the difference is, they are saying - we have a case to answer, and a hearing.but in repsonse to charlies comemtns on monday morning - they've taken a day and decided nobody else... has a case to answer. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricky_ 893 Posted September 12, 2012 Author Share Posted September 12, 2012 YAWN!I really don't give a fuck about that club.why open the thread then? title wasn't clear enough? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Carpintero 546 Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 One rule for us, another rule for Celtic. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tooblue 105 Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 So would this mean their whole case against us now rests upon whether or not side letters existed? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kirkiebear 1,013 Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 Chris McLaughlin @BBCchrismclaug#Celtic source tells me they are satisfied they acted appropriately in Juninho case. They did use EBT but they say all above board.From that I can have a good guess that the SPL`S "investigation" went as far as asking Celtic if they done anything dodgy, them saying no, and that was satisfactory enough for the SPL? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54rfc 2 Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 Don't know if this is interesting to anyone or not, just wondering what they have apparetly done differently...?!http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/mobile/football/19577683The Scottish Premier League have investigated Celtic's use of an employee benefit trust and say they are satisfied that no rules were breached.The league concluded the scheme was legal and above board.BBC Scotland understands the case relates to the Brazilian player, Juninho Paulista.Meanwhile, the SPL have called for anyone with proof of other clubs using the EBT schemes inappropriately to provide evidence.EBTs typically involve an employer depositing money in a trust, which is paid out to beneficiaries in the form of tax-free loans but such payments should not be made on a contractual basis, as it would make them part of an employee's salary and subject to tax and National Insurance.An independent commission, appointed by the SPL, will in November begin a hearing into Rangers' alleged use of dual contracts during the period (2001-2010) they used EBTs for players.The inquiry will seek to determine whether the club broke rules over disclosure of payments to players.Rangers were relaunched by a new company earlier this year after the previous incarnation could not be saved from liquidation.However, the Ibrox side had their bid to take over the SPL share previously owned by Rangers rejected and the club was instead placed in Scottish Division Three.And, after announcing Rangers would not take part in the independent commission's initial meeting on Tuesday, the club's chief executive Charles Green claimed "more than two" clubs had used EBTs.An SPL spokesman responded: "The Scottish Premier League notes the recent statement by Charles Green suggesting that a number of other clubs may have used EBTs."If anyone has any evidence that any SPL Rule has been broken by any club in relation to the use of EBTs, they should pass that evidence to the SPL or to the Scottish FA so that their claims may be investigated."Separately, we have seen reports regarding an EBT in relation to a former player of Celtic FC. The SPL has investigated the arrangements and documentation in that case and has determined that there is no evidence of any breach of SPL Rules. The SPL has therefore decided that no further action should be taken." Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverBlue_Since91 2,895 Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 YAWN!I really don't give a fuck about that club.YAWN! No one asked if you cared. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrongbowLoyal. 36 Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 Ah the old "Celtic Side Contract" Does not matter.... Wonder which made up rule/rules they will say covers the one they used... Corrupt Fucking Bastards!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MayboleLoyal_atb 3,764 Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 Celtic lawyers say they done nothing wrong? There's a shock Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverBlue_Since91 2,895 Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 It's about time we get people involved to investigate these cases who do not have any interest in Rangers or Celtic. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
beerbelly 31 Posted September 12, 2012 Share Posted September 12, 2012 so according to SPLgood ETB = not listed in accounts, not disclosing it, getting fined by taxman because of it and having to then also pay the tax on it + fine, then STILL dont declare it, but have YOUR CLUB's lawyers investigate if you done wrong on something they most likely also advised you on.bad ETB = declare on every years accounts, have a senile old cunt with axe to grind claim used wrongly even though he was not on board during times ETBs used, have biggest rivals lawyers investigate if anything done wrong.SPL corrupt to the core Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.