Turnberry18 3,204 Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Ever since football has tried its hand at business, rather unsuccessfully, these things have grown in spades: fans interested in owners and balance sheets etc. It's all nonsense. If it's not Rangers playing at Ibrox, then who is it? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teamgers 1,214 Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 The easiest and most understandable fact, ( well, maybe not to the filth ) and this is just one of many, is this.........Rangers, the club, was bought by Charles Green's consortium BEFORE the old company that ran Rangers were liqiudated, it may have been easier for them to argue, if say, no one had came in and saved us and the gates were padlocked etc etc, but this simply did not happen and as i stated we were bought over BEFORE liquidation took place so it's essentially the club changing ownership from one company to another with no loss of history! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turnberry18 3,204 Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 The easiest and most understandable fact, ( well, maybe not to the filth ) and this is just one of many, is this.........Rangers, the club, was bought by Charles Green's consortium BEFORE the old company that ran Rangers were liqiudated, it may have been easier for them to argue, if say, no one had came in and saved us and the gates were padlocked etc etc, but this simply did not happen and as i stated we were bought over BEFORE liquidation took place so it's essentially the club changing ownership from one company to another with no loss of history!You dignify all this too much with your eloquence. We should relax about this whole thing. You know it's Rangers, I know it's Rangers, and anyone who thinks it's not Rangers is living in lala land. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Itsablueworld 42 Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 I don't understand why the club dont just take one person to court for liable.That cunt Cosgrove would seem the prime candidate.It's almost like these wanks are calling Charlie's bluff.Can't understand why we cant do(legally)those cunts on RC and RS.Bring back SOUNESS.No fucking joke by the way.Imagine that prick Spiers facing Souness! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Itsablueworld 42 Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 that was meant lible not liable as in me begini liable cup pregtive vex wha dos myt fuck nuts in. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turnberry18 3,204 Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 that was meant lible not liable as in me begini liable cup pregtive vex wha dos myt fuck nuts in.Or even Libel Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverBlue_Since91 2,895 Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 I don't understand why the club dont just take one person to court for liable.That cunt Cosgrove would seem the prime candidate.It's almost like these wanks are calling Charlie's bluff.Can't understand why we cant do(legally)those cunts on RC and RS.Bring back SOUNESS.No fucking joke by the way.Imagine that prick Spiers facing Souness!Maybe Charles Green thinks there a waste of space and there is more important things going on at Rangers just now to worry about these no marks.Once everything is sorted out behind the scenes though and we know what league we're in i think something should be done about them.There is still to much going on with, trying to get a new team for next season not knowing what league we will be in and needing new scouts etc..... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cushynumber 25,178 Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 The retards are actually doing us a favour, when the ASA confirm our status and our history they'll have to accept it.This. Spot on. Given the weight of evidence in our favour, why do the haters not see the hole they are digging for themselves here?I poster previously re th his idea....its like two 15 year olds came up with the idea in there bedroom. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWTC 2,279 Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 This'll end up crackin ammo for bears, if we needed more. Laughable. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johanhentze 14,339 Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 Unbelievable bitterness.. This wouldn't happen in ANY other country.. My friends from back home are actually in tears over this.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaffbear 4,107 Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 Jesus, what will they try next? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skelf 1,153 Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 The Drum owned byCarnyx Group Limited, Mercat Building, 4th Floor, 26 Gallowgate, Glasgow, G1 5ABGallowgate. Surprise surprise Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skelf 1,153 Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 I don't think there's a Rangers man alive that would say we are not the same club. Casey ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 Casey ?No I'm Edmiston Drive, think you have miss sent bud Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 that was meant lible not liable as in me begini liable cup pregtive vex wha dos myt fuck nuts in.Oh.I see now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 The easiest and most understandable fact, ( well, maybe not to the filth ) and this is just one of many, is this.........Rangers, the club, was bought by Charles Green's consortium BEFORE the old company that ran Rangers were liqiudated, it may have been easier for them to argue, if say, no one had came in and saved us and the gates were padlocked etc etc, but this simply did not happen and as i stated we were bought over BEFORE liquidation took place so it's essentially the club changing ownership from one company to another with no loss of history!Indeed, that phrase may be premature. The liquidation process takes some time.It should be... BEFORE the old company that ran Rangers were placed into the liquidation process. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 Jesus, what will they try next?Prayer? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teamgers 1,214 Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 Indeed, that phrase may be premature. The liquidation process takes some time.It should be...BEFORE the old company that ran Rangers were placed into the liquidation process.Thanks mate, your absolutely correct of course, maybe i should have thought through the wording with more precision! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 Thanks mate, your absolutely correct of course, maybe i should have thought through the wording with more precision!It's no biggy.You were more accurate than 95%+ of media reports. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Dan Ey 48 Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 Here here Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mason boyne 40 Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 surley our own complaints to ASA and any other governing body that their o'irishness is false and that they were formed as a scottish football club. FACT Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonCables 11 Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 Who gives a toss about what 62 nuggets say? We know the truth and this investigation will confirm it.Bit silly letting JT release that statement when the man referred to us a new club leas than a year ago. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mick1271 533 Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 Enquiries into common knowledge, and making complaints about common knowledge, typical thick micksCould you please use the terms ....mhanks , Tims or scummy bastards . I find the use of the term "thick mick " insulting ,and I will be contacting Focus as soon as I can be arsed Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBagalag 726 Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 The retards are actually doing us a favour, when the ASA confirm our status and our history they'll have to accept it.Doesn't matter what the ASA confirm, the mutants at the girodome will still be spouting their 'Sevco' and 'Sevconian' shite. Must be a bastard living in the shadow of Scotland's most successful club, unlike that mob, we are proud of our history. As many have said before, it's been nice being paedo free in division three. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
coop troop 106 Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 Rangers; Most Successful Club in Scotland.Septic, they are southern oirlunds most successful club at sweeping bheast behaviour under the carpet.Fixed that for you Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.