Hamie 4,936 Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 the fact it's in three parts makes me think it's just taken in context,pick out certain parts of whole discussion that can be pieced together to create a different view of what's actually happened,just highlight what you want people to hear for your own gain.you could pretty much alter any conversation recorded by only selecting parts that can be misconstrued to your advantage and shyte is just the slimy wee toad to do itits in 3 parts cause The Sun wants to milk it for all its worth. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 Sigh - it matters not a jot because administration failed and green led an asset buy out - no shares are bought from old co - it matters not a jot what was said during admin as green did not go down that route at all. here is my take on this ( and sfa / spl / all and sundry ) Rangers have no debt.Rangers have a whack if cashRangers have a lot of assets (Ibrox- Auchehowie).Whyte / spl/ sfa etc. are shameless in trying to tap into Rangers cash . if it helps divide the support even better but lets see if we can dip into the well! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Forever 179 Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 Sigh - it matters not a jot because administration failed and green led an asset buy out - no shares are bought from old co - it matters not a jot what was said during admin as green did not go down that route at all.here is my take on this ( and sfa / spl / all and sundry )Rangers have no debt.Rangers have a whack if cashRangers have a lot of assets (Ibrox- Auchehowie).Whyte / spl/ sfa etc. are shameless in trying to tap into Rangers cash . if it helps divide the support even better but lets see if we can dip into the well!I think this is the first time I have ever agreed with one of your posts. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
daviecooper01 826 Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 the fact it's in three parts makes me think it's just taken in context,pick out certain parts of whole discussion that can be pieced together to create a different view of what's actually happened,just highlight what you want people to hear for your own gain.you could pretty much alter any conversation recorded by only selecting parts that can be misconstrued to your advantage and shyte is just the slimy wee toad to do itCorrect - first was a brief snippet to fill a headlineRemaining two may be slightly longer, but as this was being done all based on a CVA, and obviously no CVA happened, Whyte is just being Whyte.Everyone calm down... Green may be many things but he is NOT stupid - do you really think he is cahoots with Whyte and thinks he could get away with it - based on Whyte's record, and the feelings of the fans over the past 18 months?Calm down. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creampuff 22,630 Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 WHO'S PULLING THE STRINGS?! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ritchieshearercaldow 22,393 Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 I presume this tape was handed over by Whyte, why anyone would take this man's word for anything amazes meIt could be Green explaining his plan for Sevco and how it would workGreen was not part of the club so the "you" just refers to the new company not Whyte k Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 Key point here.This is from the time when we were going for a CVA as made clear in the tape.At that point, Whyte's shares were of value. His debt (to HMRC), and his alone, meant we couldn't get that CVA.Once HMRC said no to CVA, Whyte was irrelevant.This is really weak stuff for something supposedly explosive. I wonder how wrong the Idicracy can spin it, however. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverBlue_Since91 2,895 Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 If the tapes show Green in a bad light, will he sack him self like Sandaza?He can be sacked by the board members ie Walter smith...... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimgers 565 Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 Who gives a f@ck, the tears are now running down the scales on that Chameleon Whyte. Green out-kidded the kidder and fisted the wee runt right up the pooper. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,268 Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 WHO'S PULLING THE STRINGS?!Charlie chan Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joker69 60 Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 Whyte is nothing and does not matter , who cares if Green buttered him up he was attempting to get his shares.In the end those shares were not needed.So does any of this really matter?There is a concerted campaign within the media and elsewhere to destabilse the club , the support and to discredit GreenPlease stop buying into this Bears Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scarkev 3,540 Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 Key point here.This is from the time when we were going for a CVA as made clear in the tape.At that point, Whyte's shares were of value. His debt (to HMRC), and his alone, meant we couldn't get that CVA.Once HMRC said no to CVA, Whyte was irrelevant.This is really weak stuff for something supposedly explosive. I wonder how wrong the Idicracy can spin it, however.Mate this is exactly it, whyte was needed at the CVA stage because his shares were required and that's why green and Kennedy sought to keep him sweet.....The problem is this story like all the other ones we have faced recently merely destabilise us further because many rangers fans will buy into it, whilst the orcs salivate over it!Anyone with any doubts about this should maybe question the timing....he has had these tapes for nearly a year why is this story just coming out now? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IbroxBurnzy 484 Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 when green came in we all said he was a ruthless businessman who gets what he wants - what's changed?Absolutely nothing mate that's what makes our Hysteria even more puzzling?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam2102 665 Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 Absolutely nothing mate that's what makes our Hysteria even more puzzling??Glad I'm not the only one who sees this.People need to think, if it was Walter Smith who lied to get the club would we be annoyed? I don't think this gives us enough reason to distrust a man. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel Walter E. Kurtz 19 Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 Absolutely nothing mate that's what makes our Hysteria even more puzzling??Exactly, I'm no rushing in to anythin here myself, wait and see what developes should be the attitude, nothing has changed although I'll be intrestded in what Green has to say. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwhiteandblue 3,330 Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 Not doubting you. but how certain are you of this? Can't get the Sun website to load (uni wifi). It doesn't sound like they were in it together?I know CW is a liar but I'm still worried.from what I just heard, Green has went to hero status in my opinion. He has whyte believing he is sevco, it was sevco scotland that bought us, so whyte is on to plumbs. Who says ye cannae con a conman? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 Mate this is exactly it, whyte was needed at the CVA stage because his shares were required and that's why green and Kennedy sought to keep him sweet.....The problem is this story like all the other ones we have faced recently merely destabilise us further because many rangers fans will buy into it, whilst the orcs salivate over it!Anyone with any doubts about this should maybe question the timing....he has had these tapes for nearly a year why is this story just coming out now?Timing is such a huge aspect as you say.Whyte has loads of issues financially and psychologically. He may be doing this for attention, a deluded belief of what he's due, an attempt to get any cash he might be offered or even as a threat of a counter case to get BDO off his back.None of it makes sense, unless you factor in Whyte's personality. At the same time, the usual elements of the media will surely give it undue focus ably assisted by the armies of amateur accountants, lawyers and liewells. They have had some sustained success in getting lies to influence more irrelevant factors. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,624 Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 Would make my day if Whyte had got duped by Green. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 I think this is the first time I have ever agreed with one of your posts.I think the favoured expression is even a broken clock is right twice a day !! but we all agree we want the best for rangers and others don't Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
better than all the rest 153 Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 http://local.stv.tv/glasgow/220306-craig-whyte-plans-legal-action-to-claim-back-rangers-ownership/he has nothing to gain by this, and why have the police not locked him up for fraud. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mason boyne 40 Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 the fact it's in three parts makes me think it's just taken in context,pick out certain parts of whole discussion that can be pieced together to create a different view of what's actually happened,just highlight what you want people to hear for your own gain.you could pretty much alter any conversation recorded by only selecting parts that can be misconstrued to your advantage and shyte is just the slimy wee toad to do itYour spot on mate, he has had a year to doctor the tapes Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef 436 Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 jaunCharles, to say that you had to con your way to gt your hands on Rangers does you and my club a disservice, please resign today another obsessed taig bastardtaig. Yea admin an accusation but ban this bear.RM (bluenight/taig loyal) Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CalvinC 1,414 Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 CG says the word Sevco about 7 times. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcb 1,167 Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 Tape 2 now available.Imran Ahmed to Craig Whyte "consider us your reps on the board"Make of it what you will ?. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunny_01 2,007 Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 Well done Charles Green conning this Shyster...... Anyone who wanted to own Rangers, would needed his shares so who cares....... fk off Whyte Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.