A LOYALIST Rangers supporters group has said fans have been "badly let down" by the Dave King-led board

[Then_now_forever 19]

If she could have   gotten away with adding death group after Loyalist she would have .

 

[Virtuoso 27,180]

3 hours ago, Rfc52 said:

They are loyalists and describe themselves as that. What's the issue?

This ^^^

From their homepage:

Quote

Established in 2007, Vanguard Bears are a group of Loyalist & Unionist Rangers supporters, whose aims are to ensure that the good standing and unionist tradition of THE quintessential British Club is maintained, and to support the Protestant Unionist Loyalist community in Scotland, Ulster and beyond. Our motto "Defending Our Traditions" refers to this.

http://www.vanguardbears.co.uk/about/

[Then_now_forever 19]

1 minute ago, With Heart and Hand said:

shell be pleased that wee poofs like you have got offended at nothing

You know me  , do you ?

 

[backup 4,724]

2 minutes ago, With Heart and Hand said:

so shes trying to construe things so people falsely believe that VBs are loyalists?

[SheriffHood 540]

Loyalist and proud and have absolutely no shame in admitting it.

[ElBufalo20 7,908]

14 minutes ago, backup said:

In what context was it used ?

It was obviously used in a sensationalist journalistic way to appeal and confront outsiders. 

Im not caring either way but I think that's what people are trying to get at.

[Then_now_forever 19]

Quislings 

 

 

[backup 4,724]

Just now, Sasa'onlyPLGsuccess'Papac said:

It was obviously used in a sensationalist journalistic way to appeal and confront outsiders. 

Im not caring either way but I think that's what people are trying to get at.

I will leave it with you, facts are facts.

[nemisis 358]

'mon the Loyalists

[backup 4,724]

9 minutes ago, backup said:

Humour all of us proud Loyalists dim or otherwise, who take no offence at being called Loyalists, go on spell it out 

 

4 minutes ago, Then_now_forever said:

Quislings 

 

 

How is the spelling it out coming along, should we wait 

[.Williamson. 82,533]

9 minutes ago, Then_now_forever said:

If she could have   gotten away with adding death group after Loyalist she would have .

 

Give over 

[With Heart and Hand 8,949]

9 minutes ago, Then_now_forever said:

If she could have   gotten away with adding death group after Loyalist she would have .

 

they do support a dead club so that would also be correct

[ElBufalo20 7,908]

6 minutes ago, backup said:

I will leave it with you, facts are facts.

I never said they weren't loyalists. 

[backup 4,724]

Just now, Sasa'onlyPLGsuccess'Papac said:

I never said they weren't loyalists. 

No one said you did, so you now agree the headline is factually correct without people putting their imagination into overdrive.

[ElBufalo20 7,908]

Just now, backup said:

No one said you did, so you now agree the headline is factually correct without people putting their imagination into overdrive.

No im saying that they could've used Rangers fan group and then used Loyalist in the story if they wanted.

But used it as a headline to grab the attention of the easily offended.

[With Heart and Hand 8,949]

2 minutes ago, Sasa'onlyPLGsuccess'Papac said:

No im saying that they could've used Rangers fan group and then used Loyalist in the story if they wanted.

But used it as a headline to grab the attention of the easily offended.

this. It was a fishing expedition and a successful one at that

they did it to grab attention and it worked.

But that doesn't mean its offensive or something to get wound up about

[backup 4,724]

3 minutes ago, Sasa'onlyPLGsuccess'Papac said:

No im saying that they could've used Rangers fan group and then used Loyalist in the story if they wanted.

But used it as a headline to grab the attention of the easily offended.

So the headline whither you like it or not is factually correct, don't see any offended posts from VB the subject matter.

[CoopsLaud 4,186]

Would rather get behind vb,ub and followrangers than c1872 and this board any day of the week. I never refer to myself as a loyalist but wouldnt be bothered in the least if others chose to refer to me as such.

[Gman36 3,456]

12 minutes ago, backup said:

So the headline whither you like it or not is factually correct, don't see any offended posts from VB the subject matter.

You're needing your hole or something 

[backup 4,724]

20 minutes ago, Gman36 said:

You're needing your hole or something 

Happy with the one I have thanks, you on the other hand appear to be spoilt for choice with two 

[K.A.I 36,183]

Hmm all Rangers supporters groups are Loyalist/Unionist to one extent or another. Don't see the issue.

I'm actually in the minority that I'm glad they are reporting on it. We need media to pick up on these statements to increase pressure and alert the wankers in charge of the true feelings of the support.

All for it. 

National next please.

[Malvern 11,329]

Somebody getting upset about us being called Loyalist in headlines?

Fuck sake we are not going all snowflake are we? Next we will be bringing down the photo of the queen and banning troops to the stadium to cover up the taint of being who the hell we are (no there is no taint it was used as poetic license).

[Gaffbear 4,096]

More loyalists the better 

[OnwardsandUpwards 834]

With K.A.I on this one.Hope every news outlet possible picks it up.More pressure brought to bare on our current custodians the better as far as I am concerned.Got to muck it as uncomfortable for these fuckers as possible.

[thebooler 4,509]

As a VB I'm more than happy to be described in this way. Fuck them, and fuck their shitey wee rhag.

It's aboot time Ibrox got back to being a Loyalist ground full of Loyalist Supporters, supporting a team full of Loyalists (I'll make exception for the foreigners as they're a different type of pape).

We need to take our club back - no more being conned by a 5 year fan.