Blue Nosed Babe 21,031 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 Hire Me, Problem Solved. Bears r us 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hadron Collider 31,419 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 1 minute ago, coopsleftboot said: I'm not against petitions per-se. Maybe a petition to scrap the process could be more pointed? All I think this does is shoot the messenger. The next in post will face exactly the same dilemma..."which Rangers incident that's been sent to me do I refer to the panel?" Maybe I just get frustrated with the scatter-gun approach aimed at every "target" that's wronged us knowing fine well that things like this just get ignored. In this case, I don't even think it's her fault; certainly not when she'll be bombarded by umpteen media outlets pointing fingers at Rangers incidents only, with the odd smattering of others and a token tim one now and again. I don't understand the whole process but if that's the gist of how it works (and she's not allowed to go looking for incidents herself) then it's hardly surprising that, with our media's leanings, we get the brunt of it. I've tried my bit with the BBC before and it's so fucking frustrating and demoralising you end up letting it drift. What it really needs is major fans groups (I know they try) and the club putting weight behind things. It's that arena where the scum leave us trailing behind....they've managed to get the press and the authorities so much onside I struggle to see where we can make an in-road. I know what you’re saying mate, but if she has any fucking idea and backbone, she should be questioning the way some of the calls are treated. She’s the puppet no doubt, but fucksakes anyone with honour would see this is a fucked system. Then again, she’s been installed by people who have no honour. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
theiconicman 3,023 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 The Compliance Officer is a prime example of being careful what power you give as it can be turned against you. It was a good idea to give the opportunity for when a Ref fucks up to have it evaluated, but its turned into the Court of Public Opinion, and therefore against us. cascadeshrimp and eejay the dj 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOAT 30,449 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 Genuinely thought that said Craig whyte at first and thought it was 2012 all over again. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 31,000 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 22 minutes ago, Blue Nosed Babe said: Hire Me, Problem Solved. If only we could. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
terry739 267 Posted February 15, 2019 Author Share Posted February 15, 2019 5 hours ago, Dan Deacon said: Pile of shite anyway but OP's lack of a link makes this even worse. My apologies....but it's the first time I've started a post and never even thought about doing that! Your well constructed reply will certainly make me think next time! eejay the dj 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 It's simples The beggars believe the refs have a biased towards us for last 100 years So first chance they get with refs strike and subsequent anarchy .Creating the perfect authority to ultimately cancel out any favouritism towards us And now it seems taking it to a new level Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 20 minutes ago, terry739 said: My apologies....but it's the first time I've started a post and never even thought about doing that! Your well constructed reply will certainly make me think next time! 😂 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 2 hours ago, Blue Nosed Babe said: Hire Me, Problem Solved. Why have you super powers ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steelydan1690 20,228 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 2 hours ago, Blue Nosed Babe said: Hire Me, Problem Solved. What’s the rate ?a d what’s ur solution? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Nosed Babe 21,031 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, Steelydan1690 said: What’s the rate ?a d what’s ur solution? Cleaning the entire process up, greater transparency, explaining decisions and I am not a celtic fan.... That do for a start? Bears r us and Steelydan1690 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Nosed Babe 21,031 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 5 minutes ago, eejay the dj said: Why have you super powers ? I am not a celtic fan. Carling1873 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mus 1,398 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 Just reading some of the post's in the comments page of the petition, and somebody has stated that since she took over as the compliance officer celtic have never been citied, is this correct as that is a hell of a stat! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 4 minutes ago, Blue Nosed Babe said: I am not a celtic fan. Like everyone of the compliance officers so far .Yeah I'd have you 😉 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corky True Legend 2,682 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 I thought that Club 1872 were going to sort everything out. Or maybe they are waitimg for Dingwall to appear as the representative of the Rangers' fans. After all, we know the board will do fuck all to stand up for us. eejay the dj 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bordersbear 1,105 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 39 minutes ago, eejay the dj said: It's simples The beggars believe the refs have a biased towards us for last 100 years So first chance they get with refs strike and subsequent anarchy .Creating the perfect authority to ultimately cancel out any favouritism towards us And now it seems taking it to a new level It's have a bias Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 54,341 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 1 hour ago, eejay the dj said: It's simples The beggars believe the refs have a biased towards us for last 100 years So first chance they get with refs strike and subsequent anarchy .Creating the perfect authority to ultimately cancel out any favouritism towards us And now it seems taking it to a new level Mate you're insinuating a club's actions in forcing strike action by refs has resulted in subsequent turn around in fortunes with disciplinary matters then largely going in the scums favour........ If only stats supported that 😉👇👍 Fair Play Table Stats 2010/2011 season we finished 2nd, scum were 6th. Compliance Officer Vincent Lunny starts in the new role October 2011 2011/2012 season we were 2nd bottom with more than double the scum yellow cards. Since then the scum have finished top other than 2 seasons when they finished 2nd. This season they're on 22 yellows, less than 1 per game. The rest of the league ranges from 40 to 55 yellows. NB From when I could find fair play records started until the end of the season prior to the compliance officer introduction, the scum averaged 3rd place in the table. eejay the dj and Robmc1 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 54,341 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 47 minutes ago, mus said: Just reading some of the post's in the comments page of the petition, and somebody has stated that since she took over as the compliance officer celtic have never been citied, is this correct as that is a hell of a stat! Since she started? Since the compliance role was introduced they've had players cited for racism and inappropriate singing, NOT for on field incidents during play. And see my post above for fair play stats too. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 54,341 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 51 minutes ago, Blue Nosed Babe said: Cleaning the entire process up, greater transparency, explaining decisions and I am not a celtic fan.... That do for a start? Not happening unless you start going to Sunday mass. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tannerall 25,935 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 I'm starting a petition asking Claire Whyte to explain the offside rule. (Seriously, there's not a lot of info on this woman, no pictures. Found two newspaper reports on her appointment, she only has experience of "grass roots football" apparently, whatever that is. So what exactly are her qualifications and experience ? ) Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmgers2 48 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 5 minutes ago, tannerall said: I'm starting a petition asking Claire Whyte to explain the offside rule. (Seriously, there's not a lot of info on this woman, no pictures. Found two newspaper reports on her appointment, she only has experience of "grass roots football" apparently, whatever that is. So what exactly are her qualifications and experience ? ) she is a catholic and a celtic fan so that's the only reason this bitch got the job. chapman and eejay the dj 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 1 hour ago, bordersbear said: It's have a bias Ok Magnus Gonzalez? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 1 hour ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: Since she started? Since the compliance role was introduced they've had players who are nobodies cited for racism and inappropriate singing, NOT for on field incidents during play. SeparateEntityMyArse 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 1 hour ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: Mate you're insinuating a club's actions in forcing strike action by refs has resulted in subsequent turn around in fortunes with disciplinary matters then largely going in the scums favour........ If only stats supported that 😉👇👍 Fair Play Table Stats 2010/2011 season we finished 2nd, scum were 6th. Compliance Officer Vincent Lunny starts in the new role October 2011 2011/2012 season we were 2nd bottom with more than double the scum yellow cards. Since then the scum have finished top other than 2 seasons when they finished 2nd. This season they're on 22 yellows, less than 1 per game. The rest of the league ranges from 40 to 55 yellows. NB From when I could find fair play records started until the end of the season prior to the compliance officer introduction, the scum averaged 3rd place in the table. That is superb research mate . I'm sure a few tits will have a dig . I think most bears will appreciate that find Incredible though SeparateEntityMyArse and Bears r us 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howsitgoing 4,281 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 The previous compliance officer was employed to bring charges against the use of EBT’s this new one is to remove football clubs being implicated in covering up child abuse. They’re legal experts not football ones for that very reason. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.