Jump to content

Club statement | Resolution not deemed competent


OceanRain

Recommended Posts

Be good if the SMSM who have started challenging the script getting handed out from the Girodome (like Tom Irish) could take just a little step farther and ask why null and void represents the financial abyss that everyone keeps saying it is.

This lie was started by Liewell (might even have mentioned the old “reaper cushions”:lol:) which is no surprise but it gets trotted out daily as if it were gospel and it’s just made up shite.

Not once has anyone looked into it or challenged it so it’s now accepted as fact.

League stops now, no champions, no relegation. European places based on current positions as is prize money. Scum go for NIAR next season, whenever that is.

There will be a rebate due to BT Sport for monies prepaid for games not played but that is manageable and, crucially, is the same where we null/void or crown the scum as champions. Financially, the cost is the same.

This “null and void equals financial Armageddon” lie needs to be stopped.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 27.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
6 minutes ago, Colin Traive said:

Be good if the SMSM who have started challenging the script getting handed out from the Girodome (like Tom Irish) could take just a little step farther and ask why null and void represents the financial abyss that everyone keeps saying it is.

This lie was started by Liewell (might even have mentioned the old “reaper cushions”:lol:) which is no surprise but it gets trotted out daily as if it were gospel and it’s just made up shite.

Not once has anyone looked into it or challenged it so it’s now accepted as fact.

League stops now, no champions, no relegation. European places based on current positions as is prize money. Scum go for NIAR next season, whenever that is.

There will be a rebate due to BT Sport for monies prepaid for games not played but that is manageable and, crucially, is the same where we null/void or crown the scum as champions. Financially, the cost is the same.

This “null and void equals financial Armageddon” lie needs to be stopped.

Would love to hear the explanation too mate. It makes no sense and isn’t backed up by any facts. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reading a few articles today which brought up an anomaly from what was perceived to be the case re reconstruction of leagues.

It appears that a qualified resolution (90% vote required from premier league, 75% from championship, 75% from L1/L2 combined) is applicable to certain rules including the rule that there are 42 members in the league. So this rule applies if we change from 42 members.

An ordinary resolution (75% vote from the 3 categories) applies for the majority of rules including the one which states the breakdown is 12/10/10/10 and there being 4 leagues.

So if the task force want to restructure bringing in new clubs they require a qualified resolution. Importantly if it's a restructure of the existing number of clubs (42), ie 14/14/14 theres less votes needed to secure this resolution. 

Very important distinction which I hadnt previously been aware of but which could have huge bearing on what happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Colin Traive said:

Be good if the SMSM who have started challenging the script getting handed out from the Girodome (like Tom Irish) could take just a little step farther and ask why null and void represents the financial abyss that everyone keeps saying it is.

This lie was started by Liewell (might even have mentioned the old “reaper cushions”:lol:) which is no surprise but it gets trotted out daily as if it were gospel and it’s just made up shite.

Not once has anyone looked into it or challenged it so it’s now accepted as fact.

League stops now, no champions, no relegation. European places based on current positions as is prize money. Scum go for NIAR next season, whenever that is.

There will be a rebate due to BT Sport for monies prepaid for games not played but that is manageable and, crucially, is the same where we null/void or crown the scum as champions. Financially, the cost is the same.

This “null and void equals financial Armageddon” lie needs to be stopped.

Spot on.

Why does it differ from terminating the proposed way with PPG given the number of games played doesnt change? What is the contractual issue, the cost, to whom and why?

Are these factual or assumptions? 

It seems "it's just because" has been accepted by all concerned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ritchieshearercaldow said:

Don’t know if it’s been raised before but this is an excellent point.

Imagine if the filth were still in the CL 😂

 

Quite right too.

How can we be expected to turnaround a 3-1 deficit without Jon Flanagan, Andy Halliday and Ojo!

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Redwhiteandblue said:

Why are we even still talking about this league? Its completely irrelevant now. 

Sorry let’s all get back to sitting in the house listening to the fucking depressing news. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 26 September 2024 16:45 Until 18:45
      0  
      Malmo FF v Rangers
      Swedbank Stadion
      UEFA Europa League

×
×
  • Create New...