Club statement | Resolution not deemed competent

[Hadron Collider 30,883]

2 minutes ago, HG5 said:

They’d better have plenty of dry powder now!

Fucking right mate. Now is the time to strike. I’m hoping our boys were waiting for this. 🇬🇧👍

[TEFTONG 60,108]

Do they really think they can sweep this away. 

Ok Rangers time to go public. 

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,723]

Is Deloitte not a brand under which other companies operate? Sounds like a stitch up.

[Brian Fantana 28,894]

23 minutes ago, gazza27 said:

 

And just like that, the SPFL are closing off all the questions while the board sit on their arse.

 

We don't need an independent investigation to expose them unless we have nothing but hearsay which is what it looks like. 

 

if we had anything and we released it then that would trigger an independent investigation, that's the leverage. Any supporters groups who have the clubs best interests at heart should request that members stall on ST renewals until the board release  what they have instead of just blindly following the rhetoric.

[Hadron Collider 30,883]

1 minute ago, TEFTONG said:

Do they really think they can sweep this away. 

Ok Rangers time to go public. 

We expected this tbf. Mon Rangers. Hammer these cunts now!  

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,723]

3 minutes ago, bluebell.scot said:

Football is going to be a different game after this all thats for sure.

Agreed.

But our ST money wont be going to stadium expansions etc until we're on a more stable footing, that's for sure.

[LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,510]

I really feel for the people that didn't see this coming.

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,723]

1 minute ago, Brian Fantana said:

And just like that, the SPFL are closing off all the questions while the board sit on their arse.

 

We don't need an independent investigation to expose them unless we have nothing but hearsay which is what it looks like. 

 

if we had anything and we released it then that would trigger an independent investigation, that's the leverage. Any supporters groups who have the clubs best interests at heart should request that members stall on ST renewals until the board release  what they have instead of just blindly following the rhetoric.

Away to fuck.

[Howsitgoing 4,281]

1: Dundee vote about 16:50 approx

2: SPFL publish votes 17:15 approx

3:Dundee ask for vote not yet received to be dismissed.  17:30 approx 

4:SPFL find vote in quarantine system at 20:30 according to dellotti 

And they think their internal investigation clears it all up. 

[Hadron Collider 30,883]

Every supporters association should be all over this and nail these fuckers. Not just Rangers. We know the taigs won’t support it. 

[Hadron Collider 30,883]

2 minutes ago, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said:

I really feel for the people that didn't see this coming.

Who would that be mate? 😉

[Robmc1 4,741]

7 minutes ago, Hadron Collider said:

They’re shitting themselves. They went and did an inquiry on their own?  Why do an inquiry if you felt you were above board. Cunts are living in a different dimension. 

Did their enquiry even speak to Rangers re the evidence held of wrongdoing, thought not... Now they can head back to their secret 2 year enquiry in the East End. Seriously though, was this announced or actually carried out behind closed doors?

[Dickie1963 2,352]

6 minutes ago, Howsitgoing said:

1: Dundee vote about 16:50 approx

2: SPFL publish votes 17:15 approx

3:Dundee ask for vote not yet received to be dismissed.  17:30 approx 

4:SPFL find vote in quarantine system at 20:30 according to dellotti 

And they think their internal investigation clears it all up. 

What did they make of the whistleblowers evidence?

 

[Hadron Collider 30,883]

Just now, Robmc1 said:

Did their enquiry even speak to Rangers re the evidence held of wrongdoing, thought not... Now they can head back to their secret 2 year enquiry in the East End. Seriously though, was this announced or actually carried out behind closed doors?

Same shite different day mate. 

[Howsitgoing 4,281]

Just now, Dickie1963 said:

What did they make of the whistleblowers evidence?

 

Exactly. That’s just one part of the major fuck up by Pete. 

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,723]

Deloitte report confirms that Dundee email was received into the spfl quarantined inbox at 1648.

So the spfl did receive it, just not into their inbox. Does the company act state it must be an inbox? Nope.

Deloitte doing a great job providing proof of wrongdoing as stated by Seniir Counsel previously.

[bluebell.scot 74]

10 minutes ago, Brian Fantana said:

And just like that, the SPFL are closing off all the questions while the board sit on their arse.

 

We don't need an independent investigation to expose them unless we have nothing but hearsay which is what it looks like. 

 

if we had anything and we released it then that would trigger an independent investigation, that's the leverage. Any supporters groups who have the clubs best interests at heart should request that members stall on ST renewals until the board release  what they have instead of just blindly following the rhetoric.

Would rather we lobbied the club to reject away tickets before that.

[Robmc1 4,741]

1 minute ago, Hadron Collider said:

Same shite different day mate. 

No joking, but in a way this does seem like an act of desperation to me which indicates the potential that they maybe actually caught with their trousers down over this one. Ball is now in the boards court, really hope we have something credible to discredit them...

[bluenoz 30,837]

They have really fast-tracked this internal investigation. No mention of a call to Aberdeen at 4:40. No mention of other clubs being bullied or not. No mention of Dundee's actual vote at 4:52 that submitted NO.

I hope Rangers evidence is enough not only to sue the spfl but Deloitte as well for such a flimsy report.

[Hadron Collider 30,883]

My statement earlier mate. Why do an inquiry if you thought you were above board?  They’re fucking worried. Time for us to drop the bomb. 

[bluebell.scot 74]

4 minutes ago, Hadron Collider said:

My statement earlier mate. Why do an inquiry if you thought you were above board?  They’re fucking worried. Time for us to drop the bomb. 

Hoping we have one!

[murzo 7,446]

12 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

Deloitte report confirms that Dundee email was received into the spfl quarantined inbox at 1648.

So the spfl did receive it, just not into their inbox. Does the company act state it must be an inbox? Nope.

Deloitte doing a great job providing proof of wrongdoing as stated by Seniir Counsel previously.

"I hope that Scottish football will now focus on the significant issues that face our game, otherwise many clubs may not survive this period.

McCluskey wanting this swept away and move on, again with the “clubs might not survive if we don’t” pish. Same as the vote, vote this through or you’ll no get your money, and clubs might not survive.

[Drumloyal 14,967]

6 minutes ago, bluenoz said:

They have really fast-tracked this internal investigation. No mention of a call to Aberdeen at 4:40. No mention of other clubs being bullied or not. No mention of Dundee's actual vote at 4:52 that submitted NO.

I hope Rangers evidence is enough not only to sue the spfl but Deloitte as well for such a flimsy report.

Been keeping away from this these last few days but did Dundee actually state they sent it at 4:52pm? 

If so, how did it arrive at the spfl inbox at 4:48pm?

Did Marty Mcfly send it?

[Dave Hedgehog 10,673]

2 minutes ago, murzo said:

"I hope that Scottish football will now focus on the significant issues that face our game, otherwise many clubs may not survive this period.

McCluskey wanting this swept away and move on, again with the clubs might not survive if we don’t pish. 

The very people that wanted to deliberately hold back clubs own money unless they done as they were told now worried clubs might not survive.

Irony overload.

[Dickie1963 2,352]

15 minutes ago, bluenoz said:

They have really fast-tracked this internal investigation. No mention of a call to Aberdeen at 4:40. No mention of other clubs being bullied or not. No mention of Dundee's actual vote at 4:52 that submitted NO.

I hope Rangers evidence is enough not only to sue the spfl but Deloitte as well for such a flimsy report.

I have audited contracts

1. It depends on Terms of Reference. What have you actually been asked to investigate. 

2. What evidence have you been presented with.

3. For instance they havent been presented with whistleblower evidence.

4. Or it seems presented Rangers with their Whistleblower policy which would likely prevent those implicated from finding out who the whistleblower is. Ie proper independence required.

5. An issue I have is how the terms of the vote was written. You can change a No but not a Yes. So you in actual fact have the full 28 says to bully and coerce or in fact bribe someone to change their vote. This is not a fair or reasonable way to form a vote.

6. An issue I have in general is that Dundee said they would wait and see what they could get with leverage. What did they get ? Has anyone asked. It potentially swung a £30mn place in Champions League. Certainly how a large amount of money could potentially be distributed.

7. Lastly. It's very difficult to prove the difference between wrong doing and incompetence.