Jump to content

C*ltc


Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, ForeverAndEver said:

Agreed, but nothing wrong happened with the Forrest thing. They got a free kick which was the right decision

The handling of it was poor. It was all a little confusing. And whilst it was a foul on Forrest, prior to that Middleton didn't foul Bauer. The ref pretty much got everything wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, ForeverAndEver said:

Agreed, but nothing wrong happened with the Forrest thing. They got a free kick which was the right decision

But poorly communicated by the ref, leading Hibs to think the ball was coming back to them

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, fanaticCR said:

Tarriers supporters association writing to the SFA :lol:

https://twitter.com/celtic_now/status/1178650610125680641?s=19

Written in green crayola by cloven hoof - how very clever 🙄 I honestly believe #55 will be the death of the deranged lunatic:

Brilliant reply from @TheLawMan  

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Virtuoso said:

Written in green crayola by cloven hoof - how very clever 🙄 I honestly believe #55 will be the death of the deranged lunatic:

Brilliant reply from @TheLawMan  

 

They don't care for facts. Just get enough lies out there often enough to become facts 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ForeverAndEver said:

You’re as daft as the ones complaining about our penalties mate, all definitely penalties

in your apologetic little opinion . I swear you would probably say the bheasts weren't guilty of child abuse

You an odd little guy

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, eejay the dj said:

in your apologetic little opinion . I swear you would probably say the bheasts weren't guilty of child abuse

You an odd little guy

They were penalties, but Ntcham should have been off and their free kick before the goal was a farce. 

The fact that they were pens just makes it better. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, eejay the dj said:

That cheating little bastard dived at the first and the second was more a coming together

the wee pape with the smashed face left his left trailing at the first dive,and was 100% a correct call,and the second was as you said,a coming together with minimal contact.
You can bet if that first claim was against them,you can bet Clancy would have had his windows panned in on Sunday night.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, scottyscott1963 said:

the wee pape with the smashed face left his left trailing at the first dive,and was 100% a correct call,and the second was as you said,a coming together with minimal contact.
You can bet if that first claim was against them,you can bet Clancy would have had his windows panned in on Sunday night.

Thank fuck someone seen it like I did mate . So we are now both conspiracy theorists :p:

How any bear can say there first is a pen astounds me , when we have seen twenty of these not given for Rangers . Alfredo alone must be on about 10 over last few years .

It will be the same people saying our next stonewall penalty , wasn't a penalty " lets be honest " they will say

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

Thank fuck someone seen it like I did mate . So we are now both conspiracy theorists :p:

How any bear can say there first is a pen astounds me , when we have seen twenty of these not given for Rangers . Alfredo alone must be on about 10 over last few years .

It will be the same people saying our next stonewall penalty , wasn't a penalty " lets be honest " they will say

Both pundits on bbc Scotland 'highlights' agreed ntcham wasn't a sending off :rofl: 
the same 2 cunts that thought Daniel Candies shoulda been sent off for blowing kisses to a cunt who assaulted him while having him in a headlock.
Maybe it's the real reason I watch it,to see how many fuck ups 2 tossers can make.
Why would I believe anything any cunt from the bbc mumbles when trying to be impartial.
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, scottyscott1963 said:

Both pundits on bbc Scotland 'highlights' agreed ntcham wasn't a sending off :rofl: 
the same 2 cunts that thought Daniel Candies shoulda been sent off for blowing kisses to a cunt who assaulted him while having him in a headlock.
Maybe it's the real reason I watch it,to see how many fuck ups 2 tossers can make.
Why would I believe anything any cunt from the bbc mumbles when trying to be impartial.
 

The sad thing is mate . It will the same numpties on here that also say he shouldn't have been sent off .

I honestly wonder about what kind of so called fans we have on here .

Some of my other team supporting mates can even see the clear bias in Scotland highlights . it is rhancid in it's favouritism towards the bheasts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 03 October 2024 19:00 Until 21:00
      0  
      Rangers v Lyon
      Ibrox Stadium
      UEFA Europa League

×
×
  • Create New...