UPDATE: Rangers accept Morelos 3 match ban

[They Gnu 11,553]

18 hours ago, Almacger said:

Here’s your answer:

 

I like to see him macheted then fed to seagulls

 

just joking about the sea gulls

[Lord Lockin 3,913]

Think a lot of people are missing the point regarding the Buff suspension, first of all it wasn't a stamp, yes he stood on his leg, but he didn't stamp on him, was it intentional only the Buff knows that. What's angering me is we all heard Jack Ross and Darren McGregor say the ref saw it and he thought it was a tangle of legs, so we know the ref's now lying because why would Ross and McGregor lie. I think everyone agrees McGregor should have been cited as well, why he wasn't brings me to the real issue here the Buff is being treated differently than any other player in Scottish football and has been for most of his career in Scotland, this is my grievance about the club, I can't remember once them coming out and highlighting this. 

Between on and off the park the treatment Morelos has had to endure has been ridicules.

On a final note these assaults went unpunished - judge for yourselves  - is he getting treated differently  

 

[16BlueSherbert90 19,224]

17 hours ago, G.E.C. said:

Had a look at our next three fixtures and tbh I can see why we didn’t appeal. Itten, Defoe and Roofe should be enough to see off St Johnstone, Hamilton and Killie.

 

Yeah, not worried at all. We have plenty players who can keep this lot on their toes.

Gutted for Morelos cause he's great when on form, not just as a striker now neither ....but it is what it is. Don't think opposition should be getting off lightly for their dirty mishaps though. Rangers should 100% question this and take the SFA to task for allowing it to continue. 

Unfortunately they don't and is still an ongoing bugbear. 

[They Gnu 11,553]

12 hours ago, Redemption80 said:

Not particularly bothered, it was a clear red and while the double standards are annoying I really couldn't care less if Mcgregor is still playing for Hibs or not. 

I may have thought differently a year ago, but Roofe is back from injury and I want to see more of Itten so trying to look at the positives. 

Annoying, Furfuxsake stubbing your toe is annoying, this is corruption. One player slaughtered by two cunts on sky then fast track punished and banned for three games, another guilty of an almost identical challenge, basically ignored by aforementioned cunts and goes without retrospective punishment. Aye it’s annoying.

[Howsitgoing 4,281]

9 minutes ago, Lord Lockin said:

Think a lot of people are missing the point regarding the Buff suspension, first of all it wasn't a stamp, yes he stood on his leg, but he didn't stamp on him, was it intentional only the Buff knows that. What's angering me is we all heard Jack Ross and Darren McGregor say the ref saw it and he thought it was a tangle of legs, so we know the ref's now lying because why would Ross and McGregor lie. I think everyone agrees McGregor should have been cited as well, why he wasn't brings me to the real issue here the Buff is being treated differently than any other player in Scottish football and has been for most of his career in Scotland, this is my grievance about the club, I can't remember once them coming out and highlighting this. 

Between on and off the park the treatment Morelos has had to endure has been ridicules.

On a final note these assaults went unpunished - judge for yourselves  - is he getting treated differently  

 

Thought the same as you that it wasn’t a stamp but our club has looked at it and decided that it was.  

They acknowledge the inconsistency though which is a separate issue. 

[Arrowtown Pie 133]

6 minutes ago, They Gnu said:

Annoying, Furfuxsake stubbing your toe is annoying, this is corruption. One player slaughtered by two cunts on sky then fast track punished and banned for three games, another guilty of an almost identical challenge, basically ignored by aforementioned cunts and goes without retrospective punishment. Aye it’s annoying.

This.

If there wasn't the media faux outrage from the usual suspects at Buffs every reaction or incident (whilst blithely ignoring similar incidents involving other players) this would never have reached the CO. 

[Mr Soprano 13,964]

12 hours ago, Redemption80 said:

Not particularly bothered, it was a clear red and while the double standards are annoying I really couldn't care less if Mcgregor is still playing for Hibs or not. 

I may have thought differently a year ago, but Roofe is back from injury and I want to see more of Itten so trying to look at the positives. 

It’s not really about McGregor playing for Hibs though, is it?

It’s about how Rangers and our players are seemingly refereed differently to the rest of the league.

On what planet, does the fact offices that deal with retrospective punishments close during a holiday, meaning certain offences aren’t dealt with, have any place in the operations of top flight football in any country?

That’s not even the first or only instance either. It’s a fucking shambles, and Rangers really should have made some sort of statement similar to what I posted in another thread. Otherwise, the status quo will in fact continue.

[IRed 209]

22 minutes ago, pollok-bear said:

Hi bud. Does the media in France ever cover anything about rangers? Would love to know if other country's can see the double standards in Scottish football.

Not very much to not say absolutely not. 

If you're really fond of a foreign club you have to document by yourself, on the forums, on the papers, on UK TV (I have access to all that with internet and IPTV). Sometimes you have some journalists talking about Scottish Football on twitter but It's very rare and often when the Old Firm is programed.

I don't follow myself any French club because I can't relate since I was born, PSG doesn't recall me anything, French medias talk about them, Marseille and Lyon, mostly. English Premier League Football is the most covered here. 

So I can tell you Morelos case didn't have any article in France.

[Mr Soprano 13,964]

28 minutes ago, IRed said:

Not very much to not say absolutely not. 

If you're really fond of a foreign club you have to document by yourself, on the forums, on the papers, on UK TV (I have access to all that with internet and IPTV). Sometimes you have some journalists talking about Scottish Football on twitter but It's very rare and often when the Old Firm is programed.

I don't follow myself any French club because I can't relate since I was born, PSG doesn't recall me anything, French medias talk about them, Marseille and Lyon, mostly. English Premier League Football is the most covered here. 

So I can tell you Morelos case didn't have any article in France.

 ffs

[ger4life_1872 29,586]

 

[tannerall 25,935]

 

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,802]

57 minutes ago, Howsitgoing said:

Thought the same as you that it wasn’t a stamp but our club has looked at it and decided that it was.  

They acknowledge the inconsistency though which is a separate issue. 

The club would have weighed up the chances of getting him off the charge against the risks and consequences of taking it on and losing.

Just because we accepted the charge doesn't mean the club believe it to be a stamp. It doesn't even need to be a stamp anyways. Its likely more that we know the way the process works and we'd be fighting a losing battle with this one. I think they're right on this occasion.

[IRed 209]

22 minutes ago, Mr Soprano said:

 ffs

What did I say ?

[Howsitgoing 4,281]

8 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

The club would have weighed up the chances of getting him off the charge against the risks and consequences of taking it on and losing.

Just because we accepted the charge doesn't mean the club believe it to be a stamp. It doesn't even need to be a stamp anyways. Its likely more that we know the way the process works and we'd be fighting a losing battle with this one. I think they're right on this occasion.

I definitely don’t think it’s a stamp but the fact that he has been charged with violent conduct seems to support that. Anyway onwards and upwards, keeping it low-keyed is the right thing to do and continue the battle behind doors.  

[Lord Lockin 3,913]

1 hour ago, Howsitgoing said:

Thought the same as you that it wasn’t a stamp but our club has looked at it and decided that it was.  

They acknowledge the inconsistency though which is a separate issue. 

This is the point I'm making about the way Morelos gets treated - you say the club acknowledge the inconsistency - so why have they never challenged it - spineless 

[RFCRobertson 11,789]

6 minutes ago, Lord Lockin said:

This is the point I'm making about the way Morelos gets treated - you say the club acknowledge the inconsistency - so why have they never challenged it - spineless 

Because last time they challenged it Gerrard got cited and fined remember. It's simply not worth getting into atm when its such a vital part of the season. 
 

Just accept the ban, comment on the inconsistency and move onto bigger matters

[Howsitgoing 4,281]

5 minutes ago, Lord Lockin said:

This is the point I'm making about the way Morelos gets treated - you say the club acknowledge the inconsistency - so why have they never challenged it - spineless 

The latest Gerrard interview covers this he also acknowledged that it’s been going on for years.

[Bad Robot 21,288]

1 hour ago, Lord Lockin said:

Think a lot of people are missing the point regarding the Buff suspension, first of all it wasn't a stamp, yes he stood on his leg, but he didn't stamp on him, was it intentional only the Buff knows that. What's angering me is we all heard Jack Ross and Darren McGregor say the ref saw it and he thought it was a tangle of legs, so we know the ref's now lying because why would Ross and McGregor lie. I think everyone agrees McGregor should have been cited as well, why he wasn't brings me to the real issue here the Buff is being treated differently than any other player in Scottish football and has been for most of his career in Scotland, this is my grievance about the club, I can't remember once them coming out and highlighting this. 

Between on and off the park the treatment Morelos has had to endure has been ridicules.

On a final note these assaults went unpunished - judge for yourselves  - is he getting treated differently  

 

I still don’t get where the lie is as the ref said he only seen a tangle of legs on his first viewing of the incident.

Some time later he gets to see the video replays from all the angles and at that point he probably holds hid hands up to the CO and says he did miss it.

This prick of a ref is the last person I want to defend but I’m only doing it because I know if he did see Alfie’s studs come down on the leg of lamb then there’s nothing surer, Alfie would have been a straight red. You need to admit this about this ref as cunts like him dont need second chances to do our club harm.

[magic8ball 27,901]

1 minute ago, Bad Robot said:

I still don’t get where the lie is as the ref said he only seen a tangle of legs on his first viewing of the incident.

Some time later he gets to see the video replays from all the angles and at that point he probably holds hid hands up to the CO and says he did miss it.

This prick of a ref is the last person I want to defend but I’m only doing it because I know if he did see Alfie’s studs come down on the leg of lamb then there’s nothing surer, Alfie would have been a straight red. You need to admit this about this ref as cunts like him dont need second chances to do our club harm.

He’s also exposed himself as a poor referee .

[Lord Lockin 3,913]

4 minutes ago, Howsitgoing said:

The latest Gerrard interview covers this he also acknowledged that it’s been going on for years.

aye just heard the interview and hopeful the club will finally challenge it 

[Lord Lockin 3,913]

7 minutes ago, RFCRobertson said:

Because last time they challenged it Gerrard got cited and fined remember. It's simply not worth getting into atm when its such a vital part of the season. 
 

Just accept the ban, comment on the inconsistency and move onto bigger matters

Is that not what I did

[AlCapone 7,678]

14 hours ago, Redemption80 said:

Not particularly bothered, it was a clear red and while the double standards are annoying I really couldn't care less if Mcgregor is still playing for Hibs or not. 

I may have thought differently a year ago, but Roofe is back from injury and I want to see more of Itten so trying to look at the positives. 

Well you should care, whilst the league has all  but been won we have next seasons league to be won and it’s crucial that we are treated the same as our rival. Do not give an inch in losing any competitive advantage 

[AlCapone 7,678]

31 minutes ago, RFCRobertson said:

Because last time they challenged it Gerrard got cited and fined remember. It's simply not worth getting into atm when its such a vital part of the season. 
 

Just accept the ban, comment on the inconsistency and move onto bigger matters

This is a big matter and must be fought from a position of strength.  If our manger is pulled up after TLB comments last month there will be an explosion of anger. Fight the bastards

[The Specky Forum Organiser 65,030]

1 hour ago, IRed said:

Not very much to not say absolutely not. 

If you're really fond of a foreign club you have to document by yourself, on the forums, on the papers, on UK TV (I have access to all that with internet and IPTV). Sometimes you have some journalists talking about Scottish Football on twitter but It's very rare and often when the Old Firm is programed.

I don't follow myself any French club because I can't relate since I was born, PSG doesn't recall me anything, French medias talk about them, Marseille and Lyon, mostly. English Premier League Football is the most covered here. 

So I can tell you Morelos case didn't have any article in France.

What does that mean?

[Bad Robot 21,288]

33 minutes ago, magic8ball said:

He’s also exposed himself as a poor referee .

100%