Boab 73 Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 "As for Aaron, we've tried a few players on the left but he's probably the most natural for that position. "I can understand people saying 'Give him a go'. But we don't want to throw Aaron in at the moment when points are so vital - it would be unfair on him. "If we were winning the championship or leading games 2-0 we could put him in. "But he's an exciting player with real talent and I'd expect him to feature between now and the end of the season." http://www.sundaymail.co.uk/sport-news/sco...78057-21032139/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 5 nil up at half time to Inverness would have been the time to give him a good run. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdzKyle 7,895 Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 Maybe if we played him, we would be 2-0 up more often?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swagger 8,119 Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 Very good - dismiss an exciting young talent and stick with the tried and trusted fucking Adam - fantastic !!!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 What a fucking ridiculous thing to say. How can you say "He's the most natural for the position" and then say "We can't play him there because we need to win". Can anyone see how fucking stupid that sounds? It's the mentality that will hand Celtic 4IAR. Our management team come out with some amateur stuff at times, amateur! This sort of statement confirms everything I need to know about us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,009 Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 we've 2-0 up a few times this season and still not played him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boab 73 Posted January 11, 2009 Author Share Posted January 11, 2009 Well I'm glad SAF doesn't have the same view of Possebon or Barca with Messi...The best but too much 'pressure'... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
outlaw69uk 123 Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 Some good paraphrasing here! If you combin this, with the other stories from him today, it does seem that mcCoists opinions on the team, and who should be playing, are far removed from the ones Smith is putting out. He seems to think we should be playing the players, that we on here want to see Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zulu 981 Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 Ally you should just stick to telling jokes and leave the footballing comments to someone who has got a clue. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 Ally you should just stick to telling jokes and leave the footballing comments to someone who has got a clue. It 'almost' sounds like Ally HAS a clue though. He's saying that Aaron is the best player for our problem position, but isn't getting a game because of his age. And the point in signing him was.................? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KERRZO 5 Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 He pretty much contradicts himself there!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
outlaw69uk 123 Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 Ally you should just stick to telling jokes and leave the footballing comments to someone who has got a clue. It 'almost' sounds like Ally HAS a clue though. He's saying that Aaron is the best player for our problem position, but isn't getting a game because of his age. And the point in signing him was.................? It does, I think he could be no bad as the boss. I really do. I suppose he has to be a bit careful about what he says while Smith is still manager though? um? Coisty picked out guys like Aaron and Edu, and, is biding his time till smith leaves, then, he can play them, and we will have a lovely attacking team! (fingers crossed) I really hope he gets the cups again this season, just to see the team he picks to be honest. If he does, and, plays the likes of Edu, Aaron, Fleck, and, we do well, do you think that will change peoples opinion of him as next manager? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRICKY1872 118 Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 "As for Aaron, we've tried a few players on the left but he's probably the most natural for that position. "I can understand people saying 'Give him a go'. But we don't want to throw Aaron in at the moment when points are so vital - it would be unfair on him. "If we were winning the championship or leading games 2-0 we could put him in. "But he's an exciting player with real talent and I'd expect him to feature between now and the end of the season." http://www.sundaymail.co.uk/sport-news/sco...78057-21032139/ We have surely got to be the worst team on the planet for refusing to take a chance on youth. I could see the point if he was up against some stiff opposition for the position and had to bide his time but we have absolutely fuck all that is any better than him there at the moment. For Christ's sake give him his chance. Same goes for John Fleck. Is he going to go the high road a couple of seasons down the road like so many other good prospects to come through our doors? He's ready now. :unionflag: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 I hope Aaron moves on. I don't want Rangers saddled with the blame of ruining one of the best young prospects in European football. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 is Ally picking the Scottish cup team again this season, Tuesdays team selection may be interesting if he does.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
davie1689 1 Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 What a fucking ridiculous thing to say. How can you say "He's the most natural for the position" and then say "We can't play him there because we need to win". Can anyone see how fucking stupid that sounds? It's the mentality that will hand Celtic 4IAR. Our management team come out with some amateur stuff at times, amateur! This sort of statement confirms everything I need to know about us. that was what i was thinking m8 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 Since I always attempt to put both sides of the argument across, you could look at the St Johnstone team's absolutely brutal treatment of Burke and Naismith last year (totally unpunished because it was against the Gers) and say that the management team have a point with Aaron not playing just yet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
outlaw69uk 123 Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 Since I always attempt to put both sides of the argument across, you could look at the St Johnstone team's absolutely brutal treatment of Burke and Naismith last year (totally unpunished because it was against the Gers) and say that the management team have a point with Aaron not playing just yet. True, the downside to that is, they might pick LM to brutalise them I actually forgot about that game, well, I forgot about the Burke issues, I do remember Naismith tho, and, the guy should have walked Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
demise 3,517 Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 I thought Walter Smith is the only idiot in Rangers... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 I thought Walter Smith is the only idiot in Rangers... It's certainly easy to identify them amongst our fans........ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 But you'd rather try players out of position, rush players back and continue with Charlie Adam - yes, well done McCoist. If the title goes to the wire, there is no chance the management will 'give him a go' Your just another yes man, McCoist. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 But you'd rather try players out of position, rush players back and continue with Charlie Adam - yes, well done McCoist. If the title goes to the wire, there is no chance the management will 'give him a go' Your just another yes man, McCoist. A yes man to who.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dezrfc1 26 Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 5 nil up at half time to Inverness would have been the time to give him a good run. he wasnt on the bench that day <_< Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 5 nil up at half time to Inverness would have been the time to give him a good run. he wasnt on the bench that day <_< We also brought on another of our younger players to give him a game...... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Briton 394 Posted January 11, 2009 Share Posted January 11, 2009 How much of a risk would it be any way? It's not as if anyone else has done the business out on the left. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts