Jump to content

The press and this brilliant defending by Davis


GOAT

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 minute ago, Rfc52 said:

Anycunt showed him.the actual footage?

Yup. He's not posted about it since though. Yet anyway.

However, by the time he had a screenshot of the Defoe offside, he would have had a screenshot of the off the line effort.

Either way, it doesn't matter but the narrative as always is interesting!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Every taig, sheepshagger and hater will see with their own eyes that the ball didnt fully cross the line.

All this pish and lies from the fenian media  will show is their increasing desparation to attack and shackle us.

Their failed attacks are just all too transparent now and nobody gives a fuck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, GOAT said:

Every article online by the tarrier press is going with this goal line clearance claiming st Johnstone were robbed of a goal, even saying TV pictures showed it was clearly over the line, despite the fact TV pictures showed the complete opposite.   Also these articles don’t mention our stonewall penalty.  Our club really should be taking these cunts to task. 

We won. You're not meant to question these things.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Blumhoilann said:

No probs wi goal line tech,that would have cut the legs off the mhedia but f**k VAR,they're still getting it wrong wi that.

It's been horrible down south VAR.

Two games this weekend Leicester vs Spurs and  Chelsea vs Liverpool were it changed the game with thin margin offside calls.  

I can only imagine the shit storm it would cause up here if the SFA could actually afford it. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BlueKnight87 said:

It's been horrible down south VAR.

Two games this weekend Leicester vs Spurs and  Chelsea vs Liverpool were it changed the game with thin margin offside calls.  

I can only imagine the shit storm it would cause up here if the SFA could actually afford it. 

 

Too many still looking at decisions and var emotionally, without understanding when it can be applied and how. Its NOT designed to produce the correct outcome, which imo it should if we're going to bother halting games for it.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keevins was fucking spewing on the phone-in about the goal that 100% wasn’t a goal despite seeing the angle which shows it wasn’t over the line. Mega dafty Gordon Dalziel the bitter ex Ger agreeing with Keevins because he likes to play the Tarrier card. Switched it off rather sharply but it was wonderful to hear these fannies hurting so much. 😆

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TartanTeddy said:

Sportscene went with an image that clearly proved the whole ball didn't cross the line - even Michael Stewart didn't argue the fact. 

Non story

Chris Sutton couldn’t believe we weren’t awarded a penalty today.  That tells a story in and of itself.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

Sutton speaking sense yet theres bears not even bothered by the refs decision.

I don’t think a fuss has been kicked up because the penalty wouldn’t have changed the outcome of the game.  Rangers won comfortably in the end.  celtic are kicking up a fuss about the disallowed goal (that never crossed the line) because it feeds in to this conspiracy theory narrative they’ve bought in to.  They’ll talk about St.Johnstone being denied a goal as evidence of bias but won’t comment on the Rangers penalty claim.  Mentalists. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ref has got to have seen the hand ball, decided not to give it.

Rather than refereeing the game by the rules they are analysing the consequences of making the correct decision according to the rulebook.  It's been happening for a good few years.  We've seen it previously with unbelievable challenges in the first 10 minutes of a game - too early for a red.

The SFA just seem to stand by and watch it happen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, TMB said:

I don’t think a fuss has been kicked up because the penalty wouldn’t have changed the outcome of the game.  Rangers won comfortably in the end.  celtic are kicking up a fuss about the disallowed goal (that never crossed the line) because it feeds in to this conspiracy theory narrative they’ve bought in to.  They’ll talk about St.Johnstone being denied a goal as evidence of bias but won’t comment on the Rangers penalty claim.  Mentalists. 

The scum know that if they tell a lie often enough it'll be taken as truth. It's all about the narrative and agenda.

Whilst weve got folk playing down penalty decisions, not interested as we won, the scum challenge everything regardless.  

And we wonder why we continue to get shafted...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...