Jump to content

Jamie O'Hara says Bournemouth is a bigger job than Rangers


CR3

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply
5 minutes ago, British_Empire said:

and then ignore the rest of the post.

Good work, numpty.

No, I read it and it kinda redeemed itself. Hence why I said 'start of the post' 

 

numpty:matron:

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Essandoh said:

Of all the clubs to question him on she pipes up at Newcastle :lol: 

thought Newcastle were bigger than Everton tbh (but I'm limited going that far back in history) with my age.

Maybe generous saying we're bigger than Arsenal/Chelsea imho due to their commercial/global pull and general premier league exposure across the world but I respect it. @ForeverAndEver

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CR3 said:

thought Newcastle were bigger than Everton tbh (but I don't go that far back in history) with my age and he's saying you're getting closer.

Maybe generous saying we're bigger than Arsenal/Chelsea imho due to their commercial/global pull and general premier league exposure across the world but I respect it. @ForeverAndEver

Arsenal are the closest, Chelsea aren’t even close.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForeverAndEver said:

Arsenal are the closest, Chelsea aren’t even close.

without much thought I'd have said this year's top 4 and Arsenal would have been bigger due to fanbase and because the premier league is shown everywhere added to the amount of cash thrown at global commercialisation £££ but if anyones arguing us being bigger I obviously respect it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bit off topic but who the fuck is Mads Junker on sky sports talking  about danish football and fc Copenhagen then just randomly blurts out “a bit like celtic you just can’t beat them” 🤮
 

absolute cunt off a man 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ForeverAndEver said:

Arsenal are the closest, Chelsea aren’t even close.

Historically yes but when people are talking about big clubs they are meaning here and now. 

The top 4 in England are in a different stratosphere to us or them these days. 

City have won umpteen major trophies in the last decade and the likes of Chelsea have won the EPL titles and the CL too. 

Fan base and history aside those clubs in terms of curtent success, money and marketability leave us in the dust. While United and Liverpool are historically the biggest in Britain 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only an English man would think that, shows you how clueless they are.

Most think because they play in a cash rich footballing country that means there teams are bigger than Porto, Ajax, Rangers, Galatasaray and a whole host of others in Europe.....they are complete balloons.

I've been going on holiday all over the world for well over 20 years and in that time Rangers tops are always the most prominent that I see......i  have never seen a Bournemouth top, ever. That says it all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Man United and Liverpool are the only two that are bigger.

There isn't even another one you could argue was close to being as big never mind bigger.

Arsenal? Big enough club but are cunts in the congo wearing their tops if there's no Sky Sports? Doubt it.

Rangers, them, Man United and Liverpool are proper big clubs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 11 May 2024 11:30 Until 13:30
      0  
      celtic v Rangers
      celtic Park
      Scottish Premiership
      Live on Sky Sports Football HD and Sky Sports Main Event

×
×
  • Create New...