HelloMoto 0 Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 Nevermind Thomson at centre back, what about Beasley in midfield?! That guy's career at us is deader than Tupac. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlasgowRangersChampions52 5 Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 he is one of our best tackler and he has pace. i would rather him than mcculloch and weir they are to slow. also beasley is rapid and performs in the champions league. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HelloMoto 0 Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 he is one of our best tackler and he has pace. i would rather him than mcculloch and weir they are to slow. also beasley is rapid and performs in the champions league. Alright Walter, ever thought of using Just For Men? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastEnclosureBear 2,926 Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 The team I think Walter will pick. :mcgregor: :whittaker::bougherra::weir::papac::davis::mendes::thomson::rothen: :miller: The team I'd like to see :mcgregor: :whittaker::bougherra::weir::papac: :davis::mendes::thomson: :lafferty::miller: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 will be Miller up front on his own and a drab, uninspried, turgid, lacklistre performance against a mediocre team Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu1993 101 Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 :mcgregor: :whittaker: :bougherra: :weir: :papac: :davis: :thomson: :mendes: :lafferty: :miller: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted October 17, 2009 Author Share Posted October 17, 2009 No Boyd or McCulloch please! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu1993 101 Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 No Boyd or McCulloch please! If anyone suggest either of they two i will be dissopointed, though im a fan of boyd this is not the time for him to be played, we realy need a win in this game if we want to progress. Wouldnt mind him comming on later, but i think we need the energy and pace in the team for this one, excluding mr Weir and this is also my 1000th post Aha long time comming Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
H72 265 Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 :papac: :papac::papac::papac::papac: :papac::papac::papac::papac: :papac::papac: Awww made my night. Legend Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 No Boyd or McCulloch please! If anyone suggest either of they two i will be dissopointed, though im a fan of boyd this is not the time for him to be played, we realy need a win in this game if we want to progress. Wouldnt mind him comming on later, but i think we need the energy and pace in the team for this one, excluding mr Weir and this is also my 1000th post Aha long time comming You would think Boyd would learn to work on his game after watching pretty much all of our European ties since he joined from the bench and this is my 500th post only took me 2 years Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 The number of people starting Lafferty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlippinEck 3,708 Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 :mcgregor: :whittaker: :bougherra: :weir: :papac: :thomson: :davis: :mendes: :rothen: :miller:---------------------- :novo: :mendes: :davis: :miller: Or that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu1993 101 Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 The number of people starting Lafferty. i only started him cause i thought rothen wasnt to good today. Wouldnt like to see that form in a champions league game, or laffertys form but i think he has the pace to give there defence problems Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NOLUWDC 1 Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 :papac: :papac::papac::papac::papac: :papac::papac::papac::papac: :papac::papac: 4-4-2.....? :mellow: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pedro 32 Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 My god, why are people wanting to see Wylde, Beasley and McCulloch play in such an important game? :mcgregor: :whittaker: :bougherra: :weir: :papac: :mendes: :novo: :davis: :boyd: :miller: Now that Boyd has got a goal his confidence will be quite high I reckon, and with the likes of Miller, Novo, Davis and Naismith providing good feeds for Boyd I am confident he will get a goal or maybe an assist at best Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duncan 23 Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 :mcgregor: :whittaker: :bougherra: :weir: :papac: :thomson: :davis: :mendes: :mcculloch: :miller: or:mcgregor: :whittaker: :bougherra: :weir: :papac: :davis: :mendes: :thomson: :novo: :miller: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fonics7 1 Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 don't really have anything in midfield to worry about. similar to our awful midfield yesterday Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pedro 32 Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 McCulloch at an attacking left mid role? No chance Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu1993 101 Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 McCulloch at an attacking left mid role? No chance agree on that one buddy, no thanks to see that on the night please Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pedro 32 Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 If we were winning by a goal around maybe the 60 min+ mark I would play this from my team, :mcgregor: :whittaker: :bougherra: :weir: :papac: :novo: :mendes: :davis: :miller: :boyd: Just to make sure we can keep possesion, no long balls, and when on the attack make sure Miller and Novo go up and support Naismith and Boyd and push Davis up the midfield and keep Mendes back to cover in midfield. And if Boyd is playing bad at that time, swap him with Naismith and bring Fleck on for the AM role. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu1993 101 Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 If we were winning by a goal around maybe the 60 min+ mark I would play this from my team, :mcgregor: :whittaker: :bougherra: :weir: :papac: :novo: :mendes: :davis: :miller: :boyd: Just to make sure we can keep possesion, no long balls, and when on the attack make sure Miller and Novo go up and support Naismith and Boyd and push Davis up the midfield and keep Mendes back to cover in midfield. And if Boyd is playing bad at that time, swap him with Naismith and bring Fleck on for the AM role. If were winning and want to keep possesion i think it would have to be lafferty or miller up top, lafferty is alot better at holding the ball up than boyd i would say. and he can also run it defenders if hes not got alot of support, same with miller Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSuedeSambas 53,946 Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 :mcgregor: :whittaker::bougherra::weir::papac: :davis::mendes::thomson: :novo::miller: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 :mcgregor: :whittaker::bougherra::weir::papac: :davis::mendes::thomson: :novo::miller: I wish. Exactly the team I'd go for, but Davie Weir would need a good ticking off pre-match in terms of lugging the ball up the park to no-one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StuartM6 279 Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 :alexander: :whittaker: :bougherra: :weir: :papac: :rothen: :mendes: :thomson: :davis: :beasley: :beasley: :mcgregor: :whittaker: :bougherra: :weir: :papac: :davis: :thomson: :mendes: :miller: :boyd: lets go for it! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pedro 32 Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 If we were winning by a goal around maybe the 60 min+ mark I would play this from my team, :mcgregor: :whittaker: :bougherra: :weir: :papac: :novo: :mendes: :davis: :miller: :boyd: Just to make sure we can keep possesion, no long balls, and when on the attack make sure Miller and Novo go up and support Naismith and Boyd and push Davis up the midfield and keep Mendes back to cover in midfield. And if Boyd is playing bad at that time, swap him with Naismith and bring Fleck on for the AM role. If were winning and want to keep possesion i think it would have to be lafferty or miller up top, lafferty is alot better at holding the ball up than boyd i would say. and he can also run it defenders if hes not got alot of support, same with miller They are quite similar but I wouldn't play Lafferty as he will lose the ball more than Boyd and give away more free-kicks because he strays offside to much, Boyd on the other hand is better at staying onside. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts