rangers_1993 68 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 I wandered this too, I would much prefer Beattie to be honestAgreed if Kyle hasn't played in over a year its a bit of a risk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alukotheblackmessi 22 Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 does anyone know the latest with Kyle, is he still training with us? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marky. 6,927 Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 Too ugly to wear a Rangers shirt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeirFleckNRothen 1,789 Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 If we bring in Beattie, then we absolutely don't need Kevin Kyle.He's too much of a risk, anyway. He's at the wrong end of his career and is coming off a horrible, horrible injury. No thanks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mick1271 521 Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 A guy I play poker with plays in the same darts league as Kyle (he plays for the local tim pub in kirkintilloch).he says he was talking to him earlier in the week and Kyle says he has been offered a deal with us and is going to accept it. Cant see any reason to disbelieve him as he is a bear and not the type of guy to make things up . ps ... i dont want him and i dont think we need him either. would much rather have Beattie than Kyle. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamFyfe 1,438 Posted August 2, 2012 Share Posted August 2, 2012 Hope we sign Kyle, need some more striker options Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeeWallaceRFC 3,920 Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 Scott Burns said on Twitter, that he reckons we will offer him a deal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangersMedia 35,961 Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 Scott Burns said on Twitter, that he reckons we will offer him a deal.Need to start following this guy, seems to be spot on with quite a few of his predictions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz52 11,837 Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 Can't see why people are complaining, he's coming to Rangers where he'll find his fitness and start scoring goals for fun.Never a bad thing to have options Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
markrfc1 1 Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 Not a fan but we need players and think he could do a job in division 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Carpintero 546 Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 Can't see why people are complaining, he's coming to Rangers where he'll find his fitness and start scoring goals for fun.Never a bad thing to have optionsCorrect. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agentorange 17 Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 As title. Suppose 1 year deal is ok. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdocherty72 215 Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 Would Rather Beattie tbh.Source? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Escobar 13,676 Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 SOurce? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunny_01 2,007 Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 doesnt make sense as i dont think he can re register in the transfer embargo??? could be completely wrong their though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottyc06 6,915 Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 doesnt make sense as i dont think he can re register in the transfer embargo??? could be completely wrong their thoughWouldn't apply to players already at the club! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Carpintero 546 Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 Pretty pointless is he can't re-sign for a second year when the embargo is still in place. Maybe he can. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gazza27 15,283 Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 source Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz92 966 Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 doesnt make sense as i dont think he can re register in the transfer embargo??? could be completely wrong their thoughTransfer embargo doesn't start until the 1st of September?Edit: realise what you're saying now. Players already at the club can still sign new deals during an embargo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamFyfe 1,438 Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 Bit of a shit deal tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right_To_Censor 1,951 Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 Wouldn't apply to players already at the club!oh i got you now, my bad Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWTC 2,247 Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 doesnt make sense as i dont think he can re register in the transfer embargo??? could be completely wrong their thoughWe're allowed to offe contracts to current players i think mate.Source for this thread BTW Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLE SUPER WILBERT 2,475 Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 what club?Dumbarton Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agentorange 17 Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 Journo mate. Has been right with everything else. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottyc06 6,915 Posted August 5, 2012 Share Posted August 5, 2012 A one year deal would be the best thing to have for him, considering how injury prone he can be! Wouldn't want to have on the books for three years and for him to be injured for most of it, give him a year, if it's going well extend it! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts